Considerations on Efficient Touch Interfaces – How Display Size Influences the Performance in an Applied Pointing Task

Author(s):  
Michael Oehl ◽  
Christine Sutter ◽  
Martina Ziefle
Author(s):  
Mehmet Donmez ◽  
Kursat Cagiltay ◽  
Serkan Alkan ◽  
Fuat Bolukbas ◽  
Goknur Kaplan Akilli

This study explores the design considerations and usability factors of using large multi touch interfaces. In this study, an experimental approach incorporating a large multi touch interface environment was used. End user usability test sessions supported with glasses type eye tracker and interview sessions were conducted. The data were collected from one expert and three non-expert users by implementing a task on a military training application. Two analysis methods were used, analysis for eye movement data of users and analysis for interviews. This study revealed that users were generally focusing at the center of the screen while using the large multi touch display. The most common gestures were Tap and Drag which are single touch input gestures. It was easy to adapt to the system by recalling the previous experiences from mobile devices, to manage the area on the screen, and to interact with two hands thanks to display size.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong Woo Kang ◽  
Yeoun Sook Chun ◽  
Nam Ju Moon

Abstract Background To evaluate the change of accommodation and ocular discomfort according to the display size, using quantitative measurements of accommodation and ocular discomfort through subjective and objective metrics. Methods Forty six subjects without any ophthalmic disease history were asked to watch the documentary movie, using two different sizes of smart devices; smartphones and tablets. Before and after using devices, the near point accommodation (NPA) and the near point convergence (NPC) were measured, and objective accommodation was measured using an auto refractometer/keratometer. The subjective ocular discomfort was assessed through a survey. Results Both devices showed a decrease in post-use NPA and NPC, and the change after use of the smartphone was significantly severe, 1.8 and 2.5 folds respectively, compared to tablet (p = 0.044, p = 0.033, respectively). Neither smartphone nor tablet showed significant changes in the accommodative response induced by dynamic accommodative stimulus of auto refractometer/keratometer (p = 0.240 and p = 0.199, respectively). Subjects showed a more severe increase in ocular discomfort after using smartphones (p = 0.035) and reported feeling tired even with shorter use times (p = 0.012). Conclusions Both devices showed significant decreases in NPA and NPC, and the larger changes were seen when using the small display smartphone. Even within 20minutes of using, subjects start to feel ocular discomfort, and it was more severe and faster after smartphones than tablets. Therefore, the smaller the display size, the greater the adverse impact on eyes, and thus, appropriate display size will need to be selected depending on the time and purpose of use.


Author(s):  
Koshi Ikegawa ◽  
Shuhei Aoyama ◽  
Shogo Tsuchikiri ◽  
Takuto Nakamura ◽  
Yuki Hashimoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Terri Simmons

Answering that question through scientific study can strengthen a product's chances in the marketplace.


Neuroscience ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 210 ◽  
pp. 179-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Tolambiya ◽  
E. Chiovetto ◽  
T. Pozzo ◽  
E. Thomas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document