Knowledge Standardization in Evolutionary Biology: The Comparative Data Analysis Ontology

2009 ◽  
pp. 195-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Prosdocimi ◽  
Brandon Chisham ◽  
Enrico Pontelli ◽  
Arlin Stoltzfus ◽  
Julie D. Thompson
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 782-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Praveen Kumar ◽  
Priyabrata Panigrahi ◽  
James Johnson ◽  
Wanda J. Weber ◽  
Subina Mehta ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 891-900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Bremm ◽  
Tatiana von Landesberger ◽  
Jürgen Bernard ◽  
Tobias Schreck

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. EBO.S2320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Prosdocimi ◽  
Brandon Chisham ◽  
Enrico Pontelli ◽  
Julie D. Thompson ◽  
Arlin Stoltzfus

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey M. Draper ◽  
Matthew G. Styles ◽  
Richard F. Riesenfeld

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemarie Verkerk

There are many different syntactic constructions that languages can use to encode motion events. In recent decades, great advances have been made in the description and study of these syntactic constructions from languages spoken around the world (Talmy 1985, 1991, Slobin 1996, 2004). However, relatively little attention has been paid to historical change in these systems (exceptions are Vincent 1999, Dufresne, Dupuis & Tremblay 2003, Kopecka 2006 and Peyraube 2006). In this article, diachronic change of motion event encoding systems in Indo-European is investigated using the available historical–comparative data and phylogenetic comparative methods adopted from evolutionary biology. It is argued that Proto-Indo-European was not satellite-framed, as suggested by Talmy (2007) and Acedo Matellán and Mateu (2008), but had a mixed motion event encoding system, as is suggested by the available historical–comparative data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document