The validity of the national adult reading test in estimating premorbid intellectual ability in long-term survivors of hemispheric glioma and whole brain irradiation—a pilot study

1993 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus P. Ebmeier ◽  
Kerry Booker ◽  
Ann Cull ◽  
Ann Gregor ◽  
Guy M. Goodwin ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol In Press (In Press) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anya jafari ◽  
Zahra Siavashpour ◽  
Mohammad Houshyari

Context: Increased survival of patients with cancer raises the need to pay attention to long-term side effects. Patients with brain metastasis experienced cognition failure after whole-brain radiotherapy. This review aimed at concluding the efficacy of Memantine in preserving cognitive function by reducing the brain toxicity of whole-brain radiotherapy for metastatic brain cancers. Evidence Acquisition: Published studies evaluating memantine protective effects during brain metastasis radiotherapy were searched for in scientific databases (e.g., Embase, PubMed, Cochrane database, Google Scholar, Scopus) using keywords including whole-brain radiotherapy and Memantine. Results: A total of 4 prospective clinical trials were included in the review. Effects of Memantine on cognition tests were evaluated in these trials. A significantly better Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) delayed recognition at months 6 was achieved in RTOG 0614 and NRG CC001. Longer time to cognitive decline was found in the memantine arm of the RTOG trial and was statistically significant. Memantine effects were not statistically significant before 2 months. Conclusions: It seems reasonable to consider Memantine during radiation to prevent long-term cognitive failure in patients with brain metastasis due to the current results. Memantine improves cognition function during whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) without adding irreparable complications.


GeroScience ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Institoris ◽  
Ciaran Murphy-Royal ◽  
Stefano Tarantini ◽  
Andriy Yabluchanskiy ◽  
Jordan N. Haidey ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 454-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinya Jinguji ◽  
Junichi Yoshimura ◽  
Kenichi Nishiyama ◽  
Hiroshi Aoki ◽  
Keisuke Nagasaki ◽  
...  

Object Radiation monotherapy—prophylactic craniospinal or whole-brain irradiation paired with a radiation boost to the primary tumor—is the standard treatment for intracranial germinomas at the authors' institution. The authors assessed long-term outcomes of patients with germinoma who underwent therapy and identified factors affecting them. Methods The authors retrospectively analyzed data obtained in 46 patients (35 males and 11 females, age 5–43 years at diagnosis) who had been treated for intracranial germinomas between 1990 and 2009 at the authors' institution. Thirty patients had germinomas in localized regions and 16 in multiple regions. Thirty-eight patients (83%) underwent radiotherapy alone (craniospinal irradiation in 32 and whole-brain irradiation in 6). Seven patients underwent radiochemotherapy and 1 underwent chemotherapy alone. The mean radiation doses for the whole brain, spine, and primary tumor site were 26.9, 26.6, and 49.8 Gy, respectively. The median follow-up period was 125 months. Results The 10-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates were 93.3% and 89.3%, respectively. None of the 38 patients who received radiation monotherapy developed a recurrent lesion, whereas 1 of 7 who underwent radiochemotherapy and the 1 patient who underwent chemotherapy had a recurrent lesion. Of the entire population, 26 patients required hormone replacement therapy, 2 had short stature, and 1 developed a radiation-induced meningioma. Seventeen of the 25 childhood- or adolescent-onset patients were 19 years or older at the latest follow-up visit, 15 of whom graduated from senior high school, and only 2 of whom graduated from college. Of 34 patients who were 19 years or older at the latest visit, 4 were students, 18 worked independently, 4 worked in sheltered workplaces, and 8 were unemployed. Of the 34 patients, 4 got married after the initial treatment, 3 of whom had children. There were 8 patients (17%) with low postoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores that were significantly associated with impaired neurocognitive functions, severe surgical complications, and neurological impairments. In 10 of the 46 patients, KPS scores at the latest visit were lower than their postoperative KPS scores. These decreases in KPS scores were significantly correlated with a delayed decline in neurocognitive functions in childhood-onset patients and a postoperative impairment of neurocognitive functions in patients with adolescent- or adult-onset germinoma. Conclusions No tumor recurrence occurred in germinoma patients treated with the authors' radiation monotherapy, which appears to be effective enough to cure the tumor. Brain damage caused by tumors themselves and surgical complications were found to adversely affect functional outcomes in patients regardless of their age. Although radiotherapy rarely caused late adverse effects in patients with adolescent- or adult-onset, in some childhood-onset lesions, the radiation seems to carry the risk of neurocognitive dysfunctions, which are attributable to late adverse effects. Accordingly, treatments for germinoma patients should be selected according to a patient's age and the extent of the tumor and with particular care to avoid surgical complications.


2001 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 451-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. CRAWFORD ◽  
I. J. DEARY ◽  
J. STARR ◽  
L. J. WHALLEY

Background. The National Adult Reading Test (NART) is widely used in research and clinical practice as an estimate of pre-morbid or prior ability. However, most of the evidence on the NART's validity as a measure of prior intellectual ability is based on concurrent administration of the NART and an IQ measure.Method. We followed up 179 individuals who had taken an IQ test (the Moray House Test) at age 11 and administered the NART and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at age 77. A subset (N=97) were also re-administered the original IQ test.Results. The correlation between NART performance at age 77 and IQ age 11 was high and statistically significant (r=0·73; P<0·001). This correlation was comparable to the correlation between NART and current IQ, and childhood IQ and current IQ, despite the shared influences on the latter variable pairings. The NART had a significant correlation with the MMSE but this correlation fell to near zero (r=0·02) after partialling out the influence of childhood IQ.Discussion. The pattern of results provides strong support for the claim that the NART primarily indexes prior (rather than current) intellectual ability.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document