Major Amputation of the Lower Extremity for Critical Limb Ischemia

2016 ◽  
pp. 603-617
Author(s):  
Ryan P. Ter Louw ◽  
Benjamin J. Brown ◽  
Christopher E. Attinger
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Critical Limb Ischemia ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Major Amputation

Complete Lower Extremity Revascularization via a Hybrid Procedure for Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshio Takayama ◽  
Jon S. Matsumura
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Critical Limb Ischemia ◽  
Patency Rate ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Major Amputation ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Hybrid Procedure ◽  
Complete Revascularization ◽  
Primary Patency Rate ◽  
Lower Extremity Revascularization

Background: Complete revascularization, achieving inline flow to the foot through at least 1 patent tibioperoneal artery, is considered to be desirable for treating critical limb ischemia (CLI). Hybrid procedure, combined femoral endarterectomy and endovascular treatment, is commonly performed on patients with CLI because they often present with complicated lower extremity lesions involving the common femoral artery. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of complete revascularization (CR) achieved by hybrid procedure on limb salvage in patients with CLI. Methods: Between February 2010 and January 2016, 95 limbs (82 patients) were treated by lower extremity hybrid procedure; of these 95 procedures, 61 were for patients with CLI. We defined CR as achieving inline flow to the foot through at least 1 patent tibioperoneal artery. Complete revascularization was performed on 37 limbs, and incomplete revascularization (IR) was performed on 24 limbs. Specific variables, including patient age, male–female ratio, Rutherford classification, preoperative and postoperative ankle–brachial pressure indices (ABIs), follow-up duration (months), primary patency rate, assisted primary patency rate, secondary patency rate, and major amputation rate, were analyzed. Results: The mean age was similar between the groups 67.2 years in the CR group and 70.7 years in the IR group ( P = .11). Limb ischemia severity was significantly higher in the CR group: 63% of the patients scored Rutherford 5 in the CR group, compared to 30% in the IR group ( P = .027). Mean postoperative ABI was significantly higher in the CR group (CR: 0.87, IR: 0.53; P = .0001). Major amputation rate was higher in the IR group (CR: 2.7%, IR: 13%; P = .29), and major amputation-free survival rate at 3 years after the index procedure was higher in the CR group (CR: 97%, IR: 81%; P = .054). Conclusion: Complete lower extremity revascularization was beneficial for patients with CLI, avoiding major amputation.

scholarly journals Surgeon, Not Institution, Case Volume Is Associated With Limb Outcomes After Lower Extremity Bypass for Critical Limb Ischemia in the Vascular Quality Initiative

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 843-844
Author(s):  
Lily E. Johnston ◽  
Margaret C. Tracci ◽  
John A. Kern ◽  
Kenneth J. Cherry ◽  
Irving L. Kron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Critical Limb Ischemia ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Case Volume

Isolated femoral artery revascularisation with or without iliac inflow improvement – a less invasive surgical option in critical limb ischemia

VASA ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Andreas S. Peters ◽  
Katrin Meisenbacher ◽  
Dorothea Weber ◽  
Theodosios Bisdas ◽  
Giovanni Torsello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Femoral Artery ◽  
Critical Limb Ischemia ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Major Amputation ◽  
Lesion Length ◽  
Vascular Intervention ◽  
Selection Of Variables ◽  
Surgical Option

Summary: Background: Isolated femoral artery revascularisation (iFAR) represents a well-established surgical method in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) involving common femoral artery disease. Data for iFAR in multilevel PAD are inconsistent, particularly in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcome of iFAR in CLI regarding major amputation and reintervention and to identify associated risk factors for this outcome. Patients and methods: The data used have been derived from the German Registry of Firstline Treatment in Critical Limb Ischemia (CRITISCH). A total of 1200 patients were enrolled in 27 vascular centres. This sub-analysis included patients, which were treated with iFAR with/without concomitant iliac intervention. For detection of risk factors for the combined endpoint of major amputation and/or reintervention, selection of variables for multiple regression was conducted using stepwise forward/backward selection by Akaike’s information criterion. Results: 95 patients were included (mean age: 72 years ± 10.82; 64.2% male). Of those, 32 (33.7%) participants reached the combined endpoint. Risk factor analysis revealed continued tobacco use (odds ratio [OR] 2.316, confidence interval [CI] 0.832–6.674), TASC D-lesion (OR: 2.293, CI: 0.869–6.261) and previous vascular intervention in the trial leg (OR: 2.720, CI: 1.037–7.381) to be associated with reaching the combined endpoint. Conclusions: iFAR provides a reasonable, surgical option to treat CLI. Lesion length (TASC D) seems to have a negative impact on outcome. Further research is required to better define the future role of iFAR for combined femoro-popliteal lesions in CLI – best in terms of a randomised controlled trial.

Abstract P380: The Cardiovascular Fate in Patients with Amputation or Revascularization for Critical Limb Ischemia

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 129 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola De Rango ◽  
Massimo Lenti ◽  
Enrico Cieri ◽  
Alessandro Marucchini ◽  
Luca Farchioni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Critical Limb Ischemia ◽  
Strong Predictor ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Major Amputation ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Primary Amputation ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Cox Analysis

Background: Critical limb ischemia (CLI) continues to be a significantly morbid disease for the aging population with high likelihood of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Objective: To analyze incidence and timing of all cause and cardiovascular mortality (CM) in patients who survived after intervention for CLI. Methods: Patients consecutively discharged with diagnosis of CLI during the period 2006-2008 were re-evaluated for cardiovascular morbidity after 2 years. Patients receiving revascularization either open or endovascular and those with primary major amputation were compared with Kaplan-Meier analyses. The effect of treatment on outcome was analyzed with Cox analysis. Results: There were 257 patients (171 men, aged 74.12y), 39 treated by primary major amputation and 218 by revascularization. During a mean follow-up of 37months, 81 patients died for all cause mortality and 35 for CM. Mean survival time was 57.4months. More than half deaths (n=44) occurred by 15 months with 21 patients dying in the first 6 months and 33 within the first 12 months. Thirty-five myocardial infarctions and 15 strokes occurred. Cumulative survival rate at 60 months was 54% for all cause mortality and 79% for CM. There was significantly worse survival in patients with primary amputation when compared to those receiving revascularization: rates for all cause mortality were 45% vs. 75% (p=0.001) and rates for CM were 68% vs. 90% (p<0.0001), in primary amputation and revascularization group respectively at 42 months. Unadjusted odd ratios for all cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with primary amputation vs. revascularization were 3.07 (95%CI 1.5-6.1, p=0.002) and 5.25 (95%CI 2.3-11.6, p<0.0001), respectively. After adjusting for age and gender, primary amputation persisted as independent predictor of all cause (HR 2.76, p<0.0001) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 5.11; p<0.0001). Conclusion: Mortality and CM after 2 years in patients surviving from CLI procedures are high. Primary amputation is a strong predictor of poor prognosis in the mid-long term for patients with CLI. Most deaths occur in the first 15 months after treatment. This data may question the benefits of revascularization.

scholarly journals SIMULTANEOUS REVASCULARIZATION OF AORTOFEMORAL AND FEMOROPOPLITEAL ARTERIAL SEGMENTS BY SEMICLOSED LOOP ENDARTERECTOMY

2017 ◽  
Vol 176 (2) ◽  
pp. 28-32
Author(s):  
V. V. Shlomin ◽  
A. V. Gusinskiy ◽  
M. L. Gordeev ◽  
I. V. Mikhailov ◽  
D. N. Maistrenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Critical Limb Ischemia ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Arterial Occlusive Disease ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Single Level ◽  
Individual Approach ◽  
Chronic Limb Ischemia

OBJECTIVE. The authors would like to consider the possibility and feasibility of simultaneous revascularization of two arterial segments in patients with lower extremity arterial occlusive disease by method of semiclosed loop endarterectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The research included 143 patients. Revascularization of aortofemoral segment was performed on 67 patients. The simultaneous revascularization of aortofemoral and femoropopliteal segments was carried out for 76 patients. The follow-up period was 5 years. RESULTS. There was revealed that the long-term results of multilevel reconstruction were worse that single-level reconstruction. This method requires an individual approach. The best results of simultaneous interventions were obtained in patients aged 60 and older with the III stage of chronic limb ischemia and 2 or 3 working shin arteries. The worst results were observed in patients younger than 50 year old with IV stage of critical limb ischemia and significant lesions of shin arteries.

Abstract 14293: Time to Wound Healing and Major Adverse Limb Events in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia Treated With Endovascular Therapy

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Grant W Reed ◽  
Negar Salehi ◽  
Pejman Raeisi-Giglou ◽  
Umair Malik ◽  
Rami Kafa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Critical Limb Ischemia ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Major Amputation ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Kaplan Meier

Introduction: There have been few studies evaluating the influence of time to wound healing on outcomes in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) after endovascular therapy. Methods: In this prospective study, patients with CLI treated with endovascular therapy were assessed for comorbidities, presence of wounds, wound healing, and major adverse limb events (MALE; major amputation, surgical endartectomy, or bypass) over time. The incidence of MALE was compared across patient and wound characteristics by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Associations between these variables and MALE were determined by Cox proportional hazards analysis. Results: A total of 252 consecutive patients with CLI were treated between November 1, 2011 and April 1, 2015; 179 (71%) had wounds, of which 97 (54%) healed. During median follow-up of 12.7 months (interquartile range 3.9 - 23.9 months), 46 (18%) had MALE. Wounds were associated with a greater risk of MALE (Hazard Ratio [HR] 3.5; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.4-8.9; p=0.008). As a time-dependent covariate, wound healing was associated with less MALE (HR 0.23; 95% CI 0.10-0.53; p<0.001), and MALE was more frequent in patients with unhealed wounds (23% vs 11%; p<0.0001) (Figure - A). There was significantly less MALE in patients whose wounds healed within 4 months (24% vs 10%; p=0.032) (Figure - B), and less major amputation in those with healed wounds within 3 months (16% vs 5%; p=0.033). After multivariate adjustment for age, presence of diabetes, renal function, wound size, and procedural failure, independent predictors of MALE were wound healing as a time-dependent covariate (HR 0.18; 95% CI 0.08 - 0.40; p<0.0001), and creatinine ≥ 2 (HR 2.3; 95% CI 1.3-4.2; p=0.005). Conclusions: A shorter time to wound healing is associated with less MALE in patients with CLI after endovascular therapy. Efforts should be made to achieve wound healing as quickly as possible in this population, especially in those with renal dysfunction.

Preoperative Stress Test and Postoperative MI in Patients Requiring Lower Extremity Bypass for Critical Limb Ischemia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Lee ◽  
Khalil Qato ◽  
Allan Conway ◽  
Nhan Nguyen Tran ◽  
Tung Ming Leung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Critical Limb Ischemia ◽  
Stress Test ◽  
Limb Ischemia
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document