Author(s):  
Mahalingam Ramkumar

Approaches for securing digital assets of information systems can be classified as active approaches based on attack models, and passive approaches based on system-models. Passive approaches are inherently superior to active ones. However, taking full advantage of passive approaches calls for a rigorous standard for a low-complexity-high-integrity execution environment for security protocols. We sketch broad outlines of mirror network (MN) modules, as a candidate for such a standard. Their utility in assuring real-world information systems is illustrated with examples.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ye-Chao Liu ◽  
Xiao-Dong Yu ◽  
Jiangwei Shang ◽  
Huangjun Zhu ◽  
Xiangdong Zhang

Author(s):  
Michael Blondin ◽  
Javier Esparza ◽  
Stefan Jaax ◽  
Philipp J. Meyer

AbstractPopulation protocols are a well established model of computation by anonymous, identical finite-state agents. A protocol is well-specified if from every initial configuration, all fair executions of the protocol reach a common consensus. The central verification question for population protocols is the well-specification problem: deciding if a given protocol is well-specified. Esparza et al. have recently shown that this problem is decidable, but with very high complexity: it is at least as hard as the Petri net reachability problem, which is -hard, and for which only algorithms of non-primitive recursive complexity are currently known. In this paper we introduce the class $${ WS}^3$$ WS 3 of well-specified strongly-silent protocols and we prove that it is suitable for automatic verification. More precisely, we show that $${ WS}^3$$ WS 3 has the same computational power as general well-specified protocols, and captures standard protocols from the literature. Moreover, we show that the membership and correctness problems for $${ WS}^3$$ WS 3 reduce to solving boolean combinations of linear constraints over $${\mathbb {N}}$$ N . This allowed us to develop the first software able to automatically prove correctness for all of the infinitely many possible inputs.


Author(s):  
Segundo Moises Toapanta Toapanta ◽  
Luis Enrique Mafla Gallegos ◽  
Alex Enrique Aranda Alvarado ◽  
Maximo Prado Solis

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (OOPSLA) ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Dominik Winterer ◽  
Chengyu Zhang ◽  
Zhendong Su
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document