Basic Bone Biology Healing During Osseointegration of Titanium Dental Implants

Author(s):  
David Soto-Peñaloza ◽  
José Javier Martín-de-Llano ◽  
Carmen Carda-Batalla ◽  
Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago ◽  
David Peñarrocha-Oltra
1999 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guaracilei Maciel Vidigal ◽  
Liane Cassol Argenta Aragones ◽  
Aguinaldo Campos ◽  
Mario Groisman

2005 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 776-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motohiro Uo ◽  
Kiyotaka Asakura ◽  
Atsuro Yokoyama ◽  
Kazuchika Tamura ◽  
Yasunori Totsuka ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 61-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.H. Prado da Silva ◽  
G.A. Soares ◽  
C.N. Elias ◽  
J.H.C. Lima ◽  
H. Schechtman ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 205 (5) ◽  
pp. 1636-1641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heng-Li Huang ◽  
Yin-Yu Chang ◽  
Meng-Cheng Lai ◽  
Cai-Rong Lin ◽  
Chih-Ho Lai ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sutton Wheelis ◽  
Arvind Adapalli ◽  
Pilar Valderramma ◽  
Thomas Wilson ◽  
Danieli Rodrigues

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Alexandre Gehrke ◽  
Raphaél Bettach ◽  
Jaime Sardá Aramburú Júnior ◽  
Juan Carlos Prados-Frutos ◽  
Massimo Del Fabbro ◽  
...  

Objectives. The present study aims to compare the drilling protocol effect on osseointegration event in three commercially available titanium dental implants with different drill protocol using a rabbit tibia model. Materials and Methods. Three different drilling sequences were compared as follows: drilling sequence using a single unique drill of 4.2 mm conical implant (Group 1), drilling sequence using 3 consecutive cylindrical drills for a 4.1 mm cylindrical implant (Group 2), and drilling sequence using 3 consecutive conical drills for a 4.3 mm conical implant (Group 3). For each group, 18 drilling procedures and implant placements were performed, totalizing 54 commercially available titanium dental implants. The samples were removed 6 weeks after implantation. Resonance frequency analyses (RFA) were performed immediately after the implantation, and at 6 weeks removal torque test (RTt) and histological analysis were performed. Results. The RFA measured showed statistical difference between the groups in time 1 and no significant statistical differences in time 2 (p>0.05). In the RTt no significant difference was found between the 3 groups tested. Histomorphometric analysis showed no significant difference between groups in the bone-to-implant contact% (p>0.05). Conclusion. In the present preclinical study, osteotomy using a single bur did not show differences regarding the proposed and evaluated tests parameters for assessing the peri-implant behavior.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document