When foreign companies supply equipment for production of class A500 and B500 cold rebars to the Russian market, the manufacturer as a rule estimate its production indices by generally accepted parameters: machine utilization index (MUI), drawing speed and bars diameter (sometimes with specific differentiation). Usually, MUI and drawing speed are presented as the highest reached parameters without accounting particular conditions of operation at a customer, and sometimes – without configuration of the equipment. With a high price of equipment, a customer often gets low efficiency coefficient of correspondence between the high production parameters announced by the manufacturer and those being realized in practice. It was shown that drawing lines for production rebars of the class mentioned above, are typical by equipment content, for example unreeling and power segments. The difference can be only in coiling equipment segment. Such an equipment refers to equipment of cycling products discharge, which is done only at a coil change (a full coil for an empty one). Accumulation of tonnage is provided by a number of coils, which as a result (of a shift, day, month and a year) makes a production program of such drawing lines. If the change of coils at any coiler configuration (automatic, semi-automatic or manual) requires halt of the drawing line, then such halts must be accounted in the time balance of line operation and down times. Accounting of them can considerably change the announced production indices. Per se the production program of such drawing lines should be made taking into consideration actual MUI, but not the advertising one. Results of monitoring of contractual data of some foreign companies presented, to evaluate actuality of the announced by them indices of the equipment production program, supplied at the Russian market. The calculations of down times accounting change time and coils tonnage, as a relative index of drawing lines productivity and their analysis showed that the advertising data presented in the analyzed contracts, cannot be considered as representing and reference ones for making commercial production program of a customer. A method of calculation proposed and recommendations presented, which any customer can use when making inquiry for purchasing drawing equipment from any manufacturer. Also, the method can be used for internal monitoring of in-house production under conditions of particular state of engineer infrastructure and level of automation and mechanization of basic technological operations.