Free Labor vs Slave Labor: The British and Caribbean Cases (1999)

1999 ◽  
pp. 399-443
Author(s):  
Seymour Drescher
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin N. Narváez

Abolition forced planters in the post-Civil War US South to consider new sources and forms of labor. Some looked to Spanish America for answers. Cuba had long played a prominent role in the American imagination because of its proximity, geostrategic location, and potential as a slave state prior to the Civil War. Even as the United States embraced abolition and Cuba maintained slavery, the island presented Southern planters with potential labor solutions. Cuban elites had been using male Chinese indentured workers (“coolies” or colonos asiáticos) to supplement slave labor and delay the rise of free labor since 1847. Planters in coastal Peru similarly embraced Chinese indentured labor in 1849 as abolition neared. Before the Civil War, Southerners generally had noted these developments with anxiety, fearing that coolies were morally corrupt and detrimental to slavery. However, for many, these concerns receded once legal slavery ended. Planters wanted cheap exploitable labor, which coolies appeared to offer. Thus, during Reconstruction, Southern elites, especially in Louisiana, attempted to use Chinese indentured workers to minimize changes in labor relations.


Author(s):  
Jason Phillips

This chapter explains speculations that a civil war would be sparked by a sectional conflict between rival classes and economies. Radicals in both regions imagined an unavoidable battle between free labor and slavery. It shows how new technology and burgeoning capitalism affected American approaches to the future. The telegraph promoted faith in the reach and permanence of human actions. The railroad encouraged a go-ahead culture of enterprising visionaries who won the race of life by progressing ahead of ordinary men and fashioning the future. These changes increased the tempo of life, heightened fears of economic panics and political conspiracies, and emboldened speculators who hoped to capitalize on a showdown between free and slave labor.


2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 530-543
Author(s):  
George Weickhardt
Keyword(s):  

AbstractMuscovite law, which was advanced and well-articulated in many areas, developed no coherent theory of contracts. Even the Law Code of 1649 contains few provisions on contracts and virtually none on the sale of goods or free (non-serf, non-slave) labor. The Muscovite tsardom did, however, adopt some simple provisions that served to reduce the possibility of disputes about whether there was a contract and what its terms were, such as requiring all important contracts to be in writing. Muscovite law also made it clear that consent to a contract had to be freely given, without duress or fraud. The article attempts to explain the lack of any law regulating the sale of goods and free labor.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-94
Author(s):  
Scott Alan Carson

The body mass index (BMI) reflects current net nutrition and health during economic development. This study introduces a difference-in-decompositions approach to show that although 19th century African American current net nutrition was comparable to working-class Whites, it was made worse-off with the transition to free-labor. BMI reflects net nutrition over the life-course, and like stature, slave children’s BMIs increased more than Whites as they approached entry into the adult slave labor force. Agricultural worker’s net nutrition was better than workers in other occupations but was worse-off under free-labor and industrialization. Within-group BMI variation was greater than across-group variation, and White within-group variation associated with socioeconomic status was greater than African Americans.


2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison Page

This article analyzes the website slaveryfootprint.org, which purports to measure consumers’ reliance on slave labor in the Global South by analyzing the users’ consumption habits. The site offers neoliberal consumer solutions to “solve” the problem of what it terms modern-day slavery. I argue that the characterization of slavery on slaveryfootprint.org (and the process of de-fetishizing this labor) attempts to shore up a distinction between “free” and forced labor, but unwittingly illuminates the ambiguity of this divide. By understanding slavery as embedded in capitalism, I suggest that we can challenge slaveryfootprint.org’s distinction between “free” labor and slavery, and in the process, the notion of “ethical” consumption.


2013 ◽  
pp. 291-314
Author(s):  
Stanley L. Engerman ◽  
Robert A. Margo
Keyword(s):  

1996 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Hanes

In the eighteenth-century British Empire and the antebellum South, slaves were concentrated in domestic service and rural enterprises like agriculture and ironworks. I argue that employers in these sectors chose to employ slaves rather than free labor because they faced especially high turnover costs—that is, costs of searching for a worker and going without labor when a free worker quit or was fired. In the absence of slavery, these sectors were marked by other institutions designed to deal with turnover costs: indentured servitude, employment agencies, and deferred compensation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document