scholarly journals Approaches to motivate physicians and nurses in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaya Gupta ◽  
Mariya C. Patwa ◽  
Angel Khuu ◽  
Andreea A. Creanga
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Health Worker ◽  
Work Motivation ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Trial Group ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Worker Motivation

AbstractPoor health worker motivation, and the resultant shortages and geographic imbalances of providers, impedes the provision of quality care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This systematic review summarizes the evidence on interventions used to motivate health workers in LMICs. A standardized keyword search strategy was employed across five databases from September 2007 -September 2017. Studies had to meet the following criteria: original study; doctors and/or nurses as target population for intervention(s); work motivation as study outcome; study design with clearly defined comparison group; categorized as either a supervision, compensation, systems support, or lifelong learning intervention; and conducted in a LMIC setting. Two independent reviewers screened 3845 titles and abstracts and, subsequently, reviewed 269 full articles. Seven studies were retained from China (n = 1), Ghana (n = 2), Iran (n = 1), Mozambique (n = 1), and Zambia (n = 2). Study data and risk of bias were extracted using a standardized form. Though work motivation was the primary study outcome, four studies did not provide an outcome definition and five studies did not describe use of a theoretical framework in the ascertainment. Four studies used a randomized trial—group design, one used a non-randomized trial—group design, one used a cross-sectional design, and one used a pretest–posttest design. All three studies that found a significant positive effect on motivational outcomes had a supervision component. Of the three studies that found no effects on motivation, two were primarily compensation interventions and the third was a systems support intervention. One study found a significant negative effect of a compensation intervention on health worker motivation. In conducting this systematic review, we found there is limited evidence on successful interventions to motivate health workers in LMICs. True effects on select categories of health workers may have been obscured given that studies included health workers with a wide range of social and professional characteristics. Robust studies that use validated and culturally appropriate tools to assess worker motivation are greatly needed in the Sustainable Development Goals era.

scholarly journals How to do (or not to do)… Measuring health worker motivation in surveys in low- and middle-income countries

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Borghi ◽  
J Lohmann ◽  
E Dale ◽  
F Meheus ◽  
J Goudge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Worker ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
High Quality Research ◽  
Quality Health Care ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Health Worker Motivation ◽  
Worker Motivation

Abstract A health system’s ability to deliver quality health care depends on the availability of motivated health workers, which are insufficient in many low income settings. Increasing policy and researcher attention is directed towards understanding what drives health worker motivation and how different policy interventions affect motivation, as motivation is key to performance and quality of care outcomes. As a result, there is growing interest among researchers in measuring motivation within health worker surveys. However, there is currently limited guidance on how to conceptualize and approach measurement and how to validate or analyse motivation data collected from health worker surveys, resulting in inconsistent and sometimes poor quality measures. This paper begins by discussing how motivation can be conceptualized, then sets out the steps in developing questions to measure motivation within health worker surveys and in ensuring data quality through validity and reliability tests. The paper also discusses analysis of the resulting motivation measure/s. This paper aims to promote high quality research that will generate policy relevant and useful evidence.

scholarly journals Using mHealth to Improve Usage of Antenatal Care, Postnatal Care, and Immunization: A Systematic Review of the Literature

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Watterson ◽  
Julia Walsh ◽  
Isheeta Madeka
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Behavior Change ◽  
Antenatal Care ◽  
Postnatal Care ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
African Countries ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Mobile health (mHealth) technologies have been implemented in many low- and middle-income countries to address challenges in maternal and child health. Many of these technologies attempt to influence patients’, caretakers’, or health workers’ behavior. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to determine what evidence exists for the effectiveness of mHealth tools to increase the coverage and use of antenatal care (ANC), postnatal care (PNC), and childhood immunizations through behavior change in low- and middle-income countries. The full text of 53 articles was reviewed and 10 articles were identified that met all inclusion criteria. The majority of studies used text or voice message reminders to influence patient behavior change (80%,n=8) and most were conducted in African countries (80%,n=8). All studies showed at least some evidence of effectiveness at changing behavior to improve antenatal care attendance, postnatal care attendance, or childhood immunization rates. However, many of the studies were observational and further rigorous evaluation of mHealth programs is needed in a broader variety of settings.

scholarly journals Organizational factors associated with health worker protection during the COVID-19 pandemic in four provinces of South Africa

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muzimkhulu Zungu ◽  
Kuku Voyi ◽  
Nosimilo Mlangeni ◽  
Saiendhra Vasudevan Moodley ◽  
Jonathan Ramodike ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Occupational Health ◽  
Health Worker ◽  
Personal Protective Equipment ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Health Facilities ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Middle Income Countries

Abstract Background Health workers, in short supply in many low-and-middle-income countries, are at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study aimed to assess how South Africa, prepared to protect its health workers from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods This was a cross-sectional study design applying participatory action research in four provinces of South Africa. A semi-structured questionnaire and a qualitative observational HealthWISE walkthrough risk assessment was carried out to collect data on occupational safety and health (OSH) systems in 45 hospitals across four provinces to identify factors associated with health worker protection. Adapting the International Labour Organization (ILO) and World Health Organization (WHO) HealthWISE tool, we compiled compliance scores through walkthrough surveys. We used logistic regression to analyze the relationship between readiness indicators and the actual implementation of protective measures. Results We found that health facilities in all four provinces had SARS-CoV-2 plans for the general population but no comprehensive OHS plan for health workers. Provincial Departments of Health (PDoH) varied in how they were organized to respond: Provinces A and D had an OSH SARS-CoV-2 provincial coordinating team and a dedicated budget for occupational health; Province A had an occupational health doctor and nurse; while Province B had an occupational health nurse; Province A and D PDoHs had functional OSH committees; and Province D had conducted some health risk assessments specific to SARS-CoV-2. However, none of the assessed health facilities had an acceptable HealthWISE compliance score (≥ 75%) due to poor ventilation and inadequate administrative control measures. While the supply of personal protective equipment was adequate, it was often not worn properly. Our study found that having an OSH SARS-CoV-2 policy was significantly associated with higher personal protective equipment and ventilation scores. In addition, our analysis showed that hospitals with higher compliance scores had significantly lower infection rates (IRR 0.98; 95% CI: 0.97, 0.98). Conclusions Despite some initial preparedness, greater effort to protect health workers is still warranted. Low-and-middle-income countries may need to pay more attention to OSH systems and consider using tools, such as ILO/WHO HealthWISE tool, to protect health workers’ health.

scholarly journals A Practical Measure of Health Facility Efficiency: an Innovation in the Application of Routine Health Information to Determine Health Worker Productivity in Ethiopia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md Zabir Hasan ◽  
Girmaye D. Dinsa ◽  
Peter Berman
Keyword(s):  
Health Worker ◽  
Health Facility ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Practical Application ◽  
Summary Measure ◽  
Worker Productivity ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Abstract BackgroundA simple indicator of technical efficiency, such as productivity of health workers, measured using routine health facility data, can be a practical approach that can inform initiatives to improve efficiency in low and middle-income countries. This paper presents a proof of concept of using routine information from primary healthcare (PHC) facilities to measure health workers’ productivity and its application in three regions of Ethiopia.MethodsIn four steps, we constructed a productivity measure of the health workforce of Health Centers (HCs) and demonstrated its practical application: (1) developing an analytical dataset using secondary data from health management information systems (HMIS) and human resource information system (HRIS); (2) principal component analysis and factor analysis to estimate a summary measure of output from five indicators (annual service volume of outpatient visits, family planning, first antenatal care visits, facility-based deliveries by skilled birth attendance, and children [<1 year] with three pentavalent vaccines); (3) calculating a productivity score by combining the summary measure and the total number of health workers (input); and (4) implementing regression models to identify the determinant of productivity and ranking HCs based on their adjusted productivity score. ResultsWe developed an analytical dataset of 1,128 HCs; however, significant missing values and outliers were reported in the data. The principal component and factor scores developed from the five output measures were highly consistent (correlation coefficient = 0.98). We considered the factor score as the summary measure of outputs for estimating productivity. A very weak association was observed between the summary measure of output and the total number of staff. The result also highlighted a large variability in productivity across similar health facilities in Ethiopia, represented by the significant dispersion in summary measure of output occurring at similar levels of the health workers. ConclusionsWe successfully demonstrated the analytical steps to estimate health worker productivity and its practical application using HMIS and HRIS. The methodology presented in this study can be readily applied in low and middle-income countries using widely available data – such as DHIS2 – that will allow further explorations to understand the causes of technical inefficiencies in the health system.

Utilization of traditional medicine in primary health care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 1070-1083
Author(s):  
Jae Kyoun Kim ◽  
Kyeong Han Kim ◽  
Yong Cheol Shin ◽  
Bo-Hyoung Jang ◽  
Seong-Gyu Ko
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Traditional Medicine ◽  
National Health ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Referral System ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Primary Health

Abstract This paper reports the findings from the first systematic review of the utilization of traditional medicine (TM) in primary health care (PHC) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). PHC is an important component of health care and essential for achieving universal health coverage (UHC). For countries where there is a gap in PHC, TM plays a vital role. It is widely used and has the potential to increase the coverage of PHC and UHC. Hence in situations where TM is recognized in a considerable magnitude, there are scarce evidence and minimal regulation on it and TM practitioners (TMPs). This study aims to identify the current situation in the utilization of TM in PHC or UHC in LMICs. A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative and quantitative studies have been conducted. A total of 56 articles met the criteria and were included in the review. In all, 14 analytic themes have been developed including the current use of TM in PHC, higher accessibility of TM, medical pluralism, national health system, national health policy and national health insurance to include TM, including TMPs in the referral system, utilizing TMPs as community health workers, the needs of scientific research on TM and the need for training both TMPs and conventional medical staffs for better collaboration. The study concluded that it is necessary to further focus on TM in the macro level on strengthening the referral system by including TM to establish a comprehensive service delivery network under UHC and in the micro level to focus on training the TMPs and conventional medicine health workers on both areas to attain more in-depth understanding of each other, which can lead to better collaboration and quality patient care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document