Comparison of Management for Central Venous Stenosis With or Without Previous Catheter Placement

Objective: To compare central venous stenosis/occlusion with or without previous jugular catheter placement history.Methods: Data of patients with central vein stenosis/occlusion receiving endovascular intervention in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2018 were collected and analyzed.Results: Twenty-nine patients with previous jugular catheter placement history (CVC group) and 33 patients (excluded two with technical failure) without such history (non-CVC group) are included in this study. Previous jugular catheter placement history raised the risk of postintervention recurrence 1.02 times (CVC group vs. non-CVC group, HR = 2.02 95%CI: 0.91–4.48). The primary patency rate at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was 76.9, 54.2, 45.5, and 25.0% separately in the CVC group and 80.6, 70.0, 67.9, and 44.4% separately in the non-CVC group. The assisted primary patency rate at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was 92.3, 91.7, 86.4, and 68.8% separately in the CVC group and 93.5, 90.0, 82.1, and 61.1% separately in the non-CVC group. Patients in the CVC group received a higher frequency of reintervention (0.7 times/year/patient vs. 0.3 times/year/patient). There was no significant difference in the assisted primary patency rate between the two groups. Different primary interventions (angioplasty alone, bare metal stent, stent graft) did not affect primary patency and assisted primary patency, but percutaneous transluminal stenting (PTS) with a bare metal stent had a significant lower primary patency rate between 3 and 24 months compared with PTS with a stent graft (p = 0.011).Conclusion: Central venous stenosis/occlusion with a previous jugular catheter placement history develops symptoms earlier and had a worse prognosis after endovascular intervention. More efforts are needed to carry out end-stage kidney disease life plan to reduce the harm of evitable catheter placement.

One-Year Clinical Outcome and Risk Factor Analysis of Directional Atherectomy Followed With Drug-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease

Purpose: This study investigated the 1-year clinical outcomes of directional atherectomy combined with drug-coated balloon (DA + DCB) in femoropopliteal artery disease (FPAD) from real-world experience. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of patients treated between July 2016 and June 2019 using DA + DCB for FPAD. Patients’ demographics, comorbidities, clinical characteristics and outcomes, and angiography and duplex ultrasound findings were analyzed. The 6-month and 1-year primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors of primary patency loss or CD-TLR. Results: Seventy-nine consecutive patients (83 lesions, mean age 70.9 years, 52 men) were included. Twenty-seven limbs had lifestyle-limiting claudication and 56 limbs had critical limb ischemia. There were 73 and 10 limbs with de novo lesion and in-stent restenosis, respectively. The mean lesion length of all the patients was 22.1 cm. The mean length of chronic total occlusions (CTOs) was 8.3 cm. Severe calcification was found in 32.5% cases. The 1-year primary patency rate was 80.8% and freedom from CD-TLR was 92.2%. The bailout stenting rate was 2.4%. Patients with CTO >10 cm had significantly lower 1-year primary patency rate and freedom from CD-TLR than did patients with CTO ≤10 cm. Total length of CTO (stratified as ≤5 cm, 5–10 cm, >10 cm) was identified as an independent risk factor of 1-year primary patency loss and CD-TLR. Conclusion: DA + DCB appears to be a safe and effective endovascular therapy to treat FPAD in real-world clinical practice, with a promising 1-year patency rate with a low rate of bailout stenting.

Clinical predictors of recurrent cephalic arch stenosis and impact of the access flow reduction on the patency rate

Objective: Despite the widespread use of conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), recurrence of cephalic arch stenosis (CAS), and low patency rate after PTA remain challenging problem. We aimed to identify the clinical predictors of recurrence of CAS and evaluate the effect of the access flow reduction on the fistula patency rate in patients with recurrent CAS. Methods: In 1118 angiographies of 220 patients with CAS, access circuit patency rates after PTA and potential clinical predictors of recurrence of CAS were assessed. The effect of the banding procedure was evaluated in terms of post-interventional primary patency rate, and the number of interventions per access-year. Results: At 3, 6, and 12 months after the first PTA on CAS, the post-interventional access circuit primary patency rates were 68.8%, 40.5%, and 25.1%, respectively. High CV to CA ratio (the ratio of the maximal diameter of the distal cephalic vein to the diameter of the cephalic arch) (Hazard ratio (HR), 1.437; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.036–1.992) and involvement of the proximal segment of cephalic arch (HR, 1.828; 95% CI, 1.194–2.801) were significant predictors of recurrent CAS. For those with recurrent CAS (>3 times/year) and an access flow rate >1.5 L/minute, endovascular banding procedure was performed. The banding procedure significantly reduced the number of interventions per access-year ( t = 3.299, p = 0.005 and t = 2.989, p = 0.007, respectively). Post-interventional access circuit primary patency rate after banding was significantly higher than that before banding ( p = 0.01). Conclusions: High CV to CA ratio and involvement of the proximal segment of the cephalic arch are independent clinical predictors of recurrent CAS. Endovascular banding might delay recurrence of CAS in patients with high CV to CA ratio and high access flow.

Venous stent versus conventional stent for the treatment of central vein obstruction in hemodialysis patients: a retrospective study

Background Endovascular treatment is a first-line treatment for upper thoracic central vein obstruction (CVO). Few studies using bare venous stents (BVS) in CVO have been conducted. Purpose To evaluate the treatment performance of upper thoracic central vein stenosis between BVS and conventional bare stent (CBS) in hemodialysis patients. Methods Hemodialysis patients with upper thoracic central vein obstruction who underwent endovascular treatment at the interventional unit of our institution from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2018 were enrolled in the present study. CBS was used to treat central vein obstruction in 43 patients and BVS in 34 patients. We compared the primary patency rates and complications between the two stent types. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results The patient demographic data between the CBS and BVS groups were similar. The characteristics of the lesions, procedures, and complications were not significantly different between the two groups ( P > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences of primary patency rates at three and six months between the BVS and CBS groups (94.1% vs. 86.0% and 73.5% vs. 58.1%, respectively; P > 0.05). The primary patency rate at 12 months in the BVS group was significantly higher than that in the CBS group (61.8% vs. 32.6%; P = 0.008). Conclusion Endovascular treatment of central vein obstruction with BVS provided a higher primary patency rate at 12 months than CBS.

A modified banding technique: experience of a center

ABSTRACT Background: A well-functioning vascular access is vital to patients on regular hemodialysis. Banding the access is indicated in high-flow-associated steal syndrome. It allows for the reduction of access flow while maintaining distal limb perfusion. Nonetheless, this procedure has some limitations as it can cause hemorrhage, infection, aneurysm formation, thrombosis of access in cases of overbanding, or otherwise insufficient reduction of vascular flow. Other surgical techniques to achieve the same benefit would be useful. Methods: We performed a modified banding technique without endovascular placement of the angioplasty balloon, which is a viable alternative to other techniques. This surgery was performed in patients on chronic dialysis with steal syndrome. Pre- and post-operative access flows were measured and resolution of symptoms was recorded. Primary patency rate was defined as the intervention-free access survival from the operative time. Results: We verified that this technique allowed for access flow reduction in all our six patients, with total resolution of symptoms in all patients. Primary patency rate at 12 months was 100%. No major complications were noted during our follow-up. Conclusions: This technique allows for correction of high-flow arteriovenous fistulas in an efficient and safe way, and can be a viable alternative to other banding procedures.

Comparison of pharmacomechanical and surgical interventions for thrombosed native arteriovenous fistulas

Background: This study aims to compare success and patency rates of pharmacomechanical thrombectomy versus open surgical thrombectomy for thrombosed native arteriovenous fistulas. Methods: A total of 96 patients (56 males, 40 females; mean age 61±11.7 years; range, 26 to 82 years) with a thrombosed native arteriovenous fistula between January 2016 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups as pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (n=42) and open surgical thrombectomy (n=54). Primary failure rate and primary patency rate at 6 and 12 months were recorded. Results: Of 42 patients in the pharmacomechanical thrombectomy group, 41 (98%) had additional interventions, and primary failure occurred in four patients (10%). Primary failure was seen in 15 (28%) patients in the surgical group. The primary patency rates at 6 and 12 months were significantly higher in the pharmacomechanical treatment group than the surgical group (85% vs. 67% and 78% vs. 55%, respectively; p<0.05). Conclusion: Pharmacomechanical thrombectomy procedure yields higher primary patency rates than open surgical thrombectomy for thrombosed native arteriovenous fistula.

Heparin-Bonded Stent-Graft for the Treatment of TASC II C and D Femoropopliteal Lesions: 36-Month Results of the Viabahn 25 cm Trial

Purpose: To evaluate the 36-month technical and clinical outcome after implantation of the 25-cm Viabahn endoprosthesis with Propaten bioactive surface in TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II C and D lesions of the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries. Materials and Methods: This prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier NCT01263665) enrolled 71 patients (mean age 66.7±8.3 years; 50 men) with lifestyle-limiting claudication or rest pain (Rutherford category 2–4) and long (>20-cm) lesions of the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries. Primary endpoint was primary patency at 36 months. Secondary endpoints included primary assisted patency; secondary patency; freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR); freedom from a composite of death, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and amputation; clinical success; and freedom from device fracture. Results: Primary patency estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 40.6% at 36 months. Primary assisted patency and secondary patency estimates were 53.0% and 96.9%, respectively. Within 36 months, 27 patients had to undergo a TLR. Twenty-five patients (35.2%) had a TVR. Freedom from the composite of death, TVR, and amputation endpoint was 44.5%. The estimate of the sustained clinical success with stable or improved Rutherford category was 58.5%. No stent fracture was detected during follow-up. Conclusion: The primary patency rate without reintervention after treatment of long femoropopliteal lesions is low. However, secondary patency after implantation of a Viabahn endoprosthesis is high and seems to be superior to the use of other revascularization techniques, resulting in persistent clinical improvement.

Different risk factors are associated with vascular access patency after construction and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients starting hemodialysis

Background: The objective of this multicenter, prospective observational study was to determine the factors related to patency rates after construction of vascular access (VA) and the first percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). Methods: The 24-month primary and secondary patency rates after construction of a radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (RC-AVF) and arteriovenous graft (AVG) were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. The 12-month post-PTA patency rate was also investigated. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify clinical parameters associated with the primary patency rate and the post-PTA patency rate. Results: A total of 611 patients were enrolled in the study. The primary patency rate after VA construction was lower in hemodialysis (HD) patients with an AVG than in those with an AVF. Aging (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02 per 1 year; p < 0.001), female sex (HR, 1.41; p = 0.03), diabetes mellitus (HR, 1.37; p = 0.03), low serum albumin (HR, 0.76 per 1-g/dL decrease; p = 0.02), and use of an erythropoietin-stimulating agent (HR, 1.62; p = 0.02) were risk factors for VA problems. The post-PTA patency rate was associated with aging (HR, 1.02; p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (HR, 1.49; p = 0.02), polycystic kidney disease (HR, 2.14; p = 0.01), temporary catheter use for initiation of HD (HR, 1.60; p = 0.02), and period from VA construction to use (HR, 0.99; p = 0.04). Conclusion: Although a poor patency rate is commonly associated with advanced age and diabetes, different risk factors affect patency between VA construction and the first PTA.

Retrograde Versus Antegrade Approach for the Endovascular Treatment of Symptomatic Femoropopliteal Disease: Results of the 2-Year Follow Up

Objective: To compare the antegrade and retrograde approaches, in terms of access site complications and long-term patency in subjects undergoing EVT for symptomatic SFA or popliteal artery stenosis or occlusions. Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent retrograde recanalization for partial stenosis or chronic total occlusion of the SFA or PA at 2 centers were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. Subjects were divided into 2 groups, according to the approach selected for EVT as antegrade approach group or retrograde approach group. The rate of primary patency, which was defined as the lack of restenosis at the target lesion, was the primary outcome measure, during the follow-up evaluations. The rate of procedural complications, including hematoma, bleeding, and distal embolism, were secondary outcome measures. Results: A significant improvement occurred in ABI, following the intervention in both the antegrade approach group [0.7 (0.3 - 1.1) versus 0.85 (0.4 - 1.3), P < 0.001] and retrograde approach group [0.5 (0.3 - 1.1) versus 0.8 (0.3 - 1.3), P < .001]. The primary patency rate at the 1st, 6th, 12th and 24th months of the intervention in the antegrade approach group were 94.85%, 83.82%, 74.26%, and 66.91%, respectively. The primary patency rate at the 1st, 6th, 12th, and 24th months of the intervention in the retrograde approach group were 93.33%, 86.67%, 84.44%, and 71.11%, respectively. The groups were similar with respect to the primary patency rates. The rate of complications, including hematoma, bleeding, and distal embolization was similar in the 2 groups. Conclusion: Antegrade approach and retrograde approach provide a similar safety profile in the EVT of SFA and popliteal artery stenosis and occlusion. The primary patency rates at the 1st, 6th, 12th, and 24th months of follow up also were similar in the 2 groups. However, the significant difference in the lesion characteristics of the subjects undergoing retrograde or antegrade approach complicates the ability to reach a clear conclusion, regarding the superiority of one technique over the other.