Screening and Treatment of Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, and Syphilis in Correctional Settings

2021 ◽  
pp. 195-205
Author(s):  
Erin Tromble ◽  
Laura Bachmann
1993 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Inciardi ◽  
Dorothy Lockwood ◽  
Judith A. Quintan

Although there seems to be a consensus that “drugs are in every prison,” and that “prison drug use is widespread,” little is really known about the prevalence and patterns of drug use in prison. What appears in the academic and research literature is at best anecdotal, suggesting only that drug use and trafficking exist in correctional settings, and that the control of drugs by inmates is in part related to prison violence. Similarly, press reports descriptive of drug use in prison typically focus on trafficking networks and the complicity of prison personnel, rather than on prevalence and patterns of use. Within this context, this article addresses the nature of drug use in prison, based on systematic interviewing and drug testing in the Delaware correctional system. Some conclusions and implications are offered relative to the impact of prison drug use on corrections-based therapeutic initiatives.


2020 ◽  
pp. 073401682098162
Author(s):  
Sonia L. Canzater ◽  
Regina M. LaBelle

The disproportional rates of opioid use disorder (OUD) in U.S. correctional facilities make them prime intervention points to treat OUD utilizing medication to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD), the evidence-based clinical standard of care. MOUD has been shown to be effective to support recovery and reduce recurrence of OUD, overdose deaths, and recidivism for justice-involved persons both while incarcerated and once they reenter their communities. Despite the high prevalence, most jails and prisons do not offer MOUD. Litigation has spurred expanded access in more facilities, but widespread MOUD access can only become a reality through a comprehensive effort of corrections officials, medical experts, advocates, legislators, and other champions to raise awareness and affect ideological and policy change. It is a legal and ethical imperative that the lives of justice-involved persons not be jeopardized by the lack of evidence-based treatment for OUD in correctional settings.


Incarceration ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 263266632110217
Author(s):  
Laura McKendy ◽  
Rose Ricciardelli ◽  
Kate Konyk

Prisons and other correctional settings are spaces often marked by numerous sources of physical, psychological, and emotional insecurity. Researchers have consistently found correctional work to be associated with outcomes such as burnout, posttraumatic stress disorder, and depression. Drawing on open-ended survey questions with correctional workers (CWs) in the province of Ontario, we first identify salient themes in discussions of work stressors and potentially psychologically traumatic events (PPTEs); these include situations involving harm to prisoners, harm to staff, and harms associated with occupational and organizational culture. Next, employing the concept of “habitus,” we consider the social-subjective effects of exposure to PPTEs as revealed in respondent accounts. Key aspects include a disposition of hypervigilance, desensitization, disillusionment, and distrust. We suggest that the CW habitus may, in some ways, serve to mitigate threats in the work environment, though may have negative effects on job performance and well-being, and come to shape social experiences in everyday life.


2014 ◽  
Vol 104 (6) ◽  
pp. e69-e74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Larney ◽  
Madeline K. Mahowald ◽  
Nicholas Scharff ◽  
Timothy P. Flanigan ◽  
Curt G. Beckwith ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Kent Martin ◽  
Jeffrey E. Hostetter ◽  
John J. Hagan

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (2A) ◽  
pp. 71-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine S. Elkington ◽  
Jessica Jaiswal ◽  
Anya Y. Spector ◽  
Heidi Reukauf ◽  
James M. Tesoriero ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document