Integrating the German and US Perspective on Organizational Practices for Later Life Work: The Later Life Work Index

Author(s):  
Max R. Wilckens ◽  
Anne M. Wöhrmann ◽  
Caitlin Adams ◽  
Jürgen Deller ◽  
Ruth Finkelstein
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S763-S764
Author(s):  
Max R Wilckens ◽  
Anne M Wöhrmann ◽  
Jürgen Deller ◽  
Mo Wang

Abstract Most developed countries face an ageing workforce. Extended working lives require organizations to employ older individuals successfully. It is, however, widely untapped, which organizational practices drive successful employment of an older and age-diverse workforce, because adequate measure are missing. We hence develop the Later Life Work Index (LLWI) as a multi-faceted measure for researchers and practitioners, combining the detailed level of assessment relevant in practice with thorough conceptual coverage. We build on an empirically derived taxonomy of organizational practices developed by Wöhrmann et al. (2018). Proposed taxonomy is based on qualitative expert interviews and consists of nine dimensions covering age-inclusive organizational climate and leadership, as well as practices regarding work design, health management, individual development, knowledge management, transition to retirement, continued employment options, and health and retirement coverage. Within a first study, we developed an inventory to operationalize the intentionally broad LLWI construct. Items were iteratively developed and pretested with 30-42 German human resource managers. The final inventory consists of 100 Likert scaled, sufficiently reliable items. Within a second study among 600 managers and older workers in Germany, we confirmed the factor structure proposed by the LLWI, and ensured construct validity regarding similar scales (convergent validity) and individual level health and motivation outcomes (criterion validity). Discriminant validity is shown among the index dimensions, and regarding positive and negative affect. This paper enhances the understanding and quantitative assessment of organizational practices for later life work. We further plan to reduce the number of items to increase practicability of the measure.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 832-833
Author(s):  
Julia Finsel ◽  
Anne Wöhrmann ◽  
Mo Wang ◽  
Max Wilckens ◽  
Jürgen Deller

Abstract Due to aging workforces, research on organizational practices for older employees becomes more important for individuals and organizations. However, existing measures for such organizational practices tend to capture the construct with unidimensional scales, use single-item operationalizations, or focus on a specific area. Hence, Wöhrmann, Deller, and Pundt (2018) developed the Later Life Workplace Index (LLWI) to provide a multidimensional framework to measure organizational practices for older employees on nine dimensions, namely organizational climate, leadership, work design, health management, individual development, knowledge management, transition to retirement, continued employment after retirement, and health and retirement coverage. The LLWI has recently been operationalized and validated in Germany (Wilckens, Wöhrmann, Deller, & Wang, 2020). However, to utilize the index beyond German-speaking countries, a validated English version is required. Thus, we aimed to validate an English version of the LLWI using a sample of older U.S. employees (N = 279). Results support the domain level factor structure of the LLWI but show some redundancy among the 80 items for the overall nine domain factor structure. A comparison between the U.S. sample and a German sample (N = 349) confirmed configural and (partial) metric measurement invariance of the English version. Results further supported convergent, discriminant, criterion, as well as incremental validity. Researchers can utilize the new measure to gain a deeper understanding of organizational practices relevant for older employees, while practitioners are able to assess their organizational readiness for an aging workforce. We envision further translation and validation in other languages and cultural contexts.


2020 ◽  
Vol 149 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-133
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Counter

Oscar Wilde and Émile Zola are conventionally opposed as the figureheads of, respectively, the aestheticist and the naturalist literary trends. Yet they exhibit a number of uncanny similarities—not least the turn both made in their last years toward religious themes and imagery, and especially those of martyrdom and the Passion. This article explores such images in the later life, work, and public persona of each writer and sets them within the context of the dizzying proliferation of references to Christ and martyrdom in fin de siècle culture. It examines the “entailments”—the unexpected consequences, meanings, and echoes—that these overdetermined themes brought in their train from the wider literary field and shows how those entailments were exacerbated by the massive politicization of “martyr” discourse around the time of the Dreyfus affair, when the theme acquired its fullest significance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document