Improved diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) in stroke using sensitivity encoding (SENSE)

2001 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 548-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland Bammer ◽  
Stephen L. Keeling ◽  
Michael Augustin ◽  
Klaas P. Pruessmann ◽  
Roswitha Wolf ◽  
...  
1998 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 440-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Amano ◽  
T. Kumazaki ◽  
M. Ishihara

Single-shot spin-echo diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging using a phased-array multicoil was performed to distinguish between normal and cirrhotic livers. Sets of 6 images with different b-values were acquired with breathholding. Significant differences were observed between controls and cirrhosis cases in the signal ratios when the b-value was 383 s/mm2, and apparent diffusion coefficients.


2020 ◽  
pp. 20200427
Author(s):  
Gabrielle C Baxter ◽  
Andrew J Patterson ◽  
Ramona Woitek ◽  
Iris Allajbeu ◽  
Martin J Graves ◽  
...  

Objective: To compare diffusion-weighted images (DWI) acquired using single-shot echo-planar imaging (ss-EPI) and multiplexed sensitivity encoding (MUSE) in breast cancer. Methods 20 females with pathologically confirmed breast cancer (age 51 ± 12 years) were imaged with ss-EPI-DWI and MUSE-DWI. ADC, normalised ADC (nADC), blur and distortion metrics and qualitative image quality scores were compared. The Crété-Roffet and Mattes mutual information metrics were used to evaluate blurring and distortion, respectively. In a breast phantom, six permutations of MUSE-DWI with varying parallel acceleration factor and number of shots were compared. Differences in ADC and nADC were compared using the coefficient of variation in the phantom and a paired t-test in patients. Differences in blur, distortion and qualitative metrics were analysed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: There was a low coefficient of variation (<2%) in ADC between ss-EPI-DWI and all MUSE-DWI permutations acquired using the phantom. 22 malignant and three benign lesions were identified in 20 patients. ADC values measured using MUSE were significantly lower compared to ss-EPI for malignant but not benign lesions (p < 0.001, p = 0.21). nADC values were not significantly different (p = 0.62, p = 0.28). Blurring and distortion improved with number of shots and acceleration factor, and significantly improved with MUSE in patients (p < 0.001, p = 0.002). Qualitatively, image quality improved using MUSE. Conclusion: MUSE improves the image quality of breast DWI compared to ss-EPI. Advances in knowledge: MUSE-DWI has superior image quality and reduced blurring and distortion compared to ss-EPI-DWI in breast cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document