scholarly journals Food Addiction in a Spanish Sample of Eating Disorders: DSM-5 Diagnostic Subtype Differentiation and Validation Data

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 389-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roser Granero ◽  
Ines Hilker ◽  
Zaida Agüera ◽  
Susana Jiménez-Murcia ◽  
Sarah Sauchelli ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. e192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Aurélio C. Rosa ◽  
Julie Collombat ◽  
Cecile M. Denis ◽  
Jean-Marc Alexandre ◽  
F. Serre ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Isaksson ◽  
Ata Ghaderi ◽  
Martina Wolf-Arehult ◽  
Mia Ramklint

Abstract Background Personality has been suggested to be an important factor in understanding onset, maintenance, and recovery from eating disorders (ED). The objective of the current study was to evaluate personality style in different ED diagnostic groups as classified in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth edition (DSM-5). Methods The overcontrolled, undercontrolled, and resilient personality styles were compared in four groups of patients with EDs: anorexia nervosa restricting (ANr) (n = 34), anorexia nervosa binge eating/purging (ANbp) (n = 31), atypical anorexia nervosa (AAN) (n = 29), and bulimia nervosa (BN) (n = 76). These groups were compared with a group of patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) (n = 108), and a non-clinical group (NC) (n = 444). Patient data were collected at two outpatient clinics in Uppsala, Sweden. NC control data were collected through convenience sampling. Participants filled out questionnaires assessing personality style. Results The main findings were more pronounced overcontrol reported by the ANr and AAN groups compared with the BN, BPD, and NC groups, and no significant difference in resilience between the ED and the NC groups. Considerable variability of over- and undercontrol was also found within each group. Conclusions The results replicate previous findings when EDs are classified according to current diagnostic criteria (DSM-5). Taking personality styles into account may improve our understanding of certain characteristics in EDs, such as social deficits and rigidity that are attributed to poor treatment outcome.


2017 ◽  
Vol 171 ◽  
pp. e52
Author(s):  
Cecile Marianne Denis ◽  
Marco Aurélio Camargo da Rosa ◽  
Fuschia Serre ◽  
C. Kervran ◽  
Maud Henry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Zaida Agüera ◽  
Nadine Riesco ◽  
Eduardo Valenciano-Mendoza ◽  
Roser Granero ◽  
Isabel Sánchez ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S81-S81
Author(s):  
V. Deiana ◽  
E. Diana ◽  
F. Pinna ◽  
M.G. Atzeni ◽  
F. Medda ◽  
...  

Adherence to self-management and medication regimens is required to achieve blood glucose control in diabetic patients. Therefore, diabulimia, the deliberate insulin restriction/omission to lose weight, and other disordered eating behaviors (DEBs) or eating disorders (EDs), place these patients at risk of complications.We aimed to establish the frequency of diabulimia, DEBs and EDs among patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes (T1DM and T2DM) and their association with other clinical features.A total of 211 insulin-treated diabetic patients (13–55 years old) answered the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised (DEPS-R), a diabetes-specific screening tool for DEBs, and the Eating Disorders Inventory-3 (EDI-3). SCID-I modified according to DSM-5 criteria was used to diagnose EDs.At the DEPS-R, 20.8% of the sample scored above the cutoff, more frequently females (P = 0.005), patients with T1DM (P = 0.045), with a diagnosis of ED (P < 0.001), positive to the EDI-3 (P ≤ 0.001), with physical comorbidities (P = 0.003), with HbA1c > 7% (P = 0.020). Combining data from the interview with the results at the DEPS-R, 60.2% of the sample presented diabulimia. Dividing the sample by gender, we found that diabulimic females more frequently used diet pills (P = 0.006), had significantly higher HbA1c (P = 0.019) and STAI-Y1 scores (P = 0.004). Other DEBs comprised dietary restraint (51.8% of the sample), binge eating (42.2%), vomiting (6.2%), diet pills (7.1%) or laxatives (1.9%) or diuretics use (4.3%). Overall, 21.8% of the sample, mostly females (P < 0.001) met criteria for at least one DSM-5 diagnosis of ED.Diabetic patients, especially women, should be carefully monitored for the presence of diabulimia, BEDs and EDs.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Octavian Vasiliu

Food addiction is considered an important link for a better understanding of psychiatric and medical problems triggered by dysfunctions of eating behaviors, e. g., obesity, metabolic syndrome, binge eating disorder, or bulimia nervosa. At behavioral level, food addiction has high degrees of similarity with other eating disorders, a phenomenon that creates difficulties in finding specific diagnostic criteria. Food addiction has been also described as “eating addiction” or “eating dependence” by several researchers, who placed the emphasis on the behavior and not on the food itself. High-sodium foods, artificially flavored-foods, rich carbohydrate- and saturated fats-containing foods are triggers for the activation of the same neural pathways, therefore they act similarly to any drug of abuse. Food addiction is considered a disorder based on functional negative consequences, associated distress and potential risks to both psychological well-being and physical health. A clinical scale was validated for the quantification of the eating addiction severity, namely the Yale Food Addiction Severity Scale (YFAS), constructed to match DSM IV criteria for substance dependence. Using this instrument, a high prevalence of food addiction was found in the general population, up to 20% according to a meta-analytic research. The pathogenesis of this entity is still uncertain, but reward dysfunction, impulsivity and emotion dysregulation have been considered basic mechanisms that trigger both eating dysfunctions and addictive behaviors. Genetic factors may be involved in this dependence, as modulators of higher carbohydrate and saturate fat craving. Regarding the existence of potential therapeutic solutions, lorcaserin, antiepileptic drugs, opioid antagonists, antiaddictive agents are recommended for obesity and eating disorders, and they may be intuitively used in food addiction, but clinical trials are necessary to confirm their efficacy. In conclusion, a better understanding of food addiction's clinical profile and pathogenesis may help clinicians in finding prevention- and therapeutic-focused interventions in the near future.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Caudle ◽  
Christine Pang ◽  
Sam Mancuso ◽  
David Castle ◽  
Richard Newton

Author(s):  
David Watson ◽  
Michael W. O’Hara

This chapter reviews major findings reported in earlier chapters. First, previous findings confirm the existence of specific symptom dimensions that are highly robust and that show strong convergent and discriminant validity. Second, they establish the existence of multiple symptom dimensions within several disorders. Third, they demonstrate that these specific symptom dimensions have differential criterion validity, differential diagnostic specificity, and differential incremental validity. These symptom data can be used to improve various DSM diagnoses, such as major depression and posttraumatic stress disorder. More fundamentally, they provide the basis for a comprehensive symptom-based model of psychopathology. In addition to the IDAS-II, other instruments assess dimensions underlying sleep disorders, eating disorders, schizotypy, personality disorder, and hypochondriasis. These instruments jointly provide broad coverage of the 19 diagnostic classes contained in DSM-5. These measures support movement away from disorder-based models of psychopathology to ones focused on homogeneous symptom dimensions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document