Natural rubber–polyurethane block copolymers: Nonlinear structural variations with NCO/OH ratio

2006 ◽  
Vol 46 (12) ◽  
pp. 1812-1821 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Gopakumar ◽  
M.R. Gopinathan Nair
2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. S. Mrudula ◽  
Nidhi Tiwari ◽  
Shambhu Nath Jha ◽  
Dibyendu Bhattacharyya ◽  
M. R. Gopinathan Nair

1998 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 440-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Paul ◽  
M. R. Gopinathan Nair ◽  
N. R. Neelakantan ◽  
Peter Koshy

1991 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 325-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Ravindran ◽  
M. R. Gopinathan Nayar ◽  
D. Joseph Francis

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 785-797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catalina Natalia Cheaburu-Yilmaz ◽  
Sinem Yaprak Karavana ◽  
Onur Yilmaz

Background: Chitosan structure versatility toward a change in an external stimulus represents a “must have” for the pharmaceutical applications, especially for the pharmaceutical formulations. Chemical modification can open new ways to obtain materials with tailored properties. Despite the great interest for conventional graft modifications, controlled/living free radical polymerizations (i.e. RAFT, ATRP, etc.) and advanced chemistry techniques (i.e. click chemistry) seem more attractive nowadays and involve facile and fast procedure, high regioselectivity, quantitative yield, mild reaction conditions without generation of by-products. Objective: The present review provides a detailed state of art of the chemical modification of chitosan i.e. tailored side-chain functionalization using RAFT polymerization and click chemistry for specific applications within pharmaceutical formulations taking into account the applicative aspect regarding the need of pharmaceuticals. Conclusion: The review showed the routes of current approaches for side chain modification of chitosan including graft, block copolymers or other structural variations. The esterification of RAFT agents on chitosan by using carbonyl activating reagents enables producing chitosan graft and block copolymers with controlled architectures while the development of protection/ deprotection chemistry of chitosan made possible the regioselective modification of chitosan or other polysaccharides. Although these developments increased the potential of chitosan, still the chemical functionality and architectural diversity of the derivatives are limited. Application of modern techniques e.g. RAFT polymerization, “click” chemistry has opened new “doors” for the science of controlled and chemoselective synthesis of well- tailored derivatives with unique and superior properties.


1960 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 923-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Ceresa

Abstract Degradation of natural rubber during mastication has been shown to proceed via two alternative mechanisms, oxidative scission at high temperatures and mechanical scission at lower temperatures. The low temperature process, cold mastication, has received the greater attention. The energy supplied to the extended rubber chains during mechanical deformation is sufficient to cause homolytic scission into polymeric free radicals. The degradation of high polymers by a rupture process via mechanical scission has been shown to occur during the cold mastication of synthetic elastomers and during the mechanical working of high molecular weight vinyl and acrylic polymers in the visco-elastic state. The application of shearing forces to certain polymers in the brittle glass state has provided evidence for both homolytic scission into polymeric free radicals and heterolytic scission into polymeric ions. Polymeric radicals, produced by mechanical chain scission, have been used as initiators of vinyl polymerization to give block copolymers of an essentially linear character. Thus the block copolymerizations of methyl methacrylate, styrene, vinyl acetate, acrylonitrile, and ethyl acrylate have been initiated by mechanically shearing natural rubber, polymethyl methacrylate, polystyrene, polyvinyl acetate, polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride and polyvinyl formal during the process of extrusion of the polymer plasticized to a viscoelastic state with the monomer. Many other polymer-monomer systems have yielded block copolymers by cold mastication. Cold mastication of elastomer blends, such as natural rubber and neoprene, also leads to block copolymer formation by both combinative and hydrogen abstractive processes between the different species of elastomer radicals present. If two polymers are completely compatible so that one continuous phase is present in the blend, and if the polymeric constituents have a common viscoelastic temperature range, then mechanical working during extrusion or internal mixing can lead to block copolymer formation. If the tendency of the polymeric radicals formed by mechanical rupture is to recombine rather than to disproportionate, then the chances of block copolymer formation are increased. The presence of sites for hydrogen or halogen abstraction upon one of the polymer constituents is also an aid to grafted block copolymer formation. Thus polyvinyl chloride-neoprene blends give grafted block copolymers on extrusion or internal mixing and polyethylene-polyvinyl acetate blends block copolymerize when masticated in the absence of oxygen. Block copolymerization is largely controlled by the viscoelastic properties of the systems chosen.


2004 ◽  
Vol 289 (10) ◽  
pp. 927-932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Maier ◽  
Vendula Knopfova ◽  
Brigitte Voit ◽  
Pham Huu Ly ◽  
Bui Tien Dung ◽  
...  

Polymer ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 39 (26) ◽  
pp. 6861-6874 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.J. Paul ◽  
M.R. Gopinathan Nair ◽  
N.R. Neelakantan ◽  
Peter Koshy ◽  
Bhaskar B. Idage ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 955-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Chandrasekharan Nair ◽  
S. Gopakumar ◽  
M. R. Gopinathan Nair

2011 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 1151-1159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitinart Saetung ◽  
Irène Campistron ◽  
Sagrario Pascual ◽  
Jean-Claude Soutif ◽  
Jean-François Pilard ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document