High-dose treatment for malignant rhabdoid tumor of the kidney: No evidence for improved survival-The Gesellschaft für Pädiatrische Onkologie und Hämatologie (GPOH) experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. e26746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhoikos Furtwängler ◽  
Leo Kager ◽  
Patrick Melchior ◽  
Christian Rübe ◽  
Martin Ebinger ◽  
...  
1994 ◽  
Vol 2 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 159
Author(s):  
S. Stremetzne ◽  
U. Jaehde ◽  
J. Beyer ◽  
J. Steuer ◽  
W. Siegert ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 164 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven R. Hirsch ◽  
Thomas R. E. Barnes

There has been increasing public concern about the risks of high-dose antipsychotic (neuroleptic) treatment, arising in part from an, as yet unproven, association between high-dose treatment and death in a small minority of patients. The clinical issues related to the use of neuroleptics in doses exceeding the maximum recommended in theBritish National Formulary(BNF) were discussed at the Psychopharmacology Subcommittee. When, if ever, should the recommended doses be exceeded?


Dermatology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 204 (3) ◽  
pp. 214-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.C.M. van de Kerkhof ◽  
C. Green ◽  
K.J. Hamberg ◽  
P.E. Hutchinson ◽  
J.K. Jensen ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14580-e14580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharad A. Ghamande ◽  
Daniel Platt ◽  
Donna Wheatley ◽  
Bunja Jane Rungruang ◽  
John Edward Janik ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 336-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Candinas ◽  
Beth-Ann Lesnikoski ◽  
Simon C. Robson ◽  
Tsukasa Miyatake ◽  
Susanne M. Scesney ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 2022-2034 ◽  
Author(s):  
D C Ihde ◽  
J L Mulshine ◽  
B S Kramer ◽  
S M Steinberg ◽  
R I Linnoila ◽  
...  

PURPOSE We performed a prospective randomized clinical trial to determine whether higher doses of etoposide and cisplatin (EP) yield more complete responses or longer survival in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Ninety patients with previously untreated extensive-stage SCLC fulfilled criteria for randomization to standard-dose versus high-dose EP. Another 25 patients at risk of excessive toxicity from high-dose treatment were given standard-dose therapy. During cycles 1 and 2 of EP, patients on standard-dose treatment received intravenous etoposide 80 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks; high-dose treatment consisted of etoposide 80 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5 and cisplatin 27 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5 every 3 weeks. All patients received standard-dose EP in cycles 3 and 4. In cycles 5 through 8, completely responding patients continued standard-dose EP; all other patients received either cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine, or (if possible) a combination drug program based on in vitro drug sensitivity testing of tumor-cell lines established from individual patients. RESULTS Despite 68% higher doses and a 46% higher dose-rate intensity actually given to patients randomized to receive high-dose relative to those randomized to receive standard-dose EP, complete response rates (23% v 22%; P = .99) and median survival durations (10.7 and 11.4 months, respectively; P = .68) were virtually identical. Complete responses occurred in 4% of patients and the median survival duration was 5.8 months in nonrandomized patients. Leukopenia (P < .0001), thrombocytopenia (P < .0001), febrile neutropenia (P = .01), and weight loss (P = .02) were significantly more common in patients randomized to receive high-dose compared with standard-dose EP. CONCLUSION No therapeutic benefits resulted from increasing planned doses by 67% for the first two cycles of EP in patients with extensive-stage SCLC. Higher doses were associated with substantially worse toxicities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document