Vocabulary Size as a Predictor of Willingness to Communicate Inside the Classroom

Author(s):  
Meltem Şen ◽  
Huseyin Oz
2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Burani ◽  
S. Primativo ◽  
L. S. Arduino ◽  
S. O'Brien ◽  
D. Paizi ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jillian McLellan ◽  
Casey A. Carroll ◽  
Brooke Soden Hensler ◽  
Peg Hull Smith ◽  
Wendelyn Shore
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-194
Author(s):  
Marta Kajzer-Wietrzny ◽  
Ilmari Ivaska

Empirical Translation Studies have recently extended the scope of research to other forms of constrained and mediated communication, including bilingual communication, editing, and intralingual translation. Despite the diversity of factors accounted for so far, this new strand of research is yet to take the leap into intermodal comparisons. In this paper we look at Lexical Diversity (LD), which under different guises, has been studied both within Translation Studies (TS) and Second Language Acquisition (SLA). LD refers to the rate of word repetition, and vocabulary size and depth, and previous research indicates that translated and non-native language tends to be less lexically diverse. There is, however, no study that would investigate both varieties within a unified methodological framework. The study reported here looks at LD in spoken and written modes of constrained and non-constrained language. In a two-step analysis involving Exploratory Factor Analysis and linear mixed-effects regression models we find interpretations to be least lexically diverse and written non-constrained texts to be most diverse. Speeches delivered impromptu are less diverse than those read out loud and the non-constrained texts are more sensitive to such delivery-related differences than the constrained ones.


Author(s):  
Peter D. MacIntyre ◽  
Tammy Gregersen

Abstract The idiodynamic method is a relatively new mixed-method approach to studying in real time the complex dynamics of integrated affective and cognitive states that interact continuously with human communication. The method requires video recording a sample of communication from a research participant and then using specialized software to play the video back while collecting contemporaneous self-reported ratings (approximately one per second) on one or more focal variables of interest to the researcher, such as willingness to communicate (WTC) or communication anxiety (CA). After the participant rates the communication sample, a continuous graph of changes in the focal variable is printed. The final step is to interview the speaker to gather an explanation for changes in the ratings, for example at peaks or valleys in the graph. The method can also collect observer ratings that can then be compared with the speaker’s self-ratings. To date, studies have been conducted examining WTC, CA, motivation, perceived competence, teacher self-efficacy, teacher empathy, and strategy use, among other topics. The strengths and limitations of the method will be discussed and a specific example of its use in measuring WTC and CA will be provided.


System ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
pp. 102521
Author(s):  
Mostafa Janebi Enayat ◽  
Ali Derakhshan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document