Evaluation of ethanedinitrile (EDN) as a preplant soil fumigant in Florida strawberry production

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 1134-1141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jialin Yu ◽  
Juliana S Baggio ◽  
Nathan S Boyd ◽  
Josh H Freeman ◽  
Natalia A Peres
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 569-570 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaolong Qin ◽  
Yuxiao Cheng ◽  
Mingxing Sun ◽  
Lili Yan ◽  
Guoqing Shen


2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. vzj2012.0130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Spurlock ◽  
Jirka Šimůnek ◽  
Bruce Johnson ◽  
Atac Tuli


2006 ◽  
pp. 197-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.W. Mattner ◽  
R.K. Gounder ◽  
R.C. Mann ◽  
I.J. Porter ◽  
J.N. Matthiessen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  


1988 ◽  
Vol 3 (11) ◽  
pp. 299-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Rick ◽  
Leslle P. McCarty


HortScience ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 1673-1676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen R. King ◽  
Angela R. Davis ◽  
Wenge Liu ◽  
Amnon Levi

The primary purpose of grafting vegetables worldwide has been to provide resistance to soilborne diseases. The potential loss of methyl bromide as a soil fumigant combined with pathogen resistance to commonly used pesticides will make resistance to soilborne pathogens even more important in the future. The major disease problems addressed by grafting include fusarium wilt, bacterial wilt, verticillium wilt, monosporascus root rot, and nematodes. Grafting has also been shown in some instances to increase tolerance to foliar fungal diseases, viruses, and insects. If the area devoted to grafting increases in the future, there will likely be a shift in the soil microbial environment that could lead to the development of new diseases or changes in the pathogen population of current diseases. This shift in pathogen populations could lead to the development of new diseases or the re-emergence of previously controlled diseases. Although grafting has been demonstrated to control many common diseases, the ultimate success will likely depend on how well we monitor for changes in pathogen populations and other unexpected consequences.



2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dvera I. Saxton

In this article, I describe how the methods of anthropology proved productive and fruitful for research and environmental justice (EJ) activism against methyl iodide, a highly toxic soil fumigant pesticide used to sterilize soil before food crops like strawberries are transplanted. I continue a thread of discussion around what roles anthropology, and especially, public and applied anthropology, should play in addressing the serious problems traditionally encountered, documented, analyzed, and theorized through ethnographic research. Anthropological engagement and action on methyl iodide and other soil fumigants produced unique research opportunities and networks up and down the agricultural hierarchy, as well as spaces to contribute ethnographic labor and critical analysis and reflection to the EJ movement. While this activist approach— what I refer to as 'ethnographic movement methods'—presented some challenges, the victorious end-result of having methyl iodide's manufacturer pull their product from the U.S. market in 2012 also demonstrated how anthropologists, in cooperation with communities confronted by environmental suffering, can work cooperatively towards alternative agricultural and ecological futures.Keywords: activism; applied anthropology; environmental justice; farmworkers; ethnographic movement methods; pesticides



2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 801-806
Author(s):  
Kshitij Khatri ◽  
Nathan S. Boyd

AbstractMetam potassium (metam-K) is a soil fumigant used commonly in Florida at the end of the tomato and pepper production season. The fumigant essentially cleans a field by killing the established weeds and crops after harvest. The goal of this project was to determine the optimal rate of metam-K for the effective termination of tomato, pepper, and established weeds such as purple nutsedge, goosegrass, and dogfennel. Tomato, pepper, and purple nutsedge at bed center were effectively terminated with the metam-K rate of 65 kg ha−1. Optimal rates required for the termination of goosegrass and dogfennel were 91 and 156 kg ha−1, respectively. In contrast, metam-K at 500 to 680 kg ha−1 was required to terminate purple nutsedge on bed edges. The reduced efficacy of metam-K at bed edge might be related to the limited movement of metam-K in soil.



2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (9) ◽  
pp. 2146-2155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zongjie Ren ◽  
Yuan Li ◽  
Wensheng Fang ◽  
Dongdong Yan ◽  
Bin Huang ◽  
...  


1971 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 677-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.H. Hutson ◽  
J.A. Moss ◽  
B.A. Pickering
Keyword(s):  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document