Body Contouring Surgery after Bariatric Surgery

Author(s):  
Mark Soldin ◽  
Charles Jack Bain ◽  
Maleeha Mughal
Author(s):  
Vasileios Vasilakis ◽  
Jeffrey L Lisiecki ◽  
Bill G Kortesis ◽  
Gaurav Bharti ◽  
Joseph P Hunstad

Abstract Background Abdominal body contouring procedures are associated with the highest rates of complications among all aesthetic procedures. Patient selection and optimization of surgical variables are crucial in reducing morbidity and complications. Objectives The purpose of this single-institution study was to assess complication rates, and to evaluate BMI, operative time, and history of bariatric surgery as individual risk factors in abdominal body contouring surgery. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who underwent abdominoplasty, circumferential lower body lift, fleur-de-lis panniculectomy (FDL), and circumferential FDL between August 2014 and February 2020. Endpoints were the incidence of venous thromboembolism, bleeding events, seroma, infection, wound complications, and reoperations. Univariate statistical analysis and multivariate logistic regressions were performed. Covariates in the multivariate logistic regression were BMI, procedure time, and history of bariatric surgery. Results A total of 632 patients were included in the study. Univariate analysis revealed that longer procedure time was associated with infection (P = 0.0008), seroma (P = 0.002), necrosis/dehiscence (P = 0.01), and reoperation (P = 0.002). These associations persisted following multivariate analyses. There was a trend toward history of bariatric surgery being associated with minor reoperation (P = 0.054). No significant increase in the incidence of major reoperation was found in association with overweight or obese patient habitus, history of bariatric surgery, or prolonged procedure time. BMI was not found to be an individual risk factor for morbidity in this patient population. Conclusions In abdominal body contouring surgery, surgery lasting longer than 6 hours is associated with higher incidence of seroma and infectious complications, as well as higher rates of minor reoperation. Level of Evidence: 4


Author(s):  
Rawan ElAbd ◽  
Osama A. Samargandi ◽  
Khalifa AlGhanim ◽  
Salma Alhamad ◽  
Sulaiman Almazeedi ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 133 (6) ◽  
pp. 776e-782e ◽  
Author(s):  
Arash Azin ◽  
Carrol Zhou ◽  
Timothy Jackson ◽  
Stephanie Cassin ◽  
Sanjeev Sockalingam ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. S50
Author(s):  
Kristine Steffen ◽  
James Mitchell ◽  
Anita Courcoulas ◽  
J. Peter Rubin ◽  
Jo Ellison ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. S40
Author(s):  
M. Greenfield ◽  
O. Smith ◽  
N. Hachach-Haram ◽  
N. Bystrzonowski ◽  
A. Pucci ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 924-930 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. E. E. de Vries ◽  
M. C. Kalff ◽  
E. M. van Praag ◽  
J. M. G. Florisson ◽  
M. J. P. F. Ritt ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction A considerable number of patients experience some long-term weight regain after bariatric surgery. Body contouring surgery (BCS) is thought to strengthen post-bariatric surgery patients in their weight control and maintenance of achieved improvements in comorbidities. Objectives To examine the impact of BCS on long-term weight control and comorbidities after bariatric surgery. Methods We performed a retrospective study in a prospective database. All patients who underwent primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and presented for preoperative consultation of BCS in the same hospital were included in the study. Linear and logistic mixed-effect model analyses were used to evaluate the longitudinal relationships between patients who were accepted or rejected for BCS and their weight loss outcomes or changes in comorbidities. Results Of the 1150 patients who underwent primary RYGB between January 2010 and December 2014, 258 patients (22.4%) presented for preoperative consultation of BCS. Of these patients, 126 patients eventually underwent BCS (48.8%). Patients who were accepted for BCS demonstrated significant better ∆body mass index (BMI) on average over time (− 1.31 kg/m2/year, 95% confidence interval (CI) −2.52 − −0.10, p = 0.034) and percent total weight loss (%TWL) was significantly different at 36 months (5.79, 95%CI 1.22 – 10.37, p = 0.013) and 48 months (6.78, 95%CI 0.93 – 12.63, p = 0.023) after body contouring consultation. Patients who were accepted or rejected did not differ significantly in the maintenance of achieved improvements in comorbidities. Conclusion BCS could not be associated with the maintenance of achieved improvements in comorbidities after bariatric surgery, whereas it could be associated with improved weight loss maintenance at 36 and 48 months after body contouring consultation. This association should be further explored in a large longitudinal study.


Author(s):  
Susanna Pajula ◽  
Mika Gissler ◽  
Janne Jyränki ◽  
Erkki Tukiainen ◽  
Virve Koljonen

2012 ◽  
Vol 130 (5) ◽  
pp. 1133-1139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva S. J. van der Beek ◽  
Rinie Geenen ◽  
Francine A. G. de Heer ◽  
Aebele B. Mink van der Molen ◽  
Bert van Ramshorst

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document