A Multi-objective Approach to Multi-period: Portfolio Optimization with Transaction Costs

2017 ◽  
pp. 93-112
Author(s):  
Marius Radulescu ◽  
Constanta Zoie Radulescu
Keyword(s):  
Transaction Costs ◽  
Portfolio Optimization ◽  
Multi Objective

scholarly journals A New Approach to Group Multi-Objective Optimization under Imperfect Information and Its Application to Project Portfolio Optimization

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 4575
Author(s):  
Eduardo Fernández ◽  
Nelson Rangel-Valdez ◽  
Laura Cruz-Reyes ◽  
Claudia Gomez-Santillan
Keyword(s):  
Portfolio Optimization ◽  
Imperfect Information ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Project Portfolio ◽  
Objective Functions ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Group Member

This paper addresses group multi-objective optimization under a new perspective. For each point in the feasible decision set, satisfaction or dissatisfaction from each group member is determined by a multi-criteria ordinal classification approach, based on comparing solutions with a limiting boundary between classes “unsatisfactory” and “satisfactory”. The whole group satisfaction can be maximized, finding solutions as close as possible to the ideal consensus. The group moderator is in charge of making the final decision, finding the best compromise between the collective satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Imperfect information on values of objective functions, required and available resources, and decision model parameters are handled by using interval numbers. Two different kinds of multi-criteria decision models are considered: (i) an interval outranking approach and (ii) an interval weighted-sum value function. The proposal is more general than other approaches to group multi-objective optimization since (a) some (even all) objective values may be not the same for different DMs; (b) each group member may consider their own set of objective functions and constraints; (c) objective values may be imprecise or uncertain; (d) imperfect information on resources availability and requirements may be handled; (e) each group member may have their own perception about the availability of resources and the requirement of resources per activity. An important application of the new approach is collective multi-objective project portfolio optimization. This is illustrated by solving a real size group many-objective project portfolio optimization problem using evolutionary computation tools.

scholarly journals Modeling and Optimizing the Multi-Objective Portfolio Optimization Problem with Trapezoidal Fuzzy Parameters

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Alejandro Estrada-Padilla ◽  
Daniela Lopez-Garcia ◽  
Claudia Gómez-Santillán ◽  
Héctor Joaquín Fraire-Huacuja ◽  
Laura Cruz-Reyes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Portfolio Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Solution Process ◽  
Density Estimator ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Spatial Spread ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Portfolio Optimization Problem

A common issue in the Multi-Objective Portfolio Optimization Problem (MOPOP) is the presence of uncertainty that affects individual decisions, e.g., variations on resources or benefits of projects. Fuzzy numbers are successful in dealing with imprecise numerical quantities, and they found numerous applications in optimization. However, so far, they have not been used to tackle uncertainty in MOPOP. Hence, this work proposes to tackle MOPOP’s uncertainty with a new optimization model based on fuzzy trapezoidal parameters. Additionally, it proposes three novel steady-state algorithms as the model’s solution process. One approach integrates the Fuzzy Adaptive Multi-objective Evolutionary (FAME) methodology; the other two apply the Non-Dominated Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) methodology. One steady-state algorithm uses the Spatial Spread Deviation as a density estimator to improve the Pareto fronts’ distribution. This research work’s final contribution is developing a new defuzzification mapping that allows measuring algorithms’ performance using widely known metrics. The results show a significant difference in performance favoring the proposed steady-state algorithm based on the FAME methodology.

Portfolio optimization with transaction costs: a two-period mean-variance model

2014 ◽  
Vol 233 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Hui Fu ◽  
Kien Ming Ng ◽  
Boray Huang ◽  
Huei Chuen Huang
Keyword(s):  
Transaction Costs ◽  
Portfolio Optimization ◽  
Variance Model ◽  
Mean Variance

scholarly journals Dynamic portfolio optimization with transaction costs and state-dependent drift

2015 ◽  
Vol 243 (3) ◽  
pp. 921-931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Palczewski ◽  
Rolf Poulsen ◽  
Klaus Reiner Schenk-Hoppé ◽  
Huamao Wang
Keyword(s):  
Transaction Costs ◽  
Portfolio Optimization ◽  
State Dependent ◽  
Dynamic Portfolio ◽  
Dynamic Portfolio Optimization
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document