scholarly journals Performance evaluation and influential factor analysis for stacking-based seismic location

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Li ◽  
František Staněk ◽  
Tingting Zhan
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Influential Factor ◽  
Seismic Location

scholarly journals Intention to use m-banking application: an empirical study in Ho Chi Minh City

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 637-653
Author(s):  
Phuong Viet Le-Hoang
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Multiple Regression Model ◽  
Perceived Usefulness ◽  
Influential Factor ◽  
Ho Chi Minh City ◽  
Intention To Use ◽  
Mobile Banking ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Expected Performance ◽  
Insight Into

The research aims to explore, measure, and analyze factors affecting the intention to use Mobile Banking (M-Banking) of customers in Ho Chi Minh City. The author conducts a convenient sampling, including 600 participants. The method of the research is the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and a multiple regression model. The results show that there are six factors such as perceived ease to use (EU), perceived usefulness (PU), trust (TR), expected performance (PE), social influence (SI), Facilitating condition (FC) affect the adoption of M-Banking. In which, Facilitating condition is the most influential factor, and expected performance is the least influential factor. Also, this study proposes some recommendations to develop an M-Banking application to help customers gain more insight into the bank as well as actively select the M-Banking application as a reliable transaction method.

A validation of the performance management scale

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 1253-1267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khahan Na-nan ◽  
Kanokporn Chaiprasit ◽  
Peerapong Pukkeeree
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Performance Management ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
Evaluation Performance ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Performance Review ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Fit Index

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop a performance management (PM) scale questionnaire that encompasses the pre-requisite, performance planning, performance evaluation, performance review, and performance application dimensions of PM. Design/methodology/approach In the study, the 33 questionnaire questions were first validated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and then by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) along the three performance dimensions. The research sample consists of 330 entrepreneurs. The factor analysis results confirm the validity of the questionnaire as a reliable entrepreneur PM evaluation tool, as evidenced by the composite reliability of 0.845 and the average variance extracted of 0.532. Findings All constructs revealed the acceptable internal consistency reliability. A good model fit was found for the measurement model using several fit index like χ2=449.983, degree of freedom=415, p-value (p)=0.114, goodness of fit index=0.927, adjusted goodness of fit index=0.901, root mean square error of approximation=0.016, and root of mean square residuals=0.032. Research limitations/implications The PM model was examined using EFA and CFA only. A sample with only SMEs entrepreneurs and large sample size and sample area can be used in future research. Practical implications This research paper is an endeavor to explore only the reliability and validity of the PM model. Thus all the five dimension, namely “pre-requisite” “performance planning,” “performance evaluation,” “performance review,” and “performance application” proved out of be reliable and validated when it will be tested in case of SMEs’ high-growth sectors and high-impact sectors. Originality/value The main contribution of this research is that all factors have a good fit and acceptable reliability value; each factor can be measured individually depending on the nature of the research.

scholarly journals Productivity evaluation and influential factor analysis for Sarvak reservoir in South Azadegan oil field, Iran

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 627-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui LIU ◽  
Rui GUO ◽  
Junchang DONG ◽  
Li LIU ◽  
Yang LIU ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Influential Factor

scholarly journals Development, implementation and reliability assessment of an emergency physician performance evaluation tool

CJEM ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 2 (04) ◽  
pp. 237-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy Etherington ◽  
Grant Innes ◽  
James Christenson ◽  
Jonathan Berkowitz ◽  
Robert Chamberlain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Emergency Physician ◽  
Physician Satisfaction ◽  
Single Individual ◽  
Evaluation Tool ◽  
Emergency Nurses ◽  
Intra Class Correlation ◽  
Intra Class Correlation Coefficient

ABSTRACT Evaluation of physician practice is necessary, both to provide feedback for self-improvement and to guide department heads during yearly evaluations. Objective: To develop and implement a peer-based performance evaluation tool and to measure reliability and physician satisfaction. Methods: Each emergency physician in an urban emergency department evaluated their peers by completing a survey consisting of 21 questions on effectiveness in 4 categories: clinical practice, interaction with coworkers and the public, nonclinical departmental responsibilities, and academic activities. A sample of emergency nurses evaluated each emergency physician on a subset of 5 of the questions. Factor analysis was used to assess the reliability of the questions and categories. Intra-class correlation coefficients were calculated to determine inter-rater reliability. After receiving their peer evaluations, each physician rated the process’s usefulness to the individual and the department. Results: 225 surveys were completed on 16 physicians. Factor analysis did not distinguish the nonclinical and academic categories as distinct; therefore, the survey questions fell into 3 domains, rather than the 4 hypothesized. The overall intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.43 for emergency physicians, indicating moderate, but far from perfect, agreement. This suggests that variability exists between physician evaluators, and that multiple reviewers are probably required to provide a balanced physician evaluation. The intra-class correlation coefficient for emergency nurses was 0.11, suggesting poor reliability. Overall, 11 of 15 physicians reported the process valuable or mostly valuable, 3 of 15 were unsure and 1 of 15 reported that the process was definitely not valuable. Conclusion: Physician evaluation by a single individual is probably unreliable. A useful physician peer evaluation tool can be developed. Most physicians view a personalized, broad-based, confidential peer review as valuable.

Research on the Operating Performance Evaluation of Listed Companies Supplying Water and Gas Based on Factor Analysis

2011 ◽  
Vol 467-469 ◽  
pp. 543-548
Author(s):  
Jun Fei Chen ◽  
Xiao Lan Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation Model ◽  
Operating Performance ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Development Potential ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Performance Evaluation Model

The operating performance of listed companies is the comprehensive response on their quality of assets, operating state, development potential and so on. In this paper, evaluating indexes system which was used to evaluate the operating performance was provided combining with the feature of supplying water and gas listed companies in China. The performance evaluation model based on the factor analysis is established. As a case, the performance of 18 listed companies supplying water and gas in China is selected and evaluated. The case shows that the model is effective and can provide a basis for decision-making for enterprises improving management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document