scholarly journals A study of raindrop size distribution during stratiform rain and development of its parameterization scheme in the framework of multi-parameter observations

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 254-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anal Chandra Sarma ◽  
Atri Deshamukhya ◽  
T. Narayana Rao ◽  
Sanjay Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Parameterization Scheme ◽  
Stratiform Rain ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Raindrop Size

scholarly journals Invariance of the Double-Moment Normalized Raindrop Size Distribution through 3D Spatial Displacement in Stratiform Rain

2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 1663-1680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy H. Raupach ◽  
Alexis Berne
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Vertical Displacement ◽  
Statistical Moments ◽  
Stratiform Rain ◽  
Vertical Range ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Double Moment ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Polarimetric Weather Radar ◽  
Using Data

AbstractDouble-moment normalization of the drop size distribution (DSD) summarizes the DSD in a compact way, using two of its statistical moments and a “generic” double-moment normalized DSD function. Results are presented of an investigation into the invariance of the double-moment normalized DSD through horizontal and vertical displacement in space, using data from disdrometers, vertically pointing K-band Micro Rain Radars, and an X-band polarimetric weather radar. The invariance of the double-moment normalized DSD is tested over a vertical range of up to 1.8 km and a horizontal range of up to approximately 100 km. The results suggest that for practical use, with well-chosen input moments, the double-moment normalized DSD can be assumed invariant in space in stratiform rain. The choice of moments used to characterize the DSD affects the amount of DSD variability captured by the normalization. It is shown that in stratiform rain, it is possible to capture more than 85% of the variability in DSD moments zero to seven using the technique. Most DSD variability in stratiform rain can thus be explained through the variability of two of its statistical moments. The results suggest similar behavior exists in transition and convective rain, but the limited data samples available do not allow for robust conclusions for these rain types. The results have implications for practical uses of double-moment DSD normalization, including the study of DSD variability and microphysics, DSD-retrieval algorithms, and DSD models used in rainfall retrieval.

scholarly journals Measurements of Rainfall Velocity and Raindrop Size Distribution Using Coherent Doppler Lidar

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 1949-1966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Aoki ◽  
Hironori Iwai ◽  
Katsuhiro Nakagawa ◽  
Shoken Ishii ◽  
Kohei Mizutani
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Wind Velocity ◽  
Vertical Wind ◽  
Doppler Spectrum ◽  
Doppler Lidar ◽  
Stratiform Rain ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Rain Events ◽  
Vertical Wind Velocity

AbstractRainfall velocity, raindrop size distribution (DSD), and vertical wind velocity were simultaneously observed with 2.05- and 1.54-μm coherent Doppler lidars during convective and stratiform rain events. A retrieval method is based on identifying two separate spectra from the convolution of the aerosol and precipitation Doppler lidar spectra. The vertical wind velocity was retrieved from the aerosol spectrum peak and then the terminal rainfall velocity corrected by the vertical air motion from the precipitation spectrum peak was obtained. The DSD was derived from the precipitation spectrum using the relationship between the raindrop size and the terminal rainfall velocity. A comparison of the 1-min-averaged rainfall velocity from Doppler lidar measurements at a minimum range and that from a collocated ground-based optical disdrometer revealed high correlation coefficients of over 0.89 for both convective and stratiform rain events. The 1-min-averaged DSDs retrieved from the Doppler lidar spectrum using parametric and nonparametric methods are also in good agreement with those measured with the optical disdrometer with a correlation coefficient of over 0.80 for all rain events. To retrieve the DSD, the parametric method assumes a mathematical function for the DSD and the nonparametric method computes the direct deconvolution of the measured Doppler lidar spectrum without assuming a DSD function. It is confirmed that the Doppler lidar can retrieve the rainfall velocity and DSD during relatively heavy rain, whereas the ratio of valid data significantly decreases in light rain events because it is extremely difficult to separate the overlapping rain and aerosol peaks in the Doppler spectrum.

scholarly journals Statistical Characteristics of Raindrop Size Distribution during Rainy Seasons in Northwest China

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Yong Zeng ◽  
Lianmei Yang ◽  
Zepeng Tong ◽  
Yufei Jiang ◽  
Zuyi Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Arid Regions ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Northwest China ◽  
Rainfall Rate ◽  
Statistical Characteristics ◽  
Stratiform Rain ◽  
Convective Rain ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Raindrop Size

Raindrop size distribution (DSD) is of great significance for understanding the microphysical process of rainfall and the quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE). However, in the past, there was a lack of relevant research on Xinjiang in the arid region of northwest China. In this study, the rainy season data collected by the disdrometer in the Yining area of Xinjiang were used for more than two years, and the characteristics of DSDs for all samples, for two rain types (convective and stratiform), and for six different rain rates were studied. The results showed that nearly 70% of the total samples had a rainfall rate of less than 1 mm·h−1, the convective rain was neither continental nor maritime, and there was a clear boundary between convective rain and stratiform rain in terms of the scattergram of the standardized intercept parameter ( log 10 N w ) versus the mass-weighted average diameter ( D m ). When the raindrop diameter was less than 0.7 mm, DSDs of the two rainfalls basically coincided, while when the raindrop diameter was greater than 0.7 mm, DSDs of convective rainfall were located above the stratiform rain. As the rainfall rate increased, D m increased, while log 10 N w first increased and then decreased. In addition, we deduced the Z − R (radar reflectivity-rain rate) relationship and μ − Λ relationship (shape parameter-slope parameter of the gamma DSDs) suitable for the Yining area. These conclusions are conducive to strengthening the understanding of rainfall microphysical processes in arid regions and improving the ability of QPE in arid regions.

Diagnosing the Intercept Parameter for Exponential Raindrop Size Distribution Based on Video Disdrometer Observations: Model Development

2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 2983-2992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guifu Zhang ◽  
Ming Xue ◽  
Qing Cao ◽  
Daniel Dawson
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Sampling Error ◽  
Model Development ◽  
Parameterization Scheme ◽  
Clear Correlation ◽  
Rainfall Estimation ◽  
Warm Rain ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Single Moment ◽  
Raindrop Size

Abstract The exponential distribution N(D) = N0 exp(−ΛD) with a fixed intercept parameter N0 is most commonly used to represent raindrop size distribution (DSD) in rainfall estimation and in single-moment bulk microphysics parameterization schemes. Disdrometer observations show that the intercept parameter is far from constant and systematically depends on the rain type and intensity. In this study, a diagnostic relation of N0 as a function of rainwater content W is derived based on two-dimensional video disdrometer (2DVD) measurements. The data reveal a clear correlation between N0 and W in which N0 increases as W increases. To minimize the effects of sampling error, a relation between two middle moments is used to derive the N0–W relation. This diagnostic relation has the potential to improve rainfall estimation and bulk microphysics parameterizations. A parameterization scheme for warm rain processes based on the diagnostic N0 DSD model is formulated and presented. The diagnostic N0-based parameterization scheme yields less evaporation and accretion for stratiform rain than that using fixed N0.

scholarly journals Analysis of the Vertical Air Motions and Raindrop Size Distribution Retrievals of a Squall Line Based on Cloud Radar Doppler Spectral Density Data

Atmosphere ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 348
Author(s):  
Ningkun Ma ◽  
Liping Liu ◽  
Yichen Chen ◽  
Yang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Spectral Density ◽  
Size Distribution ◽  
Squall Line ◽  
Vertical Profiles ◽  
Air Velocity ◽  
Density Data ◽  
Cloud Radar ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Reflectivity Factor

A squall line is a type of strongly organized mesoscale convective system that can cause severe weather disasters. Thus, it is crucial to explore the dynamic structure and hydrometeor distributions in squall lines. This study analyzed a squall line over Guangdong Province on 6 May 2016 that was observed using a Ka-band millimeter-wave cloud radar (CR) and an S-band dual-polarization radar (PR). Doppler spectral density data obtained by the CR were used to retrieve the vertical air motions and raindrop size distribution (DSD). The results showed the following: First, the CR detected detailed vertical profiles and their evolution before and during the squall line passage. In the convection time segment (segment B), heavy rain existed with a reflectivity factor exceeding 35 dBZ and a velocity spectrum width exceeding 1.3 m s−1. In the PR detection, the differential reflectivity factor (Zdr) was 1–2 dB, and the large specific differential phase (Kdp) also represented large liquid water content. In the transition and stratiform cloud time segments (segments B and C), the rain stabilized gradually, with decreasing cloud tops, stable precipitation, and a 0 °C layer bright band. Smaller Kdp values (less than 0.9) were distributed around the 0 °C layer, which may have been caused by the melting of ice crystal particles. Second, from the CR-retrieved vertical air velocity, before squall line passage, downdrafts dominated in local convection and weak updrafts existed in higher-altitude altostratus clouds. In segment B, the updraft air velocity reached more than 8 m s−1 below the 0 °C layer. From segments C to D, the updrafts changed gradually into weak and wide-ranging downdrafts. Third, in the comparison of DSD values retrieved at 1.5 km and DSD values on the ground, the retrieved DSD line was lower than the disdrometer, the overall magnitude of the DSD retrieved was smaller, and the difference decreased from segments C to D. The standardized intercept parameter (Nw) and shape parameter (μ) of the DSD retrieved at 1.8 km showed good agreement with the disdrometer results, and the mass-weighted mean diameter (Dm) was smaller than that on the ground, but very close to the PR-retrieved Dm result at 2 km. Therefore, comparing with the DSD retrieved at around 2 km, the overall number concentration remained unchanged and Dm got larger on the ground, possibly reflecting the process of raindrop coalescence. Lastly, the average vertical profiles of several quantities in all segments showed that, first of all, the decrease of Nw and Dm with height in segments C and D was similar, reflecting the collision effect of falling raindrops. The trends were opposite in segment B, indicating that raindrops underwent intense mixing and rapid collision and growth in this segment. Then, PR-retrieved Dm profiles can verify the rationality of the CR-retrieved Dm. Finally, a vertical velocity profile peak generated a larger Dm especially in segments C and D.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document