Herbicide Resistance Screening Assay

Author(s):  
Joan M. Peterson
2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Veloria ◽  
Ashwini K. Devkota ◽  
Eun Jeong Cho ◽  
Kevin N. Dalby

Apyrase is a calcium-activated enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to adenosine diphosphate (ADP), adenosine monophosphate (AMP), and Pi. It is currently used in studies involving cancer and platelet aggregation in humans, as well as herbicide resistance in plants. Inhibitors of apyrase are being investigated for their use to suppress tumors and combat herbicide resistance. Only a few inhibitors of apyrase have been reported, many of which were identified through automated screening using a 96-well plate format and colorimetric phosphate detection. However, these screens have had limitations, including large volumes, inconsistent reproducibility, high incidence of false hits, and lack of higher-throughput compatibility. A luciferin/luciferase-based detection system has been reported to examine potential inhibitors of apyrase; however, these reactions were performed in tubes with the assay completion in seconds, which necessitate the development of a high-throughput screening (HTS)–compatible format for screening. Therefore, a more cost-effective biochemical assay that improved the limitations of the previous assay formats using a commercially available luminescence-based detection system was developed. This new robust mix-and-read platform incorporates a low-volume luminescence-based protocol, formatted for use in 384-well microplates. This new format provides a simple and cost-effective method to screen for apyrase inhibitors and will facilitate larger HTS efforts to identify potent inhibitors of apyrase.


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A596-A596
Author(s):  
M LEERDAM ◽  
F HUDIG ◽  
W ROOIJEN ◽  
E SLAATS ◽  
A GERAEDTS ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-92
Author(s):  
Rob Edwards

Herbicide resistance in problem weeds is now a major threat to global food production, being particularly widespread in wild grasses affecting cereal crops. In the UK, black-grass (Alopecurus myosuroides) holds the title of number one agronomic problem in winter wheat, with the loss of production associated with herbicide resistance now estimated to cost the farming sector at least £0.5 billion p.a. Black-grass presents us with many of the characteristic traits of a problem weed; being highly competitive, genetically diverse and obligately out-crossing, with a growth habit that matches winter wheat. With the UK’s limited arable crop rotations and the reliance on the repeated use of a very limited range of selective herbicides we have been continuously performing a classic Darwinian selection for resistance traits in weeds that possess great genetic diversity and plasticity in their growth habits. The result has been inevitable; the steady rise of herbicide resistance across the UK, which now affects over 2.1 million hectares of some of our best arable land. Once the resistance genie is out of the bottle, it has proven difficult to prevent its establishment and spread. With the selective herbicide option being no longer effective, the options are to revert to cultural control; changing rotations and cover crops, manual rogueing of weeds, deep ploughing and chemical mulching with total herbicides such as glyphosate. While new precision weeding technologies are being developed, their cost and scalability in arable farming remains unproven. As an agricultural scientist who has spent a working lifetime researching selective weed control, we seem to be giving up on a technology that has been a foundation stone of the green revolution. For me it begs the question, are we really unable to use modern chemical and biological technology to counter resistance? I would argue the answer to that question is most patently no; solutions are around the corner if we choose to develop them.


HortScience ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 506b-506
Author(s):  
Carol D. Robacker ◽  
S.K. Braman

Azalea lace bug (Stephanitis pyrioides) is the most serious pest on azalea. Results of laboratory bioassays and field evaluations of 17 deciduous azalea taxa have identified three resistant taxa: R. canescens, R. periclymenoides, and R. prunifolium. Highly susceptible taxa are `Buttercup', `My Mary', R. oblongifolium, and the evergreen cultivar `Delaware Valley White'. To determine whether in vitro techniques would have potential value in screening or selecting for resistance, or for the identification of morphological or chemical factors related to resistance, an in-vitro screening assay was developed. In-vitro shoot proliferation was obtained using the medium and procedures of Economou and Read (1984). Shoots used in the bioassays were grown in culture tubes. Two assays were developed: one for nymphs and one for adult lace bugs. To assay for resistance to nymphs, `Delaware Valley White' leaves containing lace bug eggs were disinfested with 70% alcohol and 20% commercial bleach, and incubated in sterile petri plates with moistened filter paper until the nymphs hatched. Five nymphs were placed in each culture tube, and cultures were incubated for about 2 weeks, or until adults were observed. To assay for resistance to adults, five female lace bugs were placed in each culture tube and allowed to feed for 5 days. Data collected on survival and leaf damage was generally supportive of laboratory bioassays and field results. Adult lace bugs had a low rate of survival on resistant taxa. Survival of nymphs was somewhat reduced on resistant taxa.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document