Professional Growth Through Activities and Assessment Tools Used in Mathematics Teacher Preparation Programs

2017 ◽  
pp. 141-151
Author(s):  
JeongSuk Pang
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Preparation ◽  
Mathematics Teacher ◽  
Professional Growth ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Teacher Preparation Programs ◽  
Preparation Programs ◽  
Mathematics Teacher Preparation

Teacher Professional Dispositions: Much Assemblage Required

2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (11) ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
Kathryn Strom ◽  
Jason Margolis ◽  
Nihat Polat
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Preparation ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Teacher Preparation Programs ◽  
Teacher Dispositions ◽  
Complex Nature ◽  
Preparation Programs ◽  
Professional Dispositions ◽  
State Education ◽  
Nature Of Teaching

Background/Context Despite noted difficulties with defining and assessing teacher dispositions, U.S. state education departments and national accreditation agencies have included dispositions in mandates and standards both for determining teacher quality and for assessing the quality of the teacher preparation programs that certify them. Thus, there remains a significant impetus to specify dispositions to assess, identify what “good” dispositions look like in practice, and determine the best way to measure them. Purpose The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, we aim to problematize the construct of “teacher dispositions” through a critical synthesis of literature and a discussion of a rhizomatic perspective to generate a (re)conceptualization that is more closely aligned with the immensely complex nature of teaching and learning. Second, we draw on samples of university-generated teacher disposition assessment tools to provide concrete examples that “put to work” this complex perspective on dispositions. Research Design To apply ideas introduced in our rhizomatic framework focused on multiple, dynamic assemblages, we conducted a qualitative textual analysis of a sample of 16 widely available assessment tools used by university-based teacher preparation programs to measure teachers’ professional dispositions. Findings and Conclusions Overall, the vast majority of disposition criteria included in the tools reviewed were temporal and relational, seeking to assess the interactions of the teacher candidate amidst a variety of potential circumstances as well as material and discursive factors. This reveals a paradox, however, since, despite their more contextual phrasing, these criteria ultimately seek to assess an individual and are high-stakes only for that teacher. Yet, we suggest that the results of this review may be an indication that the field is moving toward a more multifaceted vision of teaching that can better take into account the dynamic, situated, and relational nature of teaching activity. We also suggest the language accounting for some of the complexity of teaching in the disposition assessment tools we reviewed may be an entry point into a more dynamic, vital materialist vision of the profession.

Transforming Preservice Mathematics Teacher Knowledge for and with the Enacted Curriculum

2016 ◽  
pp. 215-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alden J. Edson ◽  
Amanda Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Preparation ◽  
Teacher Knowledge ◽  
Mathematics Teacher ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Instructional Materials ◽  
Teacher Preparation Programs ◽  
Preparation Programs ◽  
Pedagogical Content ◽  
Enacted Curriculum

In a curriculum system, instructional materials and their enactment impacts students learning of school mathematics. In this chapter, the authors re-examine enacted curriculum in light of research on Digital Instructional Materials (DIMs) and the critical role of the mathematics teacher. This chapter documents research from two different studies suggesting that, while effectively leveraging digital materials may require teachers to think outside of their traditional views of how mathematics content is learned and communicated, doing so requires more than the resources themselves. In order to seize upon the potential for DIMs to support student learning in mathematics, teacher preparation must offer opportunities for teachers to develop and transform their technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) knowledge for and with DIMs. To this end, the authors propose specific recommendations for teacher preparation programs in the digital age.

Transforming Preservice Mathematics Teacher Knowledge for and With the Enacted Curriculum

2018 ◽  
pp. 1647-1672
Author(s):  
Alden J. Edson ◽  
Amanda Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Preparation ◽  
Teacher Knowledge ◽  
Mathematics Teacher ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Instructional Materials ◽  
Teacher Preparation Programs ◽  
Preparation Programs ◽  
Pedagogical Content ◽  
Enacted Curriculum

In a curriculum system, instructional materials and their enactment impacts students learning of school mathematics. In this chapter, the authors re-examine enacted curriculum in light of research on Digital Instructional Materials (DIMs) and the critical role of the mathematics teacher. This chapter documents research from two different studies suggesting that, while effectively leveraging digital materials may require teachers to think outside of their traditional views of how mathematics content is learned and communicated, doing so requires more than the resources themselves. In order to seize upon the potential for DIMs to support student learning in mathematics, teacher preparation must offer opportunities for teachers to develop and transform their technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) knowledge for and with DIMs. To this end, the authors propose specific recommendations for teacher preparation programs in the digital age.

Soundoff!: What I Wish I Had Known about Mathematics When I Started Teaching: Suggestions for Teacher-Preparation Programs

1998 ◽  
Vol 91 (5) ◽  
pp. 372-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Al Cuoco
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Preparation ◽  
Mathematics Teacher ◽  
Teacher Preparation Programs ◽  
National Council ◽  
Preparation Programs

The views expressed in “Soundoff!” reflect the views of the author and not necessarily those of the Editorial Panel of the Mathematics Teacher or the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Readers are encouraged to respond to this editorial by sending doublespaced letters to the Mathematics Teacher for possible publication in “Reader Reflections.” Editorials from readers are welcomed.

scholarly journals Comparing the Mathematical Practices Pre-Service Teachers and Mathematics Teacher Educators Identified as Relevant to Problems and Tasks

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 954-971
Author(s):  
Scott A. Courtney ◽  
Joanne Caniglia
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Preparation ◽  
Mathematics Teacher ◽  
Teacher Educators ◽  
Mathematical Practice ◽  
Teacher Preparation Programs ◽  
Habits Of Mind ◽  
Preparation Programs ◽  
Mathematical Practices ◽  
Mathematics Teacher Educators ◽  
And Mathematics

In the U.S., state adopted or developed college- and career-ready mathematics standards, including the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics, not only impact districts, students, and their teachers, but also university teacher preparation programs. In order to attain and sustain Common Core’s vision of developing mathematically competent citizens, teacher preparation programs must support pre-service teachers’ development of practical conceptions of the Standards for Mathematical Practice. In this article, we examine the mathematical practices middle grades pre-service teachers (grades 4-9 licensure) and mathematics teacher educators identified as playing a role in attempts to make sense of and work toward solutions to mathematics problems. In addition, we compare the mathematical practices indicated both within and across pre-service teachers and mathematics teacher educators. Results identify pre-service teachers’ potential difficulties operationalizing six specific mathematical habits of mind. Finally, we describe how such comparisons can guide the design of future teacher education and professional learning by describing a process for identifying problems and tasks with the greatest potential to support pre-service teachers’ development of practical conceptions of mathematics or other content-specific habits of mind.

scholarly journals Balancing Stakeholders Interests In Evolving Teacher Education Accreditation Contexts

2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-58
Author(s):  
Alison Elliott
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Education ◽  
Teacher Preparation ◽  
Professional Growth ◽  
Charles Darwin ◽  
Teaching Quality ◽  
Teacher Preparation Programs ◽  
College Level ◽  
Preparation Programs ◽  
The University

While Australian teacher education programs have long had rigorous accreditation pathways at the University level they have not been subject to the same formal public or professional scrutiny typical of professions such as medicine, nursing or engineering. Professional accreditation for teacher preparation programs is relatively new and is linked to teacher registration which in itself is relatively recent in most jurisdictions. As elsewhere, the goal of accreditation is to enhance the overall quality of teacher preparation programs and to meet jurisdictional requirements for initial teacher competence.Any new system of quality control takes time to develop and to embed into professional cultures and academic processes at the university or college level. Accreditation processes are no exception and Australia is grappling to develop procedures that meet jurisdictional legislative requirements, assure the public of the quality of teacher preparation and suit the professional context for each state. As yet these procedures have not focused on professional growth, accomplished or expert teaching, or quality within specific areas of preparation. While all agree that the ultimate goal of accreditation is quality assurance- to improve teaching quality in schools, negotiating optimum pathways to quality outcomes is no easy task in a country with an education system and population as diverse as Australia.This paper considers some of the practical and institutional issues confronting teacher education providers as they come to terms with new regulatory environments that require external accreditation of teacher education to meet varying state and national policy agendas. Specifically, it focuses on issues engaging a small and regional teacher education provider, Charles Darwin University as it negotiates developing registration and accreditation requirements. It also flags the need to improve teacher quality through acknowledgement of advanced practice in teaching and expert performance in delivering teacher education.

Transforming Preservice Mathematics Teacher Knowledge for and With the Enacted Curriculum

TPACK ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 96-121
Author(s):  
Alden J. Edson ◽  
Amanda Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Preparation ◽  
Teacher Knowledge ◽  
Mathematics Teacher ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Instructional Materials ◽  
Teacher Preparation Programs ◽  
Preparation Programs ◽  
Pedagogical Content ◽  
Enacted Curriculum

In a curriculum system, instructional materials and their enactment impacts students learning of school mathematics. In this chapter, the authors re-examine enacted curriculum in light of research on Digital Instructional Materials (DIMs) and the critical role of the mathematics teacher. This chapter documents research from two different studies suggesting that, while effectively leveraging digital materials may require teachers to think outside of their traditional views of how mathematics content is learned and communicated, doing so requires more than the resources themselves. In order to seize upon the potential for DIMs to support student learning in mathematics, teacher preparation must offer opportunities for teachers to develop and transform their technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) knowledge for and with DIMs. To this end, the authors propose specific recommendations for teacher preparation programs in the digital age.

Assessing and Evaluating Teacher Preparation Programs

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank C. Worrell ◽  
Mary M. Brabeck ◽  
Carol Anne Dwyer ◽  
Kurt F. Geisinger ◽  
Ronald W. Marx ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Preparation ◽  
Teacher Preparation Programs ◽  
Preparation Programs
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document