Pixel Grouping Based Image Hashing for DIBR 3D Image

2021 ◽  
pp. 356-369
Author(s):  
Chen Cui ◽  
Xujun Wu ◽  
Jun Yang ◽  
Juyan Li
Keyword(s):  
Image Hashing ◽  
3D Image ◽  
Pixel Grouping

scholarly journals A Novel DIBR 3D Image Hashing Scheme Based on Pixel Grouping and NMF

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Chen Cui ◽  
Xujun Wu ◽  
Jun Yang ◽  
Juyan Li
Keyword(s):  
Classification Accuracy ◽  
Nonnegative Matrix ◽  
Geometric Distortion ◽  
Depth Image ◽  
Image Hashing ◽  
3D Image ◽  
Virtual Image ◽  
Accuracy Rate ◽  
Image Identification ◽  
Pixel Grouping

Most of the traditional 2D image hashing schemes do not take into account the change of viewpoint when constructing the final hash vector. This result in the classification accuracy rate is unsatisfactory when applied for depth-image-based rendering (DBIR) 3D image identification. In this work, pixel grouping based on histogram shape and nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) are applied to design DIBR 3D image hashing with better robustness resisting to geometric distortions and higher classification accuracy rate for virtual image identification. Experiments show that the proposed hashing is robust against common signal and geometric distortion attacks, such as additive noise, blurring, JPEG compression, scaling, and rotation. Compared with the state-of-art schemes of traditional 2D image hashing, the proposed hashing achieves better performances under above attacks, especially for virtual image identification.

Interacting in 3D Space: Comparison of a 3D Two-handed Interface to a Keyboard-and-mouse Interface for Medical 3D Image Manipulation

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Jacob Seagull ◽  
Peter Miller ◽  
Ivan George ◽  
Paul Mlyniec ◽  
Adrian Park
Keyword(s):  
Image Manipulation ◽  
3D Image ◽  
3D Space

Ultralow Dose CT Imaging for Navigated Skull Base Surgery Using ASIR and MBIR-2D and 3D Image Quality

2014 ◽  
Vol 75 (S 02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerlig Widmann ◽  
P. Schullian ◽  
R. Hoermann ◽  
E. Gassner ◽  
H. Riechelmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Skull Base ◽  
Skull Base Surgery ◽  
Ct Imaging ◽  
3D Image ◽  
Ultralow Dose ◽  
2D And 3D

BLIND FEATURE SELECTION AND EXTRACTION IN A 3D IMAGE CUBE

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ahmad ◽  
Syungyoung Lee ◽  
Ihsan Ul Haq ◽  
Qaisar Mushtaq
Keyword(s):  
Feature Selection ◽  
3D Image ◽  
Image Cube

Full-parallax 3D display using time-multiplexing projection technology

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-1-100-6
Author(s):  
Takuya Omura ◽  
Hayato Watanabe ◽  
Naoto Okaichi ◽  
Hisayuki Sasaki ◽  
Masahiro Kawakita
Keyword(s):  
Incident Light ◽  
Polarization State ◽  
3D Image ◽  
3D Display ◽  
Time Division Multiplexing ◽  
3D Images ◽  
Polarization Gratings ◽  
Light Rays ◽  
Time Division

We enhanced the resolution characteristics of a threedimensional (3D) image using time-division multiplexing methods in a full-parallax multi-view 3D display. A time-division light-ray shifting (TDLS) method is proposed that uses two polarization gratings (PGs). As PG changes the diffraction direction of light rays according to the polarization state of the incident light, this method can shift light rays approximately 7 mm in a diagonal direction by switching the polarization state of incident light and adjusting the distance between the PGs. We verified the effect on the characteristics of 3D images based on the extent of the shift. As a result, the resolution of a 3D image with depth is improved by shifting half a pitch of a multi-view image using the TDLS method, and the resolution of the image displayed near the screen is improved by shifting half a pixel of each viewpoint image with a wobbling method. These methods can easily enhance 3D characteristics with a small number of projectors.

Noninvasive patient tracker mask for spinal 3D navigation: does the required large-volume 3D scan involve a considerably increased radiation exposure?

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 838-844
Author(s):  
Jan-Helge Klingler ◽  
Ulrich Hubbe ◽  
Christoph Scholz ◽  
Florian Volz ◽  
Marc Hohenhaus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Image Data ◽  
3D Image ◽  
Flat Panel ◽  
3D Navigation ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Dose Area Product ◽  
Flat Panel Detector ◽  
3D Scan ◽  
Area Product

OBJECTIVEIntraoperative 3D imaging and navigation is increasingly used for minimally invasive spine surgery. A novel, noninvasive patient tracker that is adhered as a mask on the skin for 3D navigation necessitates a larger intraoperative 3D image set for appropriate referencing. This enlarged 3D image data set can be acquired by a state-of-the-art 3D C-arm device that is equipped with a large flat-panel detector. However, the presumably associated higher radiation exposure to the patient has essentially not yet been investigated and is therefore the objective of this study.METHODSPatients were retrospectively included if a thoracolumbar 3D scan was performed intraoperatively between 2016 and 2019 using a 3D C-arm with a large 30 × 30–cm flat-panel detector (3D scan volume 4096 cm3) or a 3D C-arm with a smaller 20 × 20–cm flat-panel detector (3D scan volume 2097 cm3), and the dose area product was available for the 3D scan. Additionally, the fluoroscopy time and the number of fluoroscopic images per 3D scan, as well as the BMI of the patients, were recorded.RESULTSThe authors compared 62 intraoperative thoracolumbar 3D scans using the 3D C-arm with a large flat-panel detector and 12 3D scans using the 3D C-arm with a small flat-panel detector. Overall, the 3D C-arm with a large flat-panel detector required more fluoroscopic images per scan (mean 389.0 ± 8.4 vs 117.0 ± 4.6, p < 0.0001), leading to a significantly higher dose area product (mean 1028.6 ± 767.9 vs 457.1 ± 118.9 cGy × cm2, p = 0.0044).CONCLUSIONSThe novel, noninvasive patient tracker mask facilitates intraoperative 3D navigation while eliminating the need for an additional skin incision with detachment of the autochthonous muscles. However, the use of this patient tracker mask requires a larger intraoperative 3D image data set for accurate registration, resulting in a 2.25 times higher radiation exposure to the patient. The use of the patient tracker mask should thus be based on an individual decision, especially taking into considering the radiation exposure and extent of instrumentation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document