scholarly journals Assessing stable validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the individualized supported employment fidelity scale: A replication

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sosei Yamaguchi ◽  
Sayaka Sato ◽  
Yasutaka Ojio ◽  
Takuma Shiozawa ◽  
Asami Matsunaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Supported Employment ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Fidelity Scale

Individualized Supported Employment Fidelity Scale--Japanese Version

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natsuki Sasaki ◽  
Sosei Yamaguchi ◽  
Michiyo Shimodaira ◽  
Sayaka Sato ◽  
Ayano Taneda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Supported Employment ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Fidelity Scale

A Systems Study on Interprofessional Collaboration in Healthcare

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 93-108
Author(s):  
Hironobu Matsushita ◽  
Carole Orchard ◽  
Katsumi Fujitani ◽  
Kaori Ichikawa
Keyword(s):  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Face Validity ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Alpha Coefficient ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Team Collaboration ◽  
Interprofessional Team ◽  
Excellent Internal Consistency ◽  
Acute Healthcare

This study aims to translate and adapt the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale II (AITCS-II) cross-culturally for effective and systemic use in Japan, to describe floor and ceiling values, and to examine in terms of such criteria as reliability and face and content validity. The AITCS-II was translated from English into Japanese to develop the Japanese version of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale II (hereinafter referred to AITCS-II-J). Then, cross-sectional and cross-professional data analyses were carried out to seek evidence of construct validity. Analysis demonstrated good content and face validity. With a Cronbach's alpha coefficient greater than 0.9 (r varied from 0.912 to 0.940), the AITCS-II-J exhibited excellent internal consistency. The AITCS-II-J showed evidence of acceptable validity and reliability; therefore, this measurement system will be useful for informing the enhancement of interprofessional team collaboration within the Japanese acute healthcare context.

scholarly journals The Japanese version of the questionnaire about the process of recovery: development and validity and reliability testing

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Akiko Kanehara ◽  
Risa Kotake ◽  
Yuki Miyamoto ◽  
Yousuke Kumakura ◽  
Kentaro Morita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Internal Consistency Reliability ◽  
Validity And Reliability

Abstract Background Personal recovery is increasingly recognised as an important outcome measure in mental health services. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR-J) and test its validity and reliability. Methods The study comprised two stages that employed the cross-sectional and prospective cohort designs, respectively. We translated the questionnaire using a standard translation/back-translation method. Convergent validity was examined by calculating Pearson’s correlation coefficients with scores on the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) and the Short-Form-8 Health Survey (SF-8). An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to examine factorial validity. We used intraclass correlation and Cronbach’s alpha to examine the test-retest and internal consistency reliability of the QPR-J’s 22-item full scale, 17-item intrapersonal and 5-item interpersonal subscales. We conducted an EFA along with a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results Data were obtained from 197 users of mental health services (mean age: 42.0 years; 61.9% female; 49.2% diagnosed with schizophrenia). The QPR-J showed adequate convergent validity, exhibiting significant, positive correlations with the RAS and SF-8 scores. The QPR-J’s full version, subscales, showed excellent test-retest and internal consistency reliability, with the exception of acceptable but relatively low internal consistency reliability for the interpersonal subscale. Based on the results of the CFA and EFA, we adopted the factor structure extracted from the original 2-factor model based on the present CFA. Conclusion The QPR-J is an adequately valid and reliable measure of the process of recovery among Japanese users with mental health services.

scholarly journals Preliminary examination of reliability and validity of the Japanese child anxiety impact scale-parent version in Japanese community sample

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sho Okawa ◽  
Honami Arai ◽  
Hideki Nakamura ◽  
Yuko Urao ◽  
Tessa Reardon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Community Sample ◽  
Child Anxiety ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Theory Model ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Impact Scale ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Parent Version

AbstractThe child anxiety impact scale-parent version (CAIS-P) is a useful measure to assess the impact of anxiety on a child’s daily life; however, a Japanese version of the CAIS-P has not been developed, and whether the CAIS-P can be utilized in Eastern countries remains unascertained. The purpose of this study was to develop a Japanese version of the CAIS-P and examine its reliability and validity. Parents of 400 children (aged 7 to 15 years) from the Japanese community completed the CAIS-P. A confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the factor structure of the original CAIS-P, consisting of school activity, social activity, and home/family activity factors, provided a good fit for the Japanese version of the CAIS-P. Estimated Spearman’s correlation coefficients showed moderate correlations between the total and factor scores of the CAIS-P, anxiety symptoms (Spence Child Anxiety Scale-parent version), and depressive symptoms (Child Depression Inventory). Furthermore, the item response theory model revealed that each factor of the CAIS-P is a high information reliable measure for children with high trait anxiety. These results provide support for the Japanese version of the CAIS-P’s factorial validity, convergent validity, and reliability and its potential for application in child anxiety research in Japan.

The Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. e267-e273
Author(s):  
Haruhiko Hoshino ◽  
Yujiro Matsuishi ◽  
Yuki Enomoto ◽  
Nobutake Shimojo ◽  
Takahiro Kido ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Japanese Version ◽  
Validity And Reliability

Validity and Reliability of Japanese Version of the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aya Yamamoto-Kon ◽  
Hiroki Fukahori ◽  
Yasuko Ogata ◽  
Midori Nagano
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Ulcer ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Knowledge Assessment ◽  
Validity And Reliability

scholarly journals Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the CARE Measure in a general medicine outpatient setting

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Aomatsu ◽  
H. Abe ◽  
K. Abe ◽  
H. Yasui ◽  
T. Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Medicine ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Care Measure

Dimensions of supported employment: Factor structure of the IPS fidelity scale

2001 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary R. Bond, Kathleen M. Vogler, Sandra
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Supported Employment ◽  
Fidelity Scale
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document