Retrospective memory integration accompanies reconfiguration of neural cell assemblies

Hippocampus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ye Wang ◽  
Yaling Deng ◽  
Lihong Cao ◽  
Jiahong Zhang ◽  
Lei Yang
Author(s):  
Petra Jahn ◽  
Johannes Engelkamp

There is ample evidence that memory for action phrases such as “open the bottle” is better in subject-performed tasks (SPTs), i.e., if the participants perform the actions, than in verbal tasks (VTs), if they only read the phrases or listen to them. It is less clear whether also the sole intention to perform the actions later, i.e., a prospective memory task (PT), improves memory compared with VTs. Inconsistent findings have been reported for within-subjects and between-subjects designs. The present study attempts to clarify the situation. In three experiments, better recall for SPTs than for PTs and for PTs than for VTs were observed if mixed lists were used. If pure lists were used, there was a PT effect but no SPT over PT advantage. The findings were discussed from the perspective of item-specific and relational information.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie Cuttler ◽  
Christopher P. Connolly ◽  
Emily M. LaFrance ◽  
Tanner M. Lowry

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrike Zetsche ◽  
Thomas Ehring ◽  
Anke Ehlers
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kah-Hui Wong ◽  
Sabaratnam Vikineswary ◽  
Noorlidah Abdullah ◽  
Murali Naidu ◽  
Roger Keynes

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Huijser ◽  
Niels Anne Taatgen ◽  
Marieke K. van Vugt

Preparing for the future during ongoing activities is an essential skill. Yet, it is currently unclear to what extent we can prepare for the future in parallel with another task. In two experiments, we investigated how characteristics of a present task influenced whether and when participants prepared for the future, as well as its usefulness. We focused on the influence of concurrent working memory load, assuming that working memory would interfere most strongly with preparation. In both experiments, participants performed a novel sequential dual-task paradigm, in which they could voluntary prepare for a second task while performing a first task. We identified task preparation by means of eye tracking, through detecting when participants switched their gaze from the first to the second task. The results showed that participants prepared productively, as evidenced by faster RTs on the second task, with only a small cost to the present task. The probability of preparation and its productiveness decreased with general increases in present task difficulty. In contrast to our prediction, we found some but no consistent support for influence of concurrent working memory load on preparation. Only for concurrent high working memory load (i.e., two items in memory), we observed strong interference with preparation. We conclude that preparation is affected by present task difficulty, potentially due to decreased opportunities for preparation and changes in multitasking strategy. Furthermore, the interference from holding two items may reflect that concurrent preparation is compromised when working memory integration is required by both processes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document