A cognitive load approach to lie detection

2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 39-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aldert Vrij ◽  
Ronald Fisher ◽  
Samantha Mann ◽  
Sharon Leal
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Neequaye

This article critically examines the idea that cognitive load interventions can expose lies. I discuss the theoretical weaknesses of seven popular justifications of the cognitive load approach; for example, that liars must suppress the truth while lying, and this handicap makes lying challenging. Each of those seven justifications exhibits significant limitations. Moreover, the theoretical fitness of each justification is variable and unclear. A thematic review further indicated that researchers substantially rely on the customary seven justifications to support the cognitive load approach despite the shortcomings. This article proposes several research questions whose answers could help ascertain the theoretical fitness of the seven justifications and the cognitive load approach.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Verschuere ◽  
Nils Köbis ◽  
yoella meyer ◽  
David Gertler Rand ◽  
Shaul Shalvi

Lying typically requires greater mental effort than telling the truth. Imposing cognitive load may improve lie detection by limiting the cognitive resources needed to lie effectively, thereby increasing the difference in speed between truths and lies. We test this hypothesis meta-analytically. Across 21 studies using response-time (RT) paradigms (11 unpublished; total N = 792), we consistently found that truth telling was faster than lying, but found no evidence that imposing cognitive load increased that difference (Control, d = 1.45; Load, d = 1.28). Instead, load significantly decreased the lie-truth RT difference by increasing the RT of truths, g = -.18, p = .027. Our findings therefore suggest that imposing cognitive load does not necessarily improve RT-based lie detection, and may actually worsen it by taxing the mental system and thus impeding people’s ability to easily—and thus quickly—tell the truth


Author(s):  
Matthias Gamer ◽  
Kristina Suchotzki

Lying is a very complex behavior, occurring in different forms and situations. It requires the liar not only to constantly keep the perspective of the to-be-deceived person in mind, but at the same time to remember and activate the truth, prevent the truth from slipping out, and flexibly switch between the lie and the truth. The affective correlates of lying seem to range from guilt and the fear of being discovered to a delight after successfully getting away with a lie. Because of the observed variability in the affective correlates of lying, most recent research on lie detection has started to explore methods that are based on cognitive rather than affective processes. Those methods aim either to measure the increased cognitive load during lying, or to measure lying indirectly by assessing whether a suspect recognizes critical crime-related information.


2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 887-909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J. Walczyk ◽  
Diana A. Griffith ◽  
Rachel Yates ◽  
Shelley R. Visconte ◽  
Byron Simoneaux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aldert Vrij ◽  
Samantha A. Mann ◽  
Ronald P. Fisher ◽  
Sharon Leal ◽  
Rebecca Milne ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 1258-1277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan K. MacPherson

PurposeThe aim of this study was to determine the impact of cognitive load imposed by a speech production task on the speech motor performance of healthy older and younger adults. Response inhibition, selective attention, and working memory were the primary cognitive processes of interest.MethodTwelve healthy older and 12 healthy younger adults produced multiple repetitions of 4 sentences containing an embedded Stroop task in 2 cognitive load conditions: congruent and incongruent. The incongruent condition, which required participants to suppress orthographic information to say the font colors in which color words were written, represented an increase in cognitive load relative to the congruent condition in which word text and font color matched. Kinematic measures of articulatory coordination variability and movement duration as well as a behavioral measure of sentence production accuracy were compared between groups and conditions and across 3 sentence segments (pre-, during-, and post-Stroop).ResultsIncreased cognitive load in the incongruent condition was associated with increased articulatory coordination variability and movement duration, compared to the congruent Stroop condition, for both age groups. Overall, the effect of increased cognitive load was greater for older adults than younger adults and was greatest in the portion of the sentence in which cognitive load was manipulated (during-Stroop), followed by the pre-Stroop segment. Sentence production accuracy was reduced for older adults in the incongruent condition.ConclusionsIncreased cognitive load involving response inhibition, selective attention, and working memory processes within a speech production task disrupted both the stability and timing with which speech was produced by both age groups. Older adults' speech motor performance may have been more affected due to age-related changes in cognitive and motoric functions that result in altered motor cognition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document