scholarly journals Deep learning modeling using normal mammograms for predicting breast cancer risk

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dooman Arefan ◽  
Aly A. Mohamed ◽  
Wendie A. Berg ◽  
Margarita L. Zuley ◽  
Jules H. Sumkin ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (578) ◽  
pp. eaba4373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Yala ◽  
Peter G. Mikhael ◽  
Fredrik Strand ◽  
Gigin Lin ◽  
Kevin Smith ◽  
...  

Improved breast cancer risk models enable targeted screening strategies that achieve earlier detection and less screening harm than existing guidelines. To bring deep learning risk models to clinical practice, we need to further refine their accuracy, validate them across diverse populations, and demonstrate their potential to improve clinical workflows. We developed Mirai, a mammography-based deep learning model designed to predict risk at multiple timepoints, leverage potentially missing risk factor information, and produce predictions that are consistent across mammography machines. Mirai was trained on a large dataset from Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) in the United States and tested on held-out test sets from MGH, Karolinska University Hospital in Sweden, and Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH) in Taiwan, obtaining C-indices of 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.74 to 0.80), 0.81 (0.79 to 0.82), and 0.79 (0.79 to 0.83), respectively. Mirai obtained significantly higher 5-year ROC AUCs than the Tyrer-Cuzick model (P < 0.001) and prior deep learning models Hybrid DL (P < 0.001) and Image-Only DL (P < 0.001), trained on the same dataset. Mirai more accurately identified high-risk patients than prior methods across all datasets. On the MGH test set, 41.5% (34.4 to 48.5) of patients who would develop cancer within 5 years were identified as high risk, compared with 36.1% (29.1 to 42.9) by Hybrid DL (P = 0.02) and 22.9% (15.9 to 29.6) by the Tyrer-Cuzick model (P < 0.001).


Author(s):  
Stijn De Buck ◽  
Jeroen Bertels ◽  
Chelsey Vanbilsen ◽  
Tanguy Dewaele ◽  
Chantal Van Ongeval ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. e0231653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne C. Wetstein ◽  
Allison M. Onken ◽  
Christina Luffman ◽  
Gabrielle M. Baker ◽  
Michael E. Pyle ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 294 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Dembrower ◽  
Yue Liu ◽  
Hossein Azizpour ◽  
Martin Eklund ◽  
Kevin Smith ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 292 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Yala ◽  
Constance Lehman ◽  
Tal Schuster ◽  
Tally Portnoi ◽  
Regina Barzilay

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 98
Author(s):  
João Mendes ◽  
Nuno Matela

Breast cancer affects thousands of women across the world, every year. Methods to predict risk of breast cancer, or to stratify women in different risk levels, could help to achieve an early diagnosis, and consequently a reduction of mortality. This paper aims to review articles that extracted texture features from mammograms and used those features along with machine learning algorithms to assess breast cancer risk. Besides that, deep learning methodologies that aimed for the same goal were also reviewed. In this work, first, a brief introduction to breast cancer statistics and screening programs is presented; after that, research done in the field of breast cancer risk assessment are analyzed, in terms of both methodologies used and results obtained. Finally, considerations about the analyzed papers are conducted. The results of this review allow to conclude that both machine and deep learning methodologies provide promising results in the field of risk analysis, either in a stratification in risk groups, or in a prediction of a risk score. Although promising, future endeavors in this field should consider the possibility of the implementation of the methodology in clinical practice.


Radiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 211446
Author(s):  
Min Sun Bae ◽  
Hyug-Gi Kim

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document