Associations Between Specific Mindfulness Practices and In‐Session Relational Factors

2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 372-383
Author(s):  
David A. Johnson ◽  
Adriana Walsh
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carissa J. Schmidt ◽  
Sarah A. Stoddard ◽  
Justin E. Heinze ◽  
Cleopatra H. Caldwell ◽  
Marc A. Zimmerman

Author(s):  
Xiaochuan Wang

Drawing on data from the National Latino and Asian American Study, this article examines the influence of family relational factors, independently and jointly with immigration generation status, on past-year mental health service utilization among Asian Americans ( N = 1,599). Findings revealed the important role of family relation in influencing the likelihood and type of Asian Americans’ mental health service use. Lower level of family cohesion and higher level of family conflict were associated with increased likelihood of service use. Results from multiple logistic regressions further indicated that generation status interacts with family relation in affecting service use. Specifically, effect of family cohesion on general health service use was modified by generation status among third- or later-generation Asian Americans. Practice implications and future research directions are discussed to better understand and address the mental health needs of this population.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 60-61
Author(s):  
Johan Suen

Abstract For holistic interventions and research on dementia, it is fundamental to understand care experiences from the perspectives of carers, care recipients, and care professionals. While research on care dyads and triads have highlighted the effects of communication and interactional aspects on care relationships, there is a lack of knowledge on how individual-contextual and relational factors shape the provision and receipt of care in terms of decision-making processes, resource allocation, and expectations of care outcomes. Thus, this paper sheds light on (i) how carers negotiate care provision with other important life domains such as employment, household/family roles and conflicts, as well as their own health problems, life goals, values, and aspirations for ageing; (ii) how older adults with dementia perceive support and those who provide it; (iii) the structural constraints faced by care professionals in delivering a team-based mode of dementia care; and, taken together, (iv) how community-based dementia care is impeded by barriers at the individual, relational, and institutional levels. Findings were derived from semi-structured interviews and observational data from fieldwork conducted with 20 persons with dementia (median age = 82), 20 of their carers (median age = 60), and 4 professional care providers. All respondents were clients and staff of a multidisciplinary and community-based dementia care system in Singapore. Our analysis indicates the impact of dementia care is strongly mediated by the interplay between institutional/familial contexts of care provision and the various ‘orientations’ to cognitive impairment and seeking support, which we characterised as ‘denial/acceptance’, ‘obligated’, ‘overprotective’, and ‘precariously vulnerable’.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 16-17
Author(s):  
Molly Perkins ◽  
Ann Vandenberg ◽  
Candace Kemp ◽  
Mary Ball ◽  
Joanna Jungerman ◽  
...  

Abstract Limited empirical evidence suggests that caregiver burden is greater for informal care partners (family and friends) in assisted living (AL) compared with other long-term care settings, particularly within context of end of life. Using qualitative data from a larger 5-year, 7-site study of end-of-life care in AL funded by the National Institute on Aging (R01AG047408), we investigate informal care partners’ involvement in end-of-life care and identify challenges related to informal caregiving that might contribute to care burden. Grounded theory analysis of ethnographic data and in-depth interviews (average interview length = 97 minutes) with 59 racially and ethnically diverse informal care partners (mean age = 60) shows that informal care partner involvement in end-of-life care varies across participants and over time and is shaped by multiple intersecting social and structural determinants. At individual levels, these include many personal, situational, and relational factors. Personal factors include but are not limited to care partners’ own physical and mental health and material resources (e.g., ability to pay for supplementary care). Situational and relational factors include care partners’ awareness (or lack thereof) of residents’ impending death and the quality of the caregiving relationship. AL and wider community-level factors include understaffing, staff turnover, inadequate hospice support, and lack of access to these services. We find that informal care partners navigate these caregiving challenges through a basic social process we conceptualize as “negotiating risks.” Strategies for easing caregiver burden and improving informal care partner and resident quality of life at end of life are implicated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document