The Effect of Prenotification on Mail Survey Response Rate, Speed, Quality and Cost

Author(s):  
A. J. Faria ◽  
John R. Dickinson ◽  
Timothy V. Filipic
1973 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank J. Landy ◽  
Frederick Bates

1990 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 10-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela A. Weaver ◽  
Esther Chiu ◽  
Ken W. McCleary

1977 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 383-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Mcginnis ◽  
Charles J. Hollon

A study was undertaken to ascertain whether the response rate and responses of a group of technically trained professional employees differed between those who received the questionnaire at work and those who received it at home. Response rates were found to be independent of address, and the frequency of questionnaire item significance was not significantly different from chance.


1977 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. McGinnis ◽  
Charles J. Hollon

1979 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry L. Childers ◽  
O. C. Ferrell

A 2 × 2 factorial experiment was designed to test the impact on mail survey response rate resulting from variations in paper trim size and number of printed pages in the questionnaire. ANOVA findings suggest 8½ × 11″ paper trim size produces a better response rate than an 8½ × 14″ paper trim size. Use of a one-sheet (front and back) versus a two-sheet (front only) questionnaire did not cause a significant difference in response rate; a hypothesized interaction effect was not found to be statistically significant.


1982 ◽  
Vol 51 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1218-1218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chester C. Cotton ◽  
Bruce D. Wonder

1994 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis O. Kaldenberg ◽  
Harold F. Koenig ◽  
Boris W. Becker

1988 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Fox ◽  
Melvin R. Crask ◽  
Jonghoon Kim

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document