Efficiency Evaluation Criteria of Tour Guides’ Communication Activities

2016 ◽  
pp. 209-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Łasiński ◽  
Małgorzata Maria Bogdan
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Efficiency Evaluation ◽  
Tour Guides

scholarly journals A Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method Based on Evaluation Criteria Balanced on Interval Weights

Symmetry ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hailiu Shi ◽  
Yingming Wang ◽  
Xiaoming Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Evaluation Criterion ◽  
Peer Evaluation ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Efficiency Evaluation ◽  
Common Set Of Weights ◽  
The Cross ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Evaluation Approaches

Cross-efficiency evaluation approaches and common set of weights (CSW) approaches have long been suggested as two of the more important and effective methods for the ranking of decision making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA). The former emphasizes the flexibility of evaluation and its weights are asymmetric, while the latter focuses on the standardization of evaluation and its weights are symmetrical. As a compromise between these two approaches, this paper proposes a cross-efficiency evaluation method that is based on two types of flexible evaluation criteria balanced on interval weights. The evaluation criteria can be regarded as macro policy—or means of regulation—according to the industry’s current situation. Unlike current cross-efficiency evaluation methods, which tend to choose the set of weights for peer evaluation based on certain preferences, the cross-efficiency evaluation method based on evaluation criterion determines one set of input and output weights for each DMU. This is done by minimizing the difference between the weights of the DMU and the evaluation criteria, thus ensuring that the cross-evaluation of all DMUs for evaluating peers is as consistent as possible. This method also eliminates prejudice and arbitrariness from peer evaluations. As a result, the proposed cross-efficiency evaluation method not only looks for non-zero weights, but also ranks efficient DMUs completely. The proposed DEA model can be further extended to seek a common set of weights for all DMUs. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the applications of the cross-efficiency evaluation method based on evaluation criterion in DEA ranking.

Efficiency Evaluation Criteria for Series Manufacturing Processes

1984 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 2493-2498
Author(s):  
A. Villa ◽  
B. Fassino ◽  
S. Rossetto
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Manufacturing Processes ◽  
Efficiency Evaluation

Transformation of evaluation criteria of lands withdrawn from agricultural turnover due to radioactive contamination

2020 ◽  
pp. 23-27
Author(s):  
Olga Merzlova
Keyword(s):  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Radioactive Contamination ◽  
Chernobyl Accident ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Contaminated Land ◽  
Degradation Processes ◽  
Agricultural Use ◽  
Land Clearance

One of the measures to eliminate the consequences of the Chernobyl accident was the exclusion of highly contaminated land from agricultural use. Due to the positive dynamics of the radiation situation, the issue of land return becomes relevant. However, in the period of exclusion of these lands the land clearance degradation processes were developing. The second part of the article is devoted to the issue of economic evaluation of the expediency of land return and the mutual coordination of the results of separate stages of complex ecological and economic evaluation. The research was carried out in Mogilev branch Institute of radiology (Republic of Belarus).

Efficiency evaluation of remote sensing space systems based on hierarchy analysis method

2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 75-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
O.D. Fedorovskyi ◽  
◽  
V.G. Yakimchuk ◽  
E.N. Bodnar ◽  
Z.V. Kozlov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Efficiency Evaluation ◽  
Space Systems ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Hierarchy Analysis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document