An Application of Empirical Argumentation Analysis to Spinoza's Ethics

2007 ◽  
pp. 2166-2173
Keyword(s):  
Argumentation Analysis

scholarly journals Understanding conflicting views of endocrine disruptor experts: a pilot study using argumentation analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sander C.S. Clahsen ◽  
Holly S. van Klaveren ◽  
Theo G. Vermeire ◽  
Irene van Kamp ◽  
Bart Garssen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Endocrine Disruptor ◽  
Argumentation Analysis

Argumentation Analysis of Risk Assessments: The Case of Perfluorooctanoic Acid

Risk Analysis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.P. Jongeneel ◽  
H. Klaveren ◽  
R.P. Bogers ◽  
J. Dévilee ◽  
K.R. Rijs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Perfluorooctanoic Acid ◽  
Risk Assessments ◽  
Argumentation Analysis

SageBook: Toward a cross-generational social network for the Jewish sages’ prosopography

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 676-695
Author(s):  
Maayan Zhitomirsky-Geffet ◽  
Gila Prebor
Keyword(s):  
Social Network ◽  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Rabbinic Literature ◽  
Jewish Law ◽  
Related Data ◽  
Jewish Thought ◽  
Argumentation Analysis

Abstract In this research we devised and implemented a semi-automatic approach for building a SageBook–a cross-generational social network of the Jewish sages from the Rabbinic literature. The proposed methodology is based on a shallow argumentation analysis leading to detection of lexical–syntactic patterns which represent different relationships between the sages in the text. The method was successfully applied and evaluated on the corpus of the Mishna, the first written work of the Rabbinic Literature which provides the foundation to the Jewish law development. The constructed prosopographical database and the network generated from its data enable a large-scale quantitative analysis of the sages and their related data, and therefore might contribute to the research of the Talmudic literature and evolution of the Jewish thought throughout the two last millennia.

scholarly journals The Study of Literary Criticism on The Well of Loneliness from the Perspective of Toulmin’s Argumentation Model

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Min Liu
Keyword(s):  
Literary Criticism ◽  
Dynamic Process ◽  
Literary Work ◽  
Argumentative Discourse ◽  
Important Method ◽  
Argumentation Analysis ◽  
New Perspective ◽  
Pragmatic Strategies ◽  
Toulmin’S Model ◽  
The Well Of Loneliness

Literary criticism is a kind of commentary genre, with a certain color of argumentation. Toulmin’s model, as an important method of non-formal logic, has played an important role in the analysis of argumentative discourse (Yang, 2004). Therefore, it also provides a new perspective for the study of literary criticism. This paper, on the basis of consummating Toulmin’s model, analyzes different specific arguments of The Well of Loneliness, this controversial literary work whether can become a literary classic and widely recognized in different times, combined with literary criticism, and tries to characterize the internal structure of the argumentation, analysis of the dynamic process of argumentation and improvement of the pragmatic strategies of argumentation in a finer way. Thereby, it is more rational to verdict and to verify the rationality and effectiveness of the argumentation. Then suggestions of the construction and perfection of literary criticism can be provided.

A Review Corpus for Argumentation Analysis

2014 ◽  
pp. 115-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henning Wachsmuth ◽  
Martin Trenkmann ◽  
Benno Stein ◽  
Gregor Engels ◽  
Tsvetomira Palakarska
Keyword(s):  
Argumentation Analysis

scholarly journals Modersmålsämnets legitimitet i ett förändrat politiskt landskap - En analys av svensk riksdagsdebatt under 2010-talet

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 31-50
Author(s):  
Christina Hedman ◽  
Jenny Rosén
Keyword(s):  
Political Action ◽  
Mother Tongue ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
Political Agenda ◽  
Political Landscape ◽  
School Subjects ◽  
Parliamentary Debate ◽  
Mother Tongue Instruction ◽  
Argumentation Analysis

The legitimacy of the mother tongue subject in a changing political landscape: An analysis of Swedish parliamentary debate in the twenty-tens. This paper highlights and discusses the arguments in favor of, or against Mother Tongue Instruction (MTI) in Swedish parliamentary debate between 2010 and 2020. New to this decade is the entrance of yet another nationalist and populist party with the abolishment of MTI on its political agenda. Building on a critical discourse analytical frame and argumentation analysis, we discuss this party’s rhetoric on MTI – based in an Othering discourse and the construction of MTI as a path to alienation – and the parliamentary counter-voices. The latter mainly concern the role of MTI for development of Swedish and learning in other school subjects, implying that MTI in its own right is subordinated. We argue that this counter-discourse represents a shift in how MTI is legitimized – and in fact plays into assimilationists’ hands – compared to the pluralistic ideology that initially made way for MTI. The importance of scrutinizing political rhetoric is stressed to anticipate political action.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document