Survey of Literature on Cost-Benefit Analysis for Industrial Project Evaluation

1972 ◽  
pp. 23-69
Author(s):  
Arnold C. Harberger
Author(s):  
Robin Boadway

This is an overview of the methods used to evaluate projects or policies when a normative approach is taken based on individual preferences. The evaluation of individual welfare change is first outlined and related to the concepts of willingness-to-pay and willingness-to-accept. The use of individual welfare measures in project evaluation is outlined. This is followed by approaches to aggregating individual welfare changes. The case for ignoring equity considerations based on the compensation criterion is critically discussed. The use of a social welfare function for cost-benefit analysis is presented, and it application to project evaluation outlined. Several extensions are considered, including the evaluation of non-marketed commodities, the treatment of uncertainty, and multi-period project evaluation. Throughout, the conceptual difficulties of measuring and aggregating welfare change are emphasized.


1979 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-189
Author(s):  
A. R. Kemal

While the book under review provides a critical evaluation of cost-benefit analysis, it mainly focuses on the relevance and utility of project evaluation techniques for development planning. It has been argued in the book that no project can be meaningfully evaluated in isolation because its impact not only is confined to the project itself but tends to spill over to other projects as well. Such spill-over effects become all the more critical when the induced economic effects of that project are not marginal. In addition to the interdependence between projects, the author has drawn attention to an oft-neglected but very important aspect of cost-benefit analysis: Shadow prices are not very meaningful in the context of project evaluation exercise in the real world if they are computed without considering the structure of the economy, the pace of development and income distribution.


1970 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 500-503
Author(s):  
Stanislaw Wellisz

The Little-Mirrlees Manual of Industrial Project Analysis in- Developing Countries is divided into two parts; the first of which is addressed "to the senior administrator or politician, who should understand the broad lines of what is implied by operating a system of social cost-benefit analysis"; and the second "to those who will actually make project evaluations, and teach others how to make them". In fact, the two parts make an integral whole, since the first part of the book raises several broad issues the answers to which are given in the second part. For instance, on page 44 the "senior administrator or politician" is told of the dilemma of the choice between employment-generating and rein¬ vestment-generating projects; a project which employs a lot of labour will get higher marks because it results in a lot of consumption by the poor now. But the incomes generated by such a project will be almost entirely spent. There will, therefore, be little savings generated and so such a project will contribute little to further investment, which, in turn, yields future consumption", while a capital-intensive project with a high reinvestment rate makes a greater contribution to the future, but a smaller one to present welfare. Unless the "senior administrator or politician" is willing to read difficult and often obscure discussions in Partll (Ch. 13) he will have no idea how to go about resolving the dilemma. There is little fear, however, that the nonprofessional reader will get through Part I, not to speak of Part II. To be sure, the authors give a warning that "some of the chapters of Part I may be a little academic for the senior man who has become familiar with economics by practical exposure and does not want to feel that he is going back to school", but they grossly underestimate the gap between the layman's ability to cope with abstract concepts and their "own ability to use plain English. I wonder what the intelligent layman is to make of the following passage which occurs on page 41 and which I chose almost at random:


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document