Image-Based Scene Representations for Head-Motion Parallax in 360° Panoramas

Author(s):  
Tobias Bertel ◽  
Feng Xu ◽  
Christian Richardt
Keyword(s):  
Perception ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 1301-1312 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Predebon ◽  
Jacob Steven Woolley

The familiar-size cue to perceived depth was investigated in five experiments. The stimuli were stationary familiar objects viewed monocularly under otherwise completely darkened visual conditions. Perceived depth was measured directly with the method of verbal report and indirectly with the head-motion procedure. Although the familiar-size cue influenced verbal reports of the distances of the objects, it did not determine perceived depth as assessed with the head-motion procedure. These findings support the claim that familiar size is not a major determinant of perceived depth, and that cognitive or nonperceptual factors mediate the effects of familiar size on direct reports of depth and distance. Possible reasons for the failure of familiar size to influence the head-motion-derived measures of perceived depth are discussed with particular emphasis on the role of motion parallax in determining perceptions of depth and relative distance.


1998 ◽  
Vol 201 (9) ◽  
pp. 1483-1491 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Pabst ◽  
K Kral

The behavioural experiments described here examined, in the praying mantis Tenodera sinensis, the manner in which the proprioceptive cervical hair plate sensilla are involved in the measurement of the distance to a jump target with the aid of motion parallax actively produced by translatory head motion. Various combinations of surgical deafferentation of the cervical hair plate sensilla had no influence on the linearisation of head motion. However, the measurement of relative and absolute distance and the jump frequency were impaired by these interventions. From the results, it is concluded that the cervical hair plate sensilla are involved in the distance measurement mechanism, probably by allowing the nervous system to compare retinal image motion with head motion. <P>


Perception ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 625-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret A Hagen ◽  
Harry B Elliott ◽  
Rebecca K Jones

To investigate the role of flat surface information for the plane of projection in pictorial perception, three studies were designed in which varying amounts of such information were made available to adult subjects. The first study tested preferences for true or modified linear perspective under conditions of presence or absence of surface texture cues for the plane of projection. In the second and third studies, the absence of texture cues for the plane was coupled with the addition of motion parallax and binocular information respectively. It was found that adults showed a consistent preference for parallel perspective in pictures when the flat-surface information was provided either by visible texture or by motion parallax; but no consistent preference for either true or modified perspective in the absence of all three sources of flatness information or when the flat surface information was given only by binocular cues in the absence of visible surface texture or head motion.


2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 638-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanfeng Yuan ◽  
W. L. Sachtler ◽  
Nat Durlach ◽  
Barbara Shinn-Cunningham

Experiments were conducted to determine how the ability to detect and discriminate head-motion parallax depth cues is degraded by time delays between head movement and image update. The stimuli consisted of random-dot patterns that were programmed to appear as one cycle of a sinusoi dal grating when the subject's head moved. The results show that time delay between head movement and image update has essentially no effect on the ability to discrimi nate between two such gratings with different depth char acteristics when the delay is less than or equal to roughly 265 ms.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (7) ◽  
pp. 700-700
Author(s):  
A. M. Plooy ◽  
J. P. Wann

Author(s):  
Stephen R. Ellis ◽  
Brian M. Menges ◽  
Richard H. Jacoby ◽  
Bernard D. Adelstein ◽  
Jeffrey W. McCandless

Human subjects localized a monocularly viewed, space-stabilized virtual object presented on a head-mounted, see-through display. They either kept their head stationary or rocked it laterally to produce motion parallax. Their distance estimates had less variability in a head moving condition than in a head stationary condition, but in general were much less precise and much less accurate than comparable stereo-based localizations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document