On Emergence and Forcing in Information Systems Grounded Theory Studies: The Case of Strauss and Corbin

Author(s):  
Stefan Seidel ◽  
Cathy Urquhart
2011 ◽  
pp. 104-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathy Urquhart

The purpose of this chapter is to explore the practical and philosophical issues of applying the grounded theory approach to qualitative research in Information Systems. Over the past decade, we have seen a substantial increase in qualitative research in general (Klein, Nissen and Hirschheim, 1991; Walsham, 1995; Markus, 1997; Myers, 1997; Myers and Walsham, 1998; Klein and Myers, 1999; Walsham and Sahay, 1999; Trauth and Jessup, 2000; Schultze, 2000) and also an increase in the use of grounded theory (Toraskar, 1991, Orlikowski, 1993, Urquhart, 1997, 1998, 1999a, 1999b; Adams and Sasse, 1999, Baskerville and Pries-Heje, 1999, Trauth, 2000). Over the past three years, the most frequent request I have had from postgraduates is for some insight into the ‘how-to’ of coding and grounded theory


2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 224-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathy Urquhart ◽  
Walter Fernández

The use of grounded theory method (GTM) as a research method in information systems (IS) has gradually increased over the years as qualitative research in general has become more prevalent. The method offers a systematic way to generate theory from data, but is rarely used to its full potential in IS as a number of myths and misunderstandings about GTM prevent researchers from getting the full potential out of the method. To address this problem, we advance the general level of knowledge of GTM. We clarify aspects of the method that are often misunderstood by novice users or casual observers and provide guidance to address common problems. Exemplars from the IS literature are used to illustrate the concepts and to promote the informed use of the methodology. By doing so, this paper will contribute to improving the use of the method and to the quality and dissemination of grounded theory research outcomes.


Author(s):  
Sven A. Carlsson

The information systems (IS) field is dominated by positivistic research approaches and theories (Chen & Hirschheim, 2004). IS scholars have pointed out weaknesses in these approaches and theories and in response different strands of post-modern theories and constructivism have gained popularity— see, Lee, Liebenau, and DeGross (1997) and Trauth (2001). The approaches argued for include ethnography, constructivism, grounded theory, and theories like Giddens’ structuration theory and Latour’s actor-network theory. (We refer to these different research approaches and theories as “post-approaches” and “post-theories” when distinction is not required).


2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 1009-1018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome Dauw-Song Zhu ◽  
Chih-Te Lin

The purpose in this study was to explore the antecedents of e-service quality (e-SQ) based on a D&M information systems success model (DeLone & McLean, 1992) by considering e-SQ dimensions as a dependent variable. The consequences of dimensions influencing an individual's loyalty intention based on e-SQ (Harris & Goode, 2004) toward e-business were also examined. Finally, a research framework to identify the antecedents and consequences of e-SQ for e-banking based on grounded theory analysis is proposed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document