The Impact of Enriched Resistant Starch Type‐2 Cookies on the Gut Microbiome in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 2100374
Author(s):  
Julie Ann Kemp ◽  
Bruna Regis Paiva ◽  
Henrique Fragoso dos Santos ◽  
Hugo Emiliano Jesus ◽  
Hannah Craven ◽  
...  
10.2196/23679 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Laranja Gomes Rodrigues ◽  
Gisele Silvestre Belber ◽  
Frederica Valle De Queiroz Padilha ◽  
Frederico Rafael Moreira ◽  
Marcos Aurélio Maeyama ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Payal Agarwal ◽  
Geetha Mukerji ◽  
Laura Desveaux ◽  
Noah M Ivers ◽  
Onil Bhattacharyya ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND As the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus has put pressure on health systems to appropriately manage these patients, there have been a growing number of mobile apps designed to improve the self-management of diabetes. One such app, BlueStar, has been shown to significantly reduce hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels in small studies and is the first app in the United States to receive Food and Drug Administration approval as a mobile prescription therapy. However, the impact of the app across real-world population among different clinical sites and health systems remains unclear. OBJECTIVE The primary objective of this study was to conduct a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of the BlueStar mobile app to determine if app usage leads to improved HbA1c levels among diverse participants in real-life clinical contexts. We hypothesized that this mobile app would improve self-management and HbA1c levels compared with controls. METHODS The study consisted of a multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Overall, 110 participants randomized to the immediate treatment group (ITG) received the intervention for 6 months, and 113 participants randomized to the wait-list control (WLC) group received usual care for the first 3 months and then received the intervention for 3 months. The primary outcome was glucose control measured by HbA1c levels at 3 months. Secondary outcomes assessed intervention impact on patient self-management, experience of care, and self-reported health utilization using validated scales, including the Problem Areas in Diabetes, the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities, and the EuroQol-5D. Intervention usage data were collected directly from the app. RESULTS The results of an analysis of covariance controlling for baseline HbA1c levels did not show evidence of intervention impact on HbA1c levels at 3 months (mean difference [ITG−WLC] −0.42, 95% CI −1.05 to 0.21; P=.19). Similarly, there was no intervention effect on secondary outcomes measuring diabetes self-efficacy, quality of life, and health care utilization behaviors. An exploratory analysis of 57 ITG participants investigating the impact of app usage on HbA1c levels showed that each additional day of app use corresponded with a 0.016-point decrease in participants’ 3-month HbA1c levels (95% CI −0.03 to −0.003). App usage varied significantly by site, as participants from 1 site logged in to the app a median of 36 days over 14 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 10.5-124); those at another site used the app significantly less (median 9; IQR 6-51). CONCLUSIONS The results showed no difference between intervention and control arms for the primary clinical outcome of glycemic control measured by HbA1c levels. Although there was low usage of the app among participants, results indicate contextual factors, particularly site, had a significant impact on overall usage. Future research into the patient and site-specific factors that increase app utilization are needed. CLINICALTRIAL Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02813343; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02813343 (Archived by WebCite at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02813343)


Trials ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Corrine I Voils ◽  
Cynthia J Coffman ◽  
David Edelman ◽  
Matthew L Maciejewski ◽  
Janet M Grubber ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document