Varying reactions to feedback and their effects on observer accuracy and feedback omission

Author(s):  
Nicholas Matey ◽  
Andressa Sleiman ◽  
Jessica Nastasi ◽  
Erin Richard ◽  
Nicole Gravina

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Remus Ilies ◽  
Timothy A. Judge ◽  
David T. Wagner

This paper focuses on explaining how individuals set goals on multiple performance episodes, in the context of performance feedback comparing their performance on each episode with their respective goal. The proposed model was tested through a longitudinal study of 493 university students’ actual goals and performance on business school exams. Results of a structural equation model supported the proposed conceptual model in which self-efficacy and emotional reactions to feedback mediate the relationship between feedback and subsequent goals. In addition, as expected, participants’ standing on a dispositional measure of behavioral inhibition influenced the strength of their emotional reactions to negative feedback.





1995 ◽  
Vol 25 (15) ◽  
pp. 1360-1390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Waung ◽  
Maurya Macneil ◽  
Robert J. Vance


Author(s):  
Andrea Usai ◽  
Paolo Di Giamberardino

In this chapter, we describe a homography approach to vision based feedback for nonholonomic mobile robots control. Differently than other approaches based on homography or fundamental matrix, our method has been developed to be robust to reference features loss, during the robot movement. This allows us to implement an arbitrary control law without the need of a teach-by-showing stage. In the chapter, the use of a stereo camera system to improve the observer accuracy and to perform an auto-calibration of the stereo-head pose is investigated. Experimental results are provided to show the performances of the proposed system state estimation, using an eye-in-hand mobile robotic platform.



2009 ◽  
Vol 281 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Yoong ◽  
S. Karavolos ◽  
M. Damodaram ◽  
K. Madgwick ◽  
N. Milestone ◽  
...  


2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 29242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrina F. Hurley ◽  
Nick A. Giffin ◽  
Samuel A. Stewart ◽  
Graham B. Bullock


1985 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 899-906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Les M. Irwig ◽  
Hennie T. Groeneveld ◽  
Jan P.G. Pretorius ◽  
Eva Hnizdo
Keyword(s):  


1988 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 605-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Beth DeGregorio ◽  
Cynthia D. Fisher

Subordinate reactions to feedback given in four different ways were assessed. Method one was unilateral, top-down feedback. Method two was supervisoryfeedback with subordinate participation in the discussion. Methods three and four involved a self-appraisal instrument completed prior to a participative performance discussion. In method three, the self-appraisal was not explicitly discussed, whereas in methodfour it was the heart of the discussion. All participative methods tended to result in more positive subordinate perceptions than the unilateral method, but no one particular participative technique was consistently superior. The appraisal methods had no differential impact on post-feedback performance.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document