A Critical Review of Cognitive Load Lie detection
This article critically examines the idea that cognitive load interventions can expose lies. I discuss the theoretical weaknesses of seven popular justifications of the cognitive load approach; for example, that liars must suppress the truth while lying, and this handicap makes lying challenging. Each of those seven justifications exhibits significant limitations. Moreover, the theoretical fitness of each justification is variable and unclear. A thematic review further indicated that researchers substantially rely on the customary seven justifications to support the cognitive load approach despite the shortcomings. This article proposes several research questions whose answers could help ascertain the theoretical fitness of the seven justifications and the cognitive load approach.