Approach to Foreign Body Ingestion, Food Impaction, and Caustic Injury

2016 ◽  
pp. 91-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel C. Gorospe ◽  
Louis M. Wong Kee Song ◽  
Prasad G. Iyer
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 974-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diogo Libânio ◽  
Mónica Garrido ◽  
Filipa Jácome ◽  
Mário Dinis-Ribeiro ◽  
Isabel Pedroto ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ergun Ergun ◽  
Ufuk Ates ◽  
Gulnur Gollu ◽  
Kutay Bahadir ◽  
Aydin Yagmurlu ◽  
...  

Summary The aim of this study is to review the experience on managing foreign body ingestion in children with special emphasis on the endoscopic techniques and specific retrieval devices used for foreign body (FB) extraction. The charts of 341 children were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic data, ingested material, removal technique and tool, level of FB, complications, and outcomes were recorded. A total of 364 FBs were removed from 341 children. Among these, 56.5% (n: 206) were entrapped in esophagus, 39% (n: 142) were in stomach, and 4.5% (n: 16) in duodenum and intestine. The most frequently ingested items were coin (42.5%), button batteries (20.6%), and safety pins (12%). Optical forceps (37.9%) were the most commonly used tool and they were used during retrieval of esophageal FB by rigid endoscopy. Retrieval net (20.7%) was the second most common tool and the most common one during flexible endoscopy. Depending on our experience, we strongly advocate rigid endoscopy for esophageal FBs and food impaction in children because it allows both to use optical forceps with a strong grasping ability for blunt FBs and to position sharp and pointed objects inside the rigid endoscope. We recommend retrieval net as the first tool for the extraction of blunt objects and rat tooth retrieval forceps is the best tool for sharp and pointed FBs in stomach.


2008 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-195
Author(s):  
Y. Oka ◽  
K. Asabe ◽  
H. Kai ◽  
T. Shirakusa

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 028-032
Author(s):  
Nisar Ahmad Shah ◽  
Showkat Ahmad Kadla ◽  
Asif Iqbal Shah ◽  
Bilal Ahmad Khan ◽  
Inaam Ul Haq ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background and Aims: Foreign-body ingestion is a common phenomenon, especially in children. In normal adults, foreign-body ingestion is usually accidental and mostly ingestion occurs with food and impaction is a result of structural abnormalities of the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGIT). However, accidental ingestion of nonfood products is unusual; especially ingestion of pins (scarf or safety pins) and needles is unknown. We come across ingestion of these unusual/sharp foreign bodies routinely from the past few years. The aim of this study was to observe, over a period of 1 year, the spectrum of nonfood or true foreign-body ingestion in our community and to see the impact of an early endoscopy on outcome or retrieval of the ingested objects. Materials and Methods: In a prospective observational study, we studied the profile of foreign-body ingestion in normal individuals of all ages and both sexes, excluding the individuals with any structural abnormalities of the gut and the people with psychiatric ailment. Results: Of total 51 patients with foreign-body ingestion, 42 (82%) were 20 or <20 years of age with females constituting 86.3% of the total and males constituting only 13.7%. Foreign bodies ingested included 38 pins (74.5%), seven coins (13.7%), four needles (7.8%), and one denture and a nail (2%) each. Overall 26 (51%) foreign bodies were seen in UGIT (within reach of retrieval) at the time of endoscopy and all of them were retrieved. Nineteen (37.3%) patients reported within 6 h of ingestion, and majority of them (16 = 84.2%) had foreign bodies within UGIT and all of them were removed. Those patients (n = 32; 62.7%) who reported beyond 6 h, only 10 (31.25%) had foreign bodies in UGIT as a result of which the success rate of removal in these patients was only 32%. Conclusion: Most of our patients were young females and the common foreign bodies ingested were sharp including scarf pins followed by coins and needles. The success rate of retrieval was high in those who reported within 6 h of ingestion of foreign body. The rate of retrieval was 100% if foreign body was found on esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Hence, we recommend an early endoscopy in these patients and some alternative to use of scarf pins.


2017 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. AB211
Author(s):  
Simone L. Moreira ◽  
Carla L. Aluizio ◽  
Danielle P. Sampaio ◽  
Cristiane k. Nagasako ◽  
Maria de Fatima C. Servidoni ◽  
...  

Foreign body ingestion is a regular medical referral. Patients present with different objects such as chicken bones, nails, coins, and fishbones. It is usually managed in causality and passes without any intervention. However, occasionally, we come across fishbone complications requiring intervention. We discuss the course and management of two case reports of fishbone injuries in different abdominal regions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document