scholarly journals Breast cancer-specific survival by clinical subtype after 7 years follow-up of young and elderly women in a nationwide cohort

2018 ◽  
Vol 144 (6) ◽  
pp. 1251-1261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna L.V. Johansson ◽  
Cassia B. Trewin ◽  
Kirsti Vik Hjerkind ◽  
Merete Ellingjord-Dale ◽  
Tom Børge Johannesen ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 612-612
Author(s):  
B. M. Syed ◽  
S. J. Johnston ◽  
D. W. M. Wong ◽  
D. A. L. Morgan ◽  
I. O. Ellis ◽  
...  

612 Background: A recent Cochrane review of seven randomised trials involving 1,446 elderly women (unselected for oestrogen receptor (ER) status) has shown no significant difference in overall survival between surgery (with or without adjuvant tamoxifen) and primary endocrine therapy using tamoxifen. We now report results of a large series from a single centre with a dedicated elderly breast cancer service, with long term follow-up. Methods: During a period of > 20 years, 1,031 elderly (> 70 years) women with ER positive (H-score >50) early operable primary breast cancer received either surgery (with or without adjuvant endocrine therapy) (N = 436) or primary endocrine therapy (N = 595) (>80% using tamoxifen) as initial treatment, with complete follow-up information till deaths. The initial treatment was decided based on fitness for surgery and patient choice. Analysis was carried out on breast cancer specific survival and degree of ER positivity. Results: After a median follow up of 49 months (range 0 - 261 months), patients between 70 - 80 years, treated by surgery, had better 5-year breast cancer specific survival compared to their counterparts treated by primary endocrine therapy (95% versus 85%; p < 0.001). For patients > 80 years, there was however no statistical difference between the two groups (90% versus 90%; p = 0.813). The median survival has not reached yet in all groups. Patients in the latter group (> 80 years) were found to have a higher chance of having strongly ER positive tumours (57% versus 50% in patients between 70 - 80 years with H-score >200; p- < 0.02). Conclusions: In a selected group of elderly women (> 80 years) who tend to have strongly ER positive tumours, surgery and primary endocrine therapy did not appear to produce any difference in breast cancer specific survival. This subject is currently being investigated in a national randomised trial in the UK. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (19) ◽  
pp. 2382-2387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin S. Hughes ◽  
Lauren A. Schnaper ◽  
Jennifer R. Bellon ◽  
Constance T. Cirrincione ◽  
Donald A. Berry ◽  
...  

Purpose To determine whether there is a benefit to adjuvant radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery and tamoxifen in women age ≥ 70 years with early-stage breast cancer. Patients and Methods Between July 1994 and February 1999, 636 women (age ≥ 70 years) who had clinical stage I (T1N0M0 according to TNM classification) estrogen receptor (ER) –positive breast carcinoma treated by lumpectomy were randomly assigned to receive tamoxifen plus radiation therapy (TamRT; 317 women) or tamoxifen alone (Tam; 319 women). Primary end points were time to local or regional recurrence, frequency of mastectomy, breast cancer–specific survival, time to distant metastasis, and overall survival (OS). Results Median follow-up for treated patients is now 12.6 years. At 10 years, 98% of patients receiving TamRT (95% CI, 96% to 99%) compared with 90% of those receiving Tam (95% CI, 85% to 93%) were free from local and regional recurrences. There were no significant differences in time to mastectomy, time to distant metastasis, breast cancer–specific survival, or OS between the two groups. Ten-year OS was 67% (95% CI, 62% to 72%) and 66% (95% CI, 61% to 71%) in the TamRT and Tam groups, respectively. Conclusion With long-term follow-up, the previously observed small improvement in locoregional recurrence with the addition of radiation therapy remains. However, this does not translate into an advantage in OS, distant disease-free survival, or breast preservation. Depending on the value placed on local recurrence, Tam remains a reasonable option for women age ≥ 70 years with ER-positive early-stage breast cancer.


2010 ◽  
Vol 92 (7) ◽  
pp. 562-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siong-Seng Liau ◽  
Massimiliano Cariati ◽  
David Noble ◽  
Charles Wilson ◽  
Gordon C Wishart

INTRODUCTION The risk of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR) following breast conservation surgery (BCS) for invasive breast cancer (IBC) and radiotherapy is dependent on patient-, tumour- and treatment-related variables. In the Cambridge Breast Unit, breast conserving surgery has been performed with a target radial margin of 5 mm for IBC, in combination with 40-Gy hypofractionated (15 fractions) breast radiotherapy, since 1999. PATIENTS AND METHODS An audit was performed of cases treated between 1999 and 2004. A total of 563 patients underwent BCS for invasive breast cancer with 90.4% receiving radiotherapy (RT) and 60.4% of patients receiving boost RT (3 fractions of 3-Gy). RESULTS After a median follow-up of 58 months, five of the 563 (0.9%) patients developed IBTR. The 5-year actuarial IBTR rate was 1.1%. In terms of distant disease recurrence (DDR), 29 of the 563 (5.2%) had DDR during follow-up, giving a 5-year actuarial DDR rate of 5.4%. The 5-year breast cancer specific survival was 95%, with the poorer NPI groups having worse breast cancer specific survival (Log-rank, P < 0.0001). More importantly, patients with IBTR had a shorter breast cancer-specific survival than those who were IBTR-free (Log-rank, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Our treatment regimen, combining BCS with a 5-mm target margin and hypofractionated 40-Gy RT, results in an extremely low rate of IBTR, and compares favourably with the target IBTR rate of < 5% defined by the Association of Breast Surgeons (ABS) at BASO guidelines.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
R J Almeida ◽  
C T M Luizaga ◽  
J Eluf-Neto ◽  
E C Pessoa ◽  
A M M Chiarotti ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Breast cancer is a public health problem worldwide, being the most common malignant neoplasm in the female population. Objectives To estimate 5- and 10-year breast cancer-specific survival probabilities of patients included in the hospital-based cancer registry (HBCR) of the Fundação Oncocentro de São Paulo (FOSP, in Portuguese) and to assess the prognostic factors for this neoplasm. Methods Historical cohort study that included women with breast cancer included in HBCR-FOSP and diagnosed between 2002 and 2012. The event of interest was breast cancer-specific mortality. Living cases at the end of follow-up (December 31, 2017), loss to follow-up and death other than that due to breast cancer were considered censored on the date of the last contact or date of death. Descriptive analysis and survival analysis were performed using the Kaplan-Meyer method. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HR) and their 95%CI were estimated using Cox's proportional hazards model. The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University, Brazil. Results 53,146 cases of invasive breast cancer were registered at HBCR-FOSP between 2002-2012. The median age at diagnosis was 55.9 years. By the end of the follow-up, 20,683 patients died, and 71.4% were due to breast cancer. The 5- and 10-year breast cancer-specific survival for the entire cohort was 76.1% (95%CI 75.7-76.5%) and 64.8% (95% CI 64.2-65.3%), respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the factors associated with prognosis were age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis, educational level, clinical stage, and histological type. Conclusions These findings may contribute to the development of policies for the identification of breast tumors at earlier stages. Key messages Breast cancer is an important public health problem in Brazil and worldwide. The findings of this study may contribute to the development of public policies for the control of breast cancer in the state of São Paulo.


Pathology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. S70
Author(s):  
Liana Dedina ◽  
Jamie R. Kutasovic ◽  
Amy E. McCart Reed ◽  
Peter T. Simpson ◽  
Sunil R. Lakhani

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document