scholarly journals Data Unit, Translational Research, and Registries

2021 ◽  
pp. 157-165
Author(s):  
Fazal Hussain ◽  
Saud Alhayli ◽  
Mahmoud Aljurf

AbstractResearch is the only way to challenge the existing standards of care; a dynamic and multidimensional process encompassing innovative therapeutic modalities, techniques, and interventions to optimize outcomes and quality of life of cancer patients. Cancer research has emerged as one of the core competencies for the standardization, accreditation, and academic standing of any comprehensive cancer center. Data unit is the center of gravity and the hub of research and development (databases, registries, translational research, randomized control trials) in a quality cancer care facility. Quality assurance, ethical conduct, and monitoring of research are the hallmarks of a center of excellence in galvanizing the research efforts and optimizing the quality outcomes.

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Natividad ◽  
Todd Rowe

Abstract Central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters are fundamental in the delivery of pharmacologic and nutrition therapies to patient populations, including individuals with cancer. Malposition and migration of these catheters outside of the superior or inferior vena cava can contribute to delays in therapy as individuals await repositioning, and in some cases replacement of the catheter. Traditional repositioning using overwire or interventional radiology techniques can be costly and may delay care. The placement and management of these catheters has increasingly become the domain of specially trained vascular access nurses. A team of specially trained vascular access nurses, in collaboration with interventional radiologists at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center developed a procedure for catheter repositioning using a simultaneous rapid saline flush technique (SRSFT). We present this procedure, along with implications for cost and clinical outcomes. Clinical outcomes suggest that 68% of catheters have been successfully repositioned using this technique with no adverse events associated with the procedure noted to date. In addition, the use of the SRSFT represents a cost savings of up to 90% compared with traditional repositioning procedures. The SRSFT is identified as safe, timely, cost-conscious, and therapeutically effective, although further research is needed to formally evaluate the efficacy of repositioning using this technique compared with overwire and interventional-radiology-guided repositioning, including complications and quality outcomes.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6547-6547 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. P. Kane ◽  
K. Fessele ◽  
J. Gordilis-Perez ◽  
S. Schwartz ◽  
S. Lisi ◽  
...  

6547 Background: Although medication errors comprise 10–25% of all medical errors, little is known concerning the occurrence or types of medication errors occurring while treating patients on a clinical trial. Therefore, we retrospectively reviewed the medication errors reported in patients enrolled on clinical trials at our center. Methods: As part of a multidisciplinary continuous quality improvement project, from January 2003 through December 2006, we collected voluntary reports of medication errors in adult and pediatric patients on clinical trials involving both oral and intravenous chemotherapy. All reports were classified prospectively regarding clinical trial involvement, severity category (A to I) per the National Coordination Council on Medical Error Reporting and Prevention, type, cause, and where in the medication use process the error occurred. Results: There were 163 reports involving patients treated on clinical trials. The most common errors were those corrected prior to reaching the patient in 68% of events (Category A&B), while 31% reached the patient but did not result in harm (Category C&D), with 1% resulting in temporary patient harm (Category E&F). The most common type of errors were prescribing (66%), improper dose (42%), and omission errors (9%). Not following an institutional procedure or the protocol was the primary cause for these errors (39%), followed by the written order (30%), and poor communication involving both the healthcare team and the patient (26%). The processes where the errors initiated were in prescribing 47%, administration 10%, dispensing 6%, and monitoring 5%. Conclusion: Medication errors do occur in clinical trials, however the majority of these are corrected prior to reaching the patient or do not result in harm. Not following an institutional procedure or the protocol was the most common cause of error. This is most likely due to the protocol procedures differing from existing standards of care. Protocol-specific education through the Centralized Education and Training Service, a shared resource within our cancer center, addresses this issue enhancing the quality and safety of clinical trials through the education and training of healthcare professionals. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2020 ◽  
pp. 260-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hikmat Abdel-Razeq ◽  
Asem Mansour ◽  
Dima Jaddan

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in Jordan and the third leading cause of cancer death after lung and colorectal cancers. Although the incidence of breast cancer in Jordan is lower than that in industrialized nations, the number of new cases has been significantly increasing, and women present with breast cancer at a younger age and with more advanced disease than women in Western countries. Jordan is a medium-income country with limited resources and a young population structure. Therefore, breast cancer poses a particularly challenging burden on the country’s health care system. Despite ongoing endeavors to improve breast cancer care at both public and private levels, more work is needed to achieve downstaging of the disease and improve access, awareness, and participation in early detection. Multimodality treatment facilities and supportive care are available; however, the quality of care varies widely according to where the patient is treated, and most treatment facilities remain located centrally, thus, creating access difficulties. The King Hussein Cancer Center, the only comprehensive cancer center in Jordan, has changed the practice of oncology in the country via implementation of a multidisciplinary approach to treatment, monitoring of treatment outcomes, and investments in ongoing cancer research. However, there remains no national system for ensuring provision of high-quality cancer care nationwide. Here, we review the epidemiology of breast cancer and the current status of breast cancer care in Jordan, we compare our treatment outcomes with international ones, and we highlight challenges and improvement opportunities.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 296-296
Author(s):  
Jing Jing Wang Yakowec ◽  
Ingrid Stendhal ◽  
Hakim Lakhani ◽  
Joseph O. Jacobson

296 Background: Quantifying the performance of a cancer center’s cancer registry is important to plan for resources needed to address shortcomings and projected increases in workload. The objective of this project was to understand the workflow, reporting requirements, and existing documentation of the cancer registry at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) in order to build a dashboard that quantifies monthly performance. Methods: Current state workflow maps were created detailing the three phases of the cancer registry’s operations: case finding, case abstraction, and case follow-up. Individual meetings and a workshop with the cancer registry staff were held to validate workflows, gather operational challenges and improvement ideas, and set performance metrics. Leveraging information already being collected by staff as part of their workflow, a database was designed to collect and auto-visualize monthly performance using Excel and Tableau. Results: The performance dashboard shows monthly trends of ‘on target’ status of the cancer registry’s case finding, case abstraction, and case follow-up efforts. It also quantifies how delayed the cancer registry is in case finding or abstraction and provides new case count trends by care facility, staffing capacity based on case load, and trends in lost to follow-up patients. One hundred percent of the performance dashboard data is from documentation already generated by the cancer registry staff on a routine basis. Data on monthly case load from September 2017 through March 2018 are presented in the table below; given a maximum limit of 86 cases to abstract per abstractor per month, the cancer registry is currently at more than full capacity. Conclusions: A well-designed cancer registry performance dashboard that leverages existing data does not add burden to registry staff and informs how best to manage and utilize resources according to case load. [Table: see text]


Author(s):  
Fazal Hussain ◽  
Riad El Fakih ◽  
Mahmoud Aljurf

AbstractEffective data management is critical for quality research in any hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) center for accuracy, reliability, and validity of the data. HSCT research is a dynamic and multi-domain process encompassing innovative therapeutic modalities, techniques, and interventions to change the existing standard of care and optimize survival outcomes and patients’ quality of life. Research has evolved as one of the core competencies for the standardization, accreditation, and academic standing of the transplant center. The Data Unit is the center of gravity and the hub of research (databases, registries, translational research, and randomized control trials) in a quality cancer care facility. HSCT data collection, collation, and interpretation have become an integral part of the treatment rather than an option. Quality assurance (QA) and continuous quality improvement (CQI) in data management are pivotal for credibility, measurable/quantifiable outcomes, clinically significant impact, and setting benchmarks. Quality assurance, ethical conduct, and monitoring of HSCT data are the hallmarks of a center of excellence in galvanizing the therapeutic interventions and optimizing the outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (02) ◽  
pp. 75-76
Author(s):  
Ine Schmale

Das Armamentarium zur Behandlung des Nierenzellkarzinoms (RCC) hat sich um effektive Therapien erweitert, durch die der Therapiealgorithmus komplett umgestellt werden musste. Prof. Michael B. Atkins vom Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington DC/USA, und Prof. Daniel Y. C. Heng vom Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary/Kanada, teilten beim ASCO-GU ihre Einschätzung zur optimalen Behandlung des Nierenzellkarzinoms in der Erst- und Zweitlinientherapie für das Jahr 2019.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document