Urgency Analysis of Learners’ Comments: An Automated Intervention Priority Model for MOOC

2021 ◽  
pp. 148-160
Author(s):  
Laila Alrajhi ◽  
Ahmed Alamri ◽  
Filipe Dwan Pereira ◽  
Alexandra I. Cristea
Keyword(s):  
Priority Model

scholarly journals Fuzzy logic controller based priority model for VANET scheduling

2020 ◽  
Vol 1706 ◽  
pp. 012054
Author(s):  
K V Anusuya ◽  
M Sakthi Priya
Keyword(s):  
Fuzzy Logic ◽  
Fuzzy Logic Controller ◽  
Priority Model

A Risk and Priority Model for Cost-Benefit Analysis and Work Scheduling within Predictive Maintenance Scenarios

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffale Chianese ◽  
Luca Cicala ◽  
Cesario Vincenzo Angelino ◽  
Francesco Gargiulo ◽  
Davide Matarazzo
Keyword(s):  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Predictive Maintenance ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Priority Model ◽  
Work Scheduling

An Autonomous Residential Smart Distribution Board: A Panacea for Demand Side Energy Management for Non-Smart Grid Networks

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oladayo O. Olakanmi ◽  
Oluyemi Adetoyi ◽  
Oluwafemi Fajemisin
Keyword(s):  
Smart Grid ◽  
Energy Management ◽  
Demand Response ◽  
Dynamic Pricing ◽  
Performance Comparison ◽  
Usage Pattern ◽  
Energy Usage ◽  
Grid Networks ◽  
A Priority ◽  
Priority Model

Abstract Despite the benefits of demand response in energy management, the non-existence of its key concepts; dynamic pricing and smart grid, in some countries makes its impracticable in these countries, therefore making energy management unattainable for their consumers. This paper proposed a Smart Distribution Board (SDB) using a priority model for energy management in non-smart grid network. An historical consumption signatures of user’s loads were used to develop a priority model for load units of the SDB. Performance comparison was carried out between the SDB and a conventional Distribution Board which has no level of intelligence. Results obtained indicated that the SDB correctly emulated the energy usage pattern of users, thereby ensuring load preference is maximally satisfied autonomously within a limited budgeted energy and period.

Coordinated Transit Signal Priority Model Considering Stochastic Bus Arrival Time

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 1269-1277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Long Tien Truong ◽  
Graham Currie ◽  
Mark Wallace ◽  
Chris De Gruyter ◽  
Kun An
Keyword(s):  
Arrival Time ◽  
Transit Signal Priority ◽  
Priority Model

scholarly journals Performance Modeling of Proposed GUISET Middleware for Mobile Healthcare Services in E-Marketplaces

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaba Olu Akingbesote ◽  
Mathew Olusegun Adigun ◽  
Sibisuso Xulu ◽  
Edgar Jembere
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Waiting Time ◽  
Queuing Theory ◽  
Performance Modeling ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Pricing Strategy ◽  
Preemptive Priority ◽  
Mobile Healthcare ◽  
Utility Services ◽  
Priority Model

GUISET is a proposed middleware engine currently under study in South Africa. The goal is to provide utility services for small, medium, and macroenterprises in the context of mobile e-services. Three things are important to make this engine effective and efficient: the implementation, performance, and the pricing strategy. The literature has delved richly into implementation issue of similar projects. Both the performance and the pricing strategy issues have not been fully discussed especially in the context of mobile healthcare services. Some literature has addressed the performance issue using the exogenous nonpriority and the preemptive model. However, with providers offering different services using that approach may prove to be difficult to implement. This work extends existing and widely adopted theories to non-preemptive model by using the queuing theory and the simulation model in the context of mobile healthcare services. Our evaluation is based on non-preemptive priority and nonpriority discipline. Our results reveal that the unconditional average waiting time remains the same with reduction in waiting time over the non-preemptive priority model in four out of the five classes observed. This is envisaged to be beneficial in mobile healthcare services where events are prioritized and urgent attention is needed to be given to urgent events.

A single server tandem queue

1971 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sreekantan S. Nair
Keyword(s):  
Waiting Time ◽  
Queue Length ◽  
Busy Period ◽  
Single Server ◽  
Queueing Model ◽  
Tandem Queue ◽  
Limiting Behavior ◽  
Virtual Waiting Time ◽  
Priority Model

Avi-Itzhak, Maxwell and Miller (1965) studied a queueing model with a single server serving two service units with alternating priority. Their model explored the possibility of having the alternating priority model treated in this paper with a single server serving alternately between two service units in tandem.Here we study the distribution of busy period, virtual waiting time and queue length and their limiting behavior.

Non homogenous poisson process based cumulative priority model for determining optimal software testing period

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Praveen R Srivastava ◽  
Deepak Pareek ◽  
Kailash Sati ◽  
Dinesh C Pujari ◽  
G Raghurama
Keyword(s):  
Poisson Process ◽  
Software Testing ◽  
Testing Period ◽  
Priority Model

Stochastic Priority Model for Aggregate Blending

1985 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
pp. 358-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Said M. Easa ◽  
Emre K. Can
Keyword(s):  
Priority Model
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document