Optimal Control and Monitoring of Deteriorating Production Processes

1997 ◽  
pp. 301-316
Author(s):  
J. Yang ◽  
V. Makis
Author(s):  
S.N. Masaev ◽  

The enterprise is presented as a digital twin of interrelated production processes, support processes and administrative processes. A semantic indicator for a general assessment of the state of the system at different points in time is given. The semantic indicator is applied to assess the optimal control by Kalman filter. The obtained estimates of optimal control make it possible to take into account the resources consumed by the processes in the past periods. The obtained optimal control can be used with other control methods through control and observation matrices. Estimates of the optimal ratio of values are obtained: the amount of the resource in the system, the method of attracting the resource, the execution time of the method, the computational complexity of the method.


2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 423-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Giglio ◽  
Riccardo Minciardi ◽  
Simona Sacone ◽  
Silvia Siri

2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (7) ◽  
pp. 204-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianyou Chai

This paper describes the control and operational management process of plant-wide production processes and analyzes the relationship between the control system actions and the multiple global production indices that characterize quality, yield, costs, and consumptions etc. The existing research results in control and optimization are reviewed. From the angles of mathematical models-based, data-based and their combinations, the state-of-art of control and optimization is summarized. This is followed by the analysis on the challenging issues on the optimal control for plant-wide production processes in terms of process control, operational optimization and the realization of the control systems.


1992 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan G. Kamhi

My response to Fey’s article (1985; reprinted 1992, this issue) focuses on the confusion caused by the application of simplistic phonological definitions and models to the assessment and treatment of children with speech delays. In addition to having no explanatory adequacy, such definitions/models lead either to assessment and treatment procedures that are similarly focused or to procedures that have no clear logical ties to the models with which they supposedly are linked. Narrowly focused models and definitions also usually include no mention of speech production processes. Bemoaning this state of affairs, I attempt to show why it is important for clinicians to embrace broad-based models of phonological disorders that have some explanatory value. Such models are consistent with assessment procedures that are comprehensive in nature and treatment procedures that focus on linguistic, as well as motoric, aspects of speech.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy S. Francis ◽  
Pilar Regalado ◽  
Silvia P. Saenz ◽  
Gabriela Duran

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document