scholarly journals No need to detune transmitters in 32‐channel receiver arrays at 7 T

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Gosselink ◽  
Hans Hoogduin ◽  
Martijn Froeling ◽  
Dennis W. J. Klomp
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (12) ◽  
pp. 3392-3404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linxiao Zhang ◽  
Harish Krishnaswamy

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack H. Cole

Abstract High-resolution subsurface seismic imaging that places sources and receivers in wellbores is an emerging exploration technology that can help petroleum companies find and recover more oil and gas. Successful commercialization of this enabling technology requires the development of receiver arrays that can couple fifty or more three-component sensor modules to the wellbore in a reliable manner. Although electrical clamping systems have been successfully used in small arrays, hydraulic clamping is required for more than ten modules. Both inflatable-bladder and cylinder-actuated clamp arrays have been designed However, when arrays must operate in 200° C environments, elastomer bladders become unsuitable. Research at the University of Arkansas has produced a failsafe fluid power system design makes feasible the successful development of large seismic sensor arrays that can operate in deep well bores.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junwen Dai ◽  
Ahmed Elsayed Fouda

Abstract Early detection of corrosion in well casings is of great importance to oil and gas well management. A typical well completion includes a production tubing inside a number of nested casings, which provide necessary well integrity and environmental protections. A multifrequency electromagnetic pipe inspection tool with multiple transmitter and receiver arrays was designed to accurately estimate the individual wall thicknesses of up to five nested pipes. The tool uses an axis-symmetric forward model to invert for wall thicknesses, among other pipe parameters. However, in cases where production occurs from two or more segregated zones, the well is generally equipped with more than one production tubing, which breaks the axial symmetry. In this paper, we show how the tool can further be employed to inspect the integrity of non-nested tubulars, such as dual completions. The performance of the tool is demonstrated using a full-scale yard mockup with known defects. A data-processing workflow, including multizone calibration and model-based inversion, is proposed to estimate the tubulars electrical conductivity, magnetic permeability, wall thickness, and eccentricity. An in-situ, multizone calibration method is applied to remove adjacent tubings influence, thus enabling accurate estimation of the thickness of outer casings without having to pull out the production tubing. In order to demonstrate the capabilities of the tool in wells with dual completions, a log was run in a 150 ft-long yard mockup with two strings of 2⅞ inch. tubing, two outer casing strings, and four different man-made defects on the casings. The tool is logged inside each of the tubing strings, and the two logs are inverted for the thickness and eccentricity of the tubing as well as the thickness of outer casings. Results from the yard test reveal that when the tool is logged in one tubing, it can accurately detect various kinds of defects on outer casings, even in the presence of a second tubing. The interference from the second tubing is shown to be minimal due to the employed calibration algorithm. A high degree of consistency is seen between the logs run in each tubing string. This suggests that if the goal is solely to monitor corrosion in the outer casings, it suffices to run the tool in only one of the tubing strings, further cutting nonproductive time. The techniques presented here enable pipe integrity monitoring without pulling the production tubings; tubings, therefore, minimizing inspection time and cost. The information provided by this tool can significantly improve the efficiency of well intervention operations, especially in areas with high corrosion rates.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasanta M. Yeluru ◽  
Gregory S. Baker ◽  
Choon B. Park ◽  
Larry A. Taylor

Geophysics ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 54 (10) ◽  
pp. 1306-1317 ◽  
Author(s):  
David F. Aldridge

Seismic‐receiver arrays implemented under typical field conditions are subject to a variety of perturbing influences. The array responses that are actually achieved differ, perhaps substantially, from the nominal response associated with ideal conditions (precise positioning, vertical plants, identical geophones, perfect ground coupling, etc.). Variations in receiver array response may degrade the effectiveness of multichannel processing and analysis schemes that rely upon channel‐to‐channel waveform constancy. In effect, array‐response variation is a form of noise added to recorded waveforms and is thus potentially harmful. A rigorous physical treatment of the response of a geophone array to incident plane‐wave elastic radiation forms the point of departure for assessing the importance of response perturbations. The hard‐wired multiple seismometer group, long transmission line, and recording‐system input impedance are considered an electromechanical system. An individual geophone may have arbitrarily specified position and axial orientation and is modeled as a ground‐motion transducer that incorporates, to first order, the effect of compliant coupling to the earth. Elastic waves (of either vibratory mode) can be incident from any direction. This generality built into the mathematical description of receiver‐array response allows numerous array types (including those designed to record shear waves) to be analyzed. All parameters that determine the response value are then subjected to controlled random perturbations in order to evaluate the statistical variability of the complex valued array‐response function. Transformation of the perturbed responses to the time domain indicates the extent of waveform variability induced by geophone‐array diversity. Computational studies indicate that, for vertical or near‐vertical plane P‐wave incidence, reasonable variations in the controlling parameters do not reduce waveform coherence by any major amount. Peak times of reflection signal recorded on well planted geophone arrays typically vary by up to 4 ms. As the angle of incidence increases or the quality of the field‐array implementation degrades, the wavelets exhibit increasing amplitude loss, wave‐shape alteration, and incoherence that may affect an interpretation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document