Towards a Hybrid Process Modeling Language

2021 ◽  
pp. 630-636
Author(s):  
Nicolai Schützenmeier ◽  
Stefan Jablonski ◽  
Stefan Schönig
Keyword(s):  
Process Modeling ◽  
Hybrid Process ◽  
Modeling Language

BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN BUSINESS MODELS AND WORKFLOW SPECIFICATIONS

2004 ◽  
Vol 13 (03) ◽  
pp. 289-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
JULIANE DEHNERT ◽  
WIL M. P. VAN DER AALST
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Business Process ◽  
Process Modeling ◽  
Business Models ◽  
Formal Semantics ◽  
Business Process Modeling ◽  
Modeling Language ◽  
Correctness Criterion ◽  
Process Chains ◽  
Selection Of

This paper presents a methodology to bridge the gap between business process modeling and workflow specification. While the first is concerned with intuitive descriptions that are mainly used for communication, the second is concerned with configuring a process-aware information system, thus requiring a more rigorous language less suitable for communication. Unlike existing approaches the gap is not bridged by providing formal semantics for an informal language. Instead it is assumed that the desired behavior is just a subset of the full behavior obtained using a liberal interpretation of the informal business process modeling language. Using a new correctness criterion (relaxed soundness), it is verified whether a selection of suitable behavior is possible. The methodology consists of five steps and is illustrated using event-driven process chains as a business process modeling language and Petri nets as the workflow specification language.

CoPModL: Construction Process Modeling Language and Satisfiability Checking

2019 ◽  
pp. 101457
Author(s):  
Elisa Marengo ◽  
Werner Nutt ◽  
Matthias Perktold
Keyword(s):  
Process Modeling ◽  
Modeling Language ◽  
Construction Process ◽  
Satisfiability Checking

scholarly journals The Syntax of a Multi-Level Production Process Modeling Language

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marko Vještica ◽  
Vladimir Dimitrieski ◽  
Milan Pisarić ◽  
Slavica Kordić ◽  
Sonja Ristić ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Production Process ◽  
Process Modeling ◽  
Modeling Language ◽  
Multi Level ◽  
Level Production

Hybrid Process Modeling of an Industrial Process

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corina Nentwich ◽  
Philip Gebus ◽  
Alexander Brächer ◽  
Ana Markovic
Keyword(s):  
Process Modeling ◽  
Industrial Process ◽  
Hybrid Process

Assessing Enterprise Modeling Languages Using a Generic Quality Framework

2011 ◽  
pp. 63-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Krogstie ◽  
Sofie de Flon Arnesen
Keyword(s):  
Process Modeling ◽  
General Framework ◽  
Enterprise Modeling ◽  
Modeling Language ◽  
Modeling Languages ◽  
Process Support ◽  
Language Quality ◽  
Quality Framework ◽  
Generic Quality

Statoil, one of Norway’s largest organizations, recently wanted to standardize an enterprise modeling language for process modeling for sense-making and communication. To perform the evaluation, a generic framework for assessing the quality of models and modeling languages was specialized to the needs of the company. Five different modeling languages were evaluated according to the specialized criteria. Two languages were, through this, found as candidate languages, and further criteria related to tool and process support for using the languages in actual modeling were used to decide the language to choose for future standardization. This work illustrates the practical utility of the overall framework, where language quality features are looked upon as means to enable the creation of models of high quality. It also illustrates the need for specializing this kind of general framework based on the requirements of the specific organization.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document