Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy

2019 ◽  
pp. 29-31
Author(s):  
Justin T. Huntington ◽  
Karen A. Diefenbach
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy

Computed Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (CT-PEG) in Patients with Challenging Percutaneous Access

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Laporte ◽  
Stephen Phillips ◽  
Jay Shah ◽  
R. Ermentrout ◽  
Kei Yamada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Percutaneous Access ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy

scholarly journals Low Serum Albumin Level is Risk Factor for Patients with Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy

2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (21) ◽  
pp. 2283-2288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoyuki Tominaga ◽  
Ryo Shimoda ◽  
Ryuichi Iwakiri ◽  
Nanae Tsuruoka ◽  
Yasuhisa Sakata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Serum Albumin ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Serum Albumin Level ◽  
Albumin Level ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Low Serum

scholarly journals Prevention and management of major complications in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000628
Author(s):  
Kurt Boeykens ◽  
Ivo Duysburgh
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Early Recognition ◽  
Endoscopic Technique ◽  
Abdominal Wound ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Major Complications ◽  
Life Threatening

BackgroundPercutaneousendoscopic gastrostomy is a commonly used endoscopic technique where a tube isplaced through the abdominal wall mainly to administer fluids, drugs and/orenteral nutrition. Several placement techniques are described in the literaturewith the ‘pull’ technique (Ponsky-Gardener) as the most popular one.Independent of the method used, placement includes a ‘blind’ perforation of thestomach through a small acute surgical abdominal wound. It is a generally safetechnique with only few major complications. Nevertheless these complicationscan be sometimes life-threatening or generate serious morbidity.MethodAnarrative review of the literature of major complications in percutaneousendoscopic gastrostomy.ResultsThis review was written from a clinical viewpoint focussing on prevention andmanagement of major complications and documentedscientific evidence with real cases from more than 20 years of clinical practice.ConclusionsMajorcomplications are rare but prevention, early recognition and popper management areimportant.

scholarly journals Attitude and experience of neurologists towards percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: an Egyptian study

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherien Farag ◽  
Shady S. Georgy ◽  
Mai Fathy ◽  
Ahmed elSadek ◽  
Khaled O. Abdulghani
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Neurological Diseases ◽  
Public Awareness ◽  
Cerebrovascular Disorders ◽  
Common Symptom ◽  
Nasogastric Feeding ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Intervention Failure ◽  
Self Administered Questionnaire ◽  
Nasogastric Tube Insertion

Abstract Background Dysphagia is a common symptom among various neurological diseases. Guidelines recommend gastrostomy insertion for prolonged dysphagia with lower rate of intervention failure encountered with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) as compared to nasogastric tube insertion. Methods Neurology consultants only were included and completed a self-administered questionnaire concerning their practice backgrounds and previous experience with PEG feeding during their practice. Results Ninety-eight percent stated that they would recommend PEG for patients with prolonged need of nasogastric feeding. However, only 88% actually referred patients to perform PEG, with the cerebrovascular disorders being the most common cases to be referred. The main barriers the surveyed neurologists faced were family resistance and financial reasons (53.5%). Interestingly, younger neurologists practicing for less than 15 years referred patient to perform PEG significantly more frequent than older ones (p = 0.01). About 18% of our sample confirmed the lack of sufficient knowledge about the benefits of PEG feeding, and only 22% previously attended scientific sessions about the benefits and indications of PEG. Conclusion Based on our study, we recommend that PEG should be more encouraged in indicated neurological cases. Scientific sessions targeting neurologists and public awareness about the benefits of PEG and its relatively infrequent complications are highly demanded.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document