Why Work? What Does Philosophy (Not) Tell Us About Worker Motivation?

Author(s):  
Dale Tweedie
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaya Gupta ◽  
Mariya C. Patwa ◽  
Angel Khuu ◽  
Andreea A. Creanga

AbstractPoor health worker motivation, and the resultant shortages and geographic imbalances of providers, impedes the provision of quality care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This systematic review summarizes the evidence on interventions used to motivate health workers in LMICs. A standardized keyword search strategy was employed across five databases from September 2007 -September 2017. Studies had to meet the following criteria: original study; doctors and/or nurses as target population for intervention(s); work motivation as study outcome; study design with clearly defined comparison group; categorized as either a supervision, compensation, systems support, or lifelong learning intervention; and conducted in a LMIC setting. Two independent reviewers screened 3845 titles and abstracts and, subsequently, reviewed 269 full articles. Seven studies were retained from China (n = 1), Ghana (n = 2), Iran (n = 1), Mozambique (n = 1), and Zambia (n = 2). Study data and risk of bias were extracted using a standardized form. Though work motivation was the primary study outcome, four studies did not provide an outcome definition and five studies did not describe use of a theoretical framework in the ascertainment. Four studies used a randomized trial—group design, one used a non-randomized trial—group design, one used a cross-sectional design, and one used a pretest–posttest design. All three studies that found a significant positive effect on motivational outcomes had a supervision component. Of the three studies that found no effects on motivation, two were primarily compensation interventions and the third was a systems support intervention. One study found a significant negative effect of a compensation intervention on health worker motivation. In conducting this systematic review, we found there is limited evidence on successful interventions to motivate health workers in LMICs. True effects on select categories of health workers may have been obscured given that studies included health workers with a wide range of social and professional characteristics. Robust studies that use validated and culturally appropriate tools to assess worker motivation are greatly needed in the Sustainable Development Goals era.


2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 10 ◽  
pp. 21-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Conrad Musinguzi ◽  
Leticia Namale ◽  
Elizeus Rutebemberwa ◽  
Aruna Dahal ◽  
Patricia Nahirya-Ntege ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Borghi ◽  
J Lohmann ◽  
E Dale ◽  
F Meheus ◽  
J Goudge ◽  
...  

Abstract A health system’s ability to deliver quality health care depends on the availability of motivated health workers, which are insufficient in many low income settings. Increasing policy and researcher attention is directed towards understanding what drives health worker motivation and how different policy interventions affect motivation, as motivation is key to performance and quality of care outcomes. As a result, there is growing interest among researchers in measuring motivation within health worker surveys. However, there is currently limited guidance on how to conceptualize and approach measurement and how to validate or analyse motivation data collected from health worker surveys, resulting in inconsistent and sometimes poor quality measures. This paper begins by discussing how motivation can be conceptualized, then sets out the steps in developing questions to measure motivation within health worker surveys and in ensuring data quality through validity and reliability tests. The paper also discusses analysis of the resulting motivation measure/s. This paper aims to promote high quality research that will generate policy relevant and useful evidence.


2004 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 343-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynne Miller Franco ◽  
Sara Bennett ◽  
Ruth Kanfer ◽  
Patrick Stubblebine

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 13-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kouroush Jenab ◽  
Selva Staub

This study reports on the effects of management style in successful implementation of Six Sigma. The authors collected data using a 18-item survey, classified managers from a wide range of industry, healthcare, military, and services into one of two management styles using Douglas McGregor’s Theory of X and Y, and compared these classifications among the survey respondents to determine the level of Six Sigma commitment and success. Six Sigma is just one of many tools used to improve processes within an organization that requires management commitment. This level of commitment will depend on a manager perception of worker motivation. Despite an existing body of literature on worker motivation, limited research has been conducted that explores the possible connection between manager perception of worker motivation and the organization’s commitment and success with Six Sigma. The results are explored further in the article.


Ergonomics ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. S. MINORS ◽  
J. M. WATERHOUSE

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Kaba Alhassan ◽  
Nicole Spieker ◽  
Paul van Ostenberg ◽  
Alice Ogink ◽  
Edward Nketiah-Amponsah ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document