How I approach disease‐modifying therapy in children with sickle cell disease in an era of novel therapies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristine Karkoska ◽  
Patrick T. McGann
Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2969-2969
Author(s):  
Arrey-Takor Ayuk-Arrey ◽  
Isha Darbari ◽  
Allistair Abraham ◽  
Robert Sheppard Nickel

Abstract Background: Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) using an HLA-identical sibling donor is a well-established cure for sickle cell disease (SCD). Historically, HSCT was only offered to patients with SCD who had suffered severe complications; however, given improved HSCT outcomes, it is now reasonable to consider HSCT for most patients with SCD who have an HLA-identical sibling. Thus, HLA typing of all full siblings of patients with SCD should be a clinical priority to ensure patients are aware of and have access to this therapeutic option. The primary objectives of this study are to describe the baseline prevalence of HLA typing among a cohort of hospitalized pediatric patients with SCD and to evaluate whether having had HLA typing is associated with certain characteristics. Secondarily, the study describes the acceptability of HLA typing among patients with a healthy (non-SCD) full sibling who had not already had HLA typing at baseline after dedicated outreach to these families. Methods: Between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020 a REDCap database of all hospitalized patients with SCD was prospectively maintained. Patient demographic and clinical information was abstracted via retrospective chart review. To evaluate socioeconomic status, a neighborhood area deprivation index (ADI) was determined for each patient using their home address and the Neighborhood Atlas website (https://www.neighborhoodatlas.medicine.wisc.edu/). ADI is a validated ranking (0-100) of Census Block Groups, considering income, education, employment, and housing quality. A higher ADI represents greater socioeconomic disadvantage. As part of a clinical outreach initiative, patients' families who had not already had typing at the time of their hospitalization were contacted to determine if the patient has a healthy full sibling and, if applicable, offer sibling HLA typing. This outreach was originally planned to occur in person at the time of hospitalization or clinic follow-up, but due the COVID-19 pandemic it was paused and when resumed conducted mostly via telephone. Results: During the 52-week study period, 291 patients with SCD were hospitalized at the study pediatric institution. Seventy-one patients (24%) had already completed HLA typing at the time of their first hospitalization during the study period. These patients with HLA typing at baseline were significantly more likely to have a diagnosis of sickle cell anemia (HbSS/HbSβ 0 genotype) and be on disease-modifying therapy (hydroxyurea or chronic transfusion) compared to patients without typing at baseline (Table). Age and sex were not significantly different between patients with and without typing (Table). The group of patients who did not have HLA typing at baseline had a significantly greater ADI (mean 29.7 vs. 24.0, p=.008) and proportion of patients with a high disadvantage ADI score ≥40 (23% vs. 10%, p=.02), Figure. Of the 220 patients with no history of HLA typing, the sibling status of 187 patients was determined via outreach to these families as of July 2021. Among these 187 patients, 81 (43%) reported having a healthy full sibling. Among these 81 patients with siblings, after being offered family HLA typing, 42 (52%) were interested and referred for HLA typing, 29 (36%) were undecided, and 10 (12%) declined typing. Conclusion: Hospitalized pediatric patients with SCD who had already been HLA typed were more likely to have a severe SCD genotype and be on disease-modifying therapy as expected. Patients who had not had HLA typing were more likely to live in a socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhood. This finding suggests that dedicated outreach to all families regarding HLA typing is needed. Our clinical initiative to offer typing to all hospitalized patients with healthy full siblings was feasible, with a majority of families interested in pursuing HLA typing. Continued work is needed to ensure patients with SCD have equal access to curative therapy regardless of socioeconomic status. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 15-16
Author(s):  
Sharjeel Syed ◽  
Jihad Aljabban ◽  
Jonathan Trujillo ◽  
Saad Syed ◽  
Robert Cameron ◽  
...  

Background: The pathogenesis of sickle cell disease (SCD) and its complications have been well characterized down to the molecular level. However, there remains a relative dearth of disease modifying therapies that reduce the frequency and number of vas-occlusive crises, hospitalizations, and deaths. Recent advancements in utilizing hydroxyurea and L-glutamine, which both impact unique disease pathways, should pave way for the identification of other molecular pathways as ideal drug targets. In this regard, our meta-analysis serves to identify key genes and associated pathways that are differentially expressed in SC patients. Methods: We employed our STARGEO platform to tag samples from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus and performed meta-analysis to compare SC and healthy control transcriptomes. For the meta-analysis, we tagged 285 peripheral blood samples from SC patients and 86 samples from healthy subjects as a control. We then analyzed the signature in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis to elucidate top disease functions from our analysis. Results: From our meta-analysis, we identified iron homeostasis signaling, NRF2-mediated oxidative stress response, cell senescence, and pyrimidine interconversion/biosynthesis as top canonical pathways that were upregulated in the peripheral blood samples from SC patients. Top upstream regulators included membrane associated protein and transporter ABCB6, non-coding RNY3, and erythroid maturation transcription factors GATA1, KLF1, and HIPK2 (with predicted activation). The most upregulated genes included inflammatory modulators RNF182 and IFI27, the latter of which has been shown to inhibit vascular endothelial growth and repair. Several membrane-associated protein coding genes such as GYPA, RAP1GAP, and PAQR9 were also upregulated in the SC samples. RAP1GAP is known to modulate neutrophil cell adhesion and homing while PAQR9 has roles in regulating protein quality control: a role also seen in similarly upregulated YOD1, a deubiquitinating enzyme involved in trafficking of misfolded proteins. Expectedly, also upregulated were HBBP1 and SOX6, which regulate globin genes and have been shown to silence γ-globin expression. Lastly, SLC6A19, the neutral amino acid transporter mutated in Hartnup disease, was also upregulated. Of the downregulated genes, WASF3, a member of the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein family, has been linked to poor survival in many malignancies, including AML and CMML, but has not previously been linked to SCD pathogenesis. ENKUR was also downregulated and has been annotated as a tethering protein to cation channels as well as linked to pathways involving vascular leakage. SIGLEC10, which binds to vascular adhesion proteins, is a key suppressor of inflammatory responses to damage; it's downregulation along with ELAPOR1, a transmembrane protein involved in cellular response to stress, was also observed. Finally, based off the focus genes in our analysis we identified several networks with most being involved in amino acid metabolism, cellular assembly, function, and maintenance, hematological disease, and organismal injury. The top pathway is illustrated in Figure 1. Conclusions: Our study illustrates differentially expressed gene activity in SCD consistent with known pathophysiology such as immune response, endothelial damage and adherence, heme metabolism, and globin regulation. We also showed evidence of genes not previously studied in SCD, which may have novel roles such as those part of the ubiquitin-proteasome system like YOD1 and RNF182. Additionally, while some genes in our analysis like EKLF and GAT1 have been shown to enhance δ-globin expression, paving way for possible drug therapies for B-hemoglobinopathies, others like IFI27, PAQR9, RAP1GAP, ENKUR, SIGLEC10, WASF3, and SOX9 have yet to be studied as mediators of disease pathogenesis in SCD. A target to SOX9, a known suppressor of γ-globin, or ABCB6, a known modulator of erythroid cell shape and hydration, have particularly promising potential as disease modifying therapies. Finally, HIPK2, HBBP1, and SLC6A19 have previously been shown to have intriguing effects on hydroxyurea dosing and responsivity in SC patients and may also be candidate target molecules to enhance existing therapies. These data identify potential candidate pathways for mechanistic studies seeking to confirm a causative role in the pathogenesis of sickle cell disease. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. e0178413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitya Bakshi ◽  
Cynthia B. Sinha ◽  
Diana Ross ◽  
Kirshma Khemani ◽  
George Loewenstein ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 856-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mandy David ◽  
Christopher Carroll ◽  
Ashley Lauriello ◽  
Benjamin Salzberg ◽  
Sophie Lanzkron

Abstract Background: The management of pain in adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) is complex, with the intermingling of both acute vaso-occlusive events and chronic daily pain. Sixty percent of adults with SCD suffer with every day chronic pain. In patients with frequent acute visits we use aggressive disease modifying therapy to decrease the risk of VOC yet there remains a subset of patients who continue to have frequent acute visits for pain. In addition, there are patients maintained on high doses of oral opioids as outpatients who continue to have high levels of daily pain. There is little data that escalating doses of opioids is associated with benefit, yet significant data to support that higher doses are associated with harms. We consider these to be cases of opioid failure. Identifying therapies for these patients that improve quality of life is essential. Buprenorphine is a partial mu opioid receptor agonist and kappa antagonist, and has a very high affinity for the mu receptors, with an elimination half-life of 28-37 hours for the sublingual administration. The reduced risk of overdose, lower risk for misuse, diminished withdrawal symptoms, and blunting of opioid craving make it an appealing alternative to full opioid agonists in a subset of patients with SCD who continue to have significant pain or are unable to wean off of ineffective opioid therapy. The purpose of this report is to describe our experience converting patients with SCD and chronic pain from chronic opioid therapy to buprenorphine. Methods: Routine clinical care in our clinic includes offering buprenorphine transition to patients on chronic opioid therapy with numerous acute care visits despite the use of disease modifying therapy; or patients on chronic opioid therapy reporting significant ongoing pain. Patients are typically weaned to lower opioid doses (goal 90 oral morphine equivalents) prior to the planned induction with buprenorphine. Once patients are at the goal dose, they are asked to hold opioids for 12-24 hours prior to presentation so that they are in at least mild opioid withdrawal prior to their first dose of buprenorphine to avoid precipitated withdrawal. The patient is assessed with the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWs) and if their score is 5 or higher they are administered their first dose of sublingual buprenorphine. If COWs scores are less than 5, buprenorphine is not initiated and the subject is asked to return the following day or earlier if withdrawal symptoms begin. Patients are reassessed with the COWs and dosed with buprenorphine hourly until withdrawal has ceased. The dose needed to minimize withdrawal is considered the working total daily dose. Patients are sent home and return the next day to start their once daily dose of buprenorphine. Urine toxicology testing is done the day of planned induction. Data on acute visits 6 months prior and 6 months post induction and on complications associated with induction were pulled from the electronic health record. Results: 21 patients have been converted from full agonist opioids to buprenorphine from 3/2015-6/1/2018. The average age of the patients at the time of induction was 36.1 years (SD 9.1), 62% were female. Sixteen (76 %) of the patients had sickle cell anemia, the remainder had variant genotypes. The mean dose (in morphine equivalents) of full agonist opioid that patients were on prior to weaning of opioids was 196.8 mg (SD 222.7) and just prior to induction was 85 mg (SD 70 mg) with a range of 11.4 to 315 mg. Seventeen patients tolerated the induction without any complications, 2 patients had abdominal cramps but were successfully converted, 2 patients has adverse reactions (1 had numbness of tongue and 1 with worsening of asthma) and buprenorphine was stopped. Of the 19 patients successfully converted, two chose to stop buprenorphine and resume taking full opioid agonists. For the 13 patients with 6 months of follow-up post induction, the median number of acute care visits prior to induction was 12.5 and post was 4.0 (Figure). Conclusions: Adults with sickle cell disease on chronic full agonist opioid therapy can be safely converted to buprenorphine. Acute care utilization has dropped significantly for patients post induction. Assessment of patient reported outcomes such as quality of life and pain interference are being collected. Buprenorphine appears to be a safe and effective medication in the management of pain in adults with SCD. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Lanzkron: PCORI: Research Funding; GBT: Research Funding; Prolong: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; selexys: Research Funding; NHLBI: Research Funding; HRSA: Research Funding; Ironwood: Research Funding.


2020 ◽  
Vol 245 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-165
Author(s):  
Madeleine Lu ◽  
Minke AE Rab ◽  
Sergey S Shevkoplyas ◽  
Vivien A Sheehan

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common inherited blood disorder, affecting approximately 100,000 patients in the U.S. and millions more worldwide. Patients with SCD experience a wide range of clinical complications, including frequent pain crises, stroke, and early mortality, all originating from a single-point mutation in the β-globin subunit. The RBC changes resulting from the sickle mutation lead to a host of rheological abnormalities that diminish microvascular blood flow, and produce severe anemia due to RBC hemolysis, and ischemia from vaso-occlusion initiated by sticky, rigid sickle RBCs. While the pathophysiology and mechanisms of SCD have been investigated for many years, therapies to treat the disease are limited. In addition to RBC transfusion, there are only two US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs to ameliorate SCD complications: hydroxyurea (HU) and L-glutamine (Endari™). The only curative therapy currently available is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), which is generally reserved for individuals with a matched related donor, comprising only 10–15% of the total SCD population. Potentially curative advanced gene therapy approaches for SCD are under investigation in ongoing clinical trials. The ultimate goal of any curative treatment should be to repair the hemorheological abnormalities caused by SCD, and thus normalize blood flow and prevent clinical complications. Our mini-review highlights a set of key hemorheological biomarkers (and the current and emerging technologies used to measure them) that may be used to guide the development of novel curative and palliative therapies for SCD, and functionally assess outcomes. Impact statement Severe impairment of blood rheology is the hallmark of SCD pathophysiology, and one of the key factors predisposing SCD patients to pain crises, organ damage, and early mortality. As novel therapies emerge to treat or cure SCD, it is crucial that these treatments are functionally evaluated for their effect on blood rheology. This review describes a comprehensive panel of rheological biomarkers, their clinical uses, and the technologies used to obtain them. The described technologies can produce highly sensitive measurements of the ability of current treatments to improve blood rheology of SCD patients. The goal of curative therapies should be to achieve blood rheology biomarkers measurements in the range of sickle cell trait individuals (HbAS). The use of the panel of rheological biomarkers proposed in this review could significantly accelerate the development, optimization, and clinical translation of novel therapies for SCD.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4697-4697
Author(s):  
Michel Gowhari ◽  
Taimur Abbasi ◽  
Roberto F Machado ◽  
Victor R. Gordeuk

Introduction The sole disease-modifying agent approved by the FDA for sickle cell disease (SCD) is hydroxyurea (HU), but it may be underutilized in the management of this condition. Not all patients respond to or can tolerate treatment with HU and it is not clear a priori who will respond. We evaluated the utilization of HU in a cross-sectional study of adults with SCD at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) to determine how often HU has been attempted in all individuals who fulfill the criteria for the use of this disease modifying agent. Methods HU status was noted at the time of blood draw for enrollment in the UIC registry of SCD. Those not on HU were assessed as to whether or not they met criteria for being on HU in particular three or more vaso-occlusive episodes requiring presentation to a health care facility during the preceding 12 months or a lifetime history of one or more episodes of acute chest syndrome. The subjects who met these criteria for HU treatment were then divided into two groups, those who had been treated with HU in the past and those who had never received treatment. Those previously treated with HU were further assessed as to whether or not treatment was discontinued due to an adverse drug reaction, development of a contraindication, non-response, refusal to continue treatment, or noncompliance with treatment and/or clinic visits. Those who had never been on HU were categorized into whether or not treatment was not provided because of a contraindication, patient refusal of treatment, or noncompliance with clinic visits. Results Of 290 subjects enrolled in the study, 171 (59%) were either on HU (N=124, 43%), did not meet criteria for HU (N=35, 12%), or were on a chronic transfusion program (N=12, 4%). The remaining 119 (41%) were not on HU although they met the criteria. Among these 119 subjects HU had been attempted in almost half (N=58) but 37 were no longer on HU because of an adverse drug reaction, development of a contraindication, or non-response and 18 were noncompliant or refused to continue treatment. For those subjects in whom HU had never been attempted (N=61), almost half (N=30) had refused treatment or had been noncompliant with clinic visits. It was not possible to establish a valid reason for non-treatment in only 25 of 119 subjects not receiving HU (4 subjects in the group in which HU had been attempted in the past and 21 in the group in which HU had never been prescribed). Conclusion A cross-sectional survey at our sickle cell center clarified the picture for utilization of HU in individuals with SCD at UIC. Among those fulfilling criteria for HU therapy, 75% were currently receiving the medication or had received it in the past. A valid reason for non-treatment could be established in the majority of patients not receiving HU. However, 25 individuals (8% of all subjects included in the study) fulfilled criteria for treatment with HU but were not receiving the agent and the reason for non-treatment could not be established. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document