Early Empiric Antifungal Treatment of Infections in Neutropenic Patients Comparing Fluconazole with Amphotericin B/5-Flucytosine

Author(s):  
G. Silling ◽  
W. Fegeler ◽  
N. Roos ◽  
R. Schomaker ◽  
M. Essink ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 5024-5024
Author(s):  
Patrice Chevallier ◽  
Pierre Bordigoni ◽  
Thierry Lamy ◽  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Jean-Luc Harousseau ◽  
...  

Abstract Antifungal therapy is appropriate in neutropenic patients who have unexplained persistent fever, despite receipt of few days of antibacterial therapy. Conventional or liposomal amphotericin B are the preferred agents in this situation for allografted patients but toxicity or interaction with other drugs could limit their prescription. Caspofungin, the first inhibitor of fungal cell wall glucan synthesis, is the only echinocandin approved by the FDA for treatment of candidiasis. In case of suspected or documented aspergillosis infection, caspofungin is generally reserved to patients who failed to respond to amphotericin B or voriconazole. Recently, Walsh et al (ICAAC 2003) demonstrated in a randomised trial that caspofungin was comparable to liposomal amphotericine B in overall success as empirical antifungal therapy of persistently febrile neutropenic patients and was better tolerated. Here, we report our experience of caspofungin as preventive and empirical anti-fungal treatment, between November 2002 and May 2003, in 19 allografted patients with neutropenia (< 500/mm3 neutrophils) ± persistent fever despite at least 4 days of appropriate antibacterial therapy (n=12). There were 15 adult and 4 children, 11 male and 8 female. Median age was 33 years (range: 3–57). There were 6 ALL, 5 AML, 1 Myelodysplasia, 1 CML, 1 Hodgkin disease, 1 NHL, 1 myeloma, 1 aplastic anemia, 1 carcinoma and 1 Ewing sarcoma. A myeloablative conditioning regimen was used in 14 patients consisting of total body irradiation (TBI) plus high-dose chemotherapy in 9 patients and busulfan plus cyclophosphamide in 5 patients. A non myeloablative conditioning regimen was used in 5 patients. For graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, the regimen was cyclosporin plus methotrexate in 13 patients or ATG in 6 patients. Nine patients received a bone marrow graft, 9 received granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilized peripheral blood stem-cells and 1 received an unrelated cord blood transplant. Twelve/19 patients have received prophylaxis with fluconazole from day 0 of the graft. Patients received caspofungin at an initial dose of 70 mg then 50 mg per day. Caspofungin was initiated within a median of 10 days after allograft (range: 0–174) including 7 patients receiving preventive caspofungin treatment at the date of aplasia. The mean duration of caspofungin therapy was 16 days (range: 3–72). Caspofungin was well tolerated and not stopped because of toxicity: WHO grade 1 and 2 hepatotoxicity occurred in 5 patients including 3 with previous hepatic abnormalities, WHO grade 1 and 2 nephrotoxicity occurred in 6 patients. No infusion reaction was observed. Only one patient developed a probable invasive bronchopulmonary aspergillosis on day 30 while receiving caspofungin. Seventeen/19 (89%) patients remain alive at least 7 days after the end of caspofungin administration without documented or suspected fungal, bacterial, or viral infection. Resolution of fever occurred in 11/12 febrile neutropenic patients in a median of 2 days (range:2–13) after starting caspofungin. We conclude that caspofungin is safe and effective as preventive and empirical antifungal treatment of neutropenic allografted patients.


1991 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.W. van't Wout ◽  
I. Novakova ◽  
C.A.H. Verhagen ◽  
W.E. Fibbe ◽  
B.E. de Pauw ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 2476-2483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo J. Cagnoni ◽  
Thomas J. Walsh ◽  
Mary M. Prendergast ◽  
David Bodensteiner ◽  
Sharon Hiemenz ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: In a randomized, double-blind, comparative, multicenter trial, liposomal amphotericin B was equivalent to conventional amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in febrile neutropenic patients, using a composite end point, but was more effective in reducing proven emergent fungal infections, infusion-related toxicities, and nephrotoxicity. The purpose of this study was to compare the pharmacoeconomics of liposomal versus conventional therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Itemized hospital billing data were collected on 414 patients from 19 of the 32 centers that participated in the trial. Hospital length of stay and costs from the first dose of study medication to the time of hospital discharge were assessed. RESULTS: Hospital costs from the time of first dose to discharge were significantly higher for all patients who received liposomal amphotericin B ($48,962 v $43,183; P = .022). However, hospital costs were highly sensitive to the cost of study medication ($39,648 v $43,048 when drug costs were not included; P = .416). Using decision analysis models and sensitivity analyses to vary the cost of study medications and the risk of nephrotoxicity, the break-even points for the cost of liposomal therapy were calculated to range from $72 to $87 per 50 mg for all patients and $83 to $112 per 50 mg in allogeneic bone marrow transplant patients. CONCLUSION: The cost of liposomal amphotericin B and patient risk for developing nephrotoxicity play large roles in determining whether liposomal amphotericin B is cost-effective as first-line empirical therapy in persistently febrile neutropenic patients.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4554-4554
Author(s):  
Sebastian Sevilla ◽  
Gustavo Daniel Kusminsky ◽  
Mario Atilio Damiano ◽  
Miguel Rizzo ◽  
Jose Trucco

Abstract Abstract 4554 Introduction: Persistent fever in high risk neutropenic patients (HRNF) after day 5 of empiric treatment is a sign of high susceptibility for IFI with elevated morbidity and mortality. Diagnostic tools in this setting are inaccurate to determine the occurrence of IFI and most patients start with empiric antifungal agents. Drugs are usually associated with increasing costs and toxicity. It is challenging to establish the population of patients in whom in spite of persistent fever and neutropenia, avoidance of antifungal treatment is a reasonable strategy. Methods: We have prospectively allocated 229 HRNF patients in different empiric antimicrobial regimens over a 4.5 year period. In a retrospective revision, there were 33 patients with persistent fever on day 5 of empirical antimicrobial treatment and no evident new infection episode or clinical impairment. In 28 patients, a thorax CT scan was performed as part of the evaluation of persistent fever. The clinical outcome was evaluated regarding the presence or absence of pulmonary infiltrates in the CT scans. Initial empiric antifungal treatment, transfusions, days in hospital, days with neutropenia, antimicrobial treatment, and days with fever were evaluated. Results: Nineteen patients (68%) of 28 presented with pulmonary infiltrates. All of them received antifungal treatment. In 9 patients with normal CT scan antifungal treatment was deferred. The difference of the decision in not giving antifungals according CT scans was highly significant (p <0,0001). Transfusions of red blood cells and platelets were significantly less in the group of normal scans (p 0,0004 and 0,005 respectively). Antimicrobial treatment, days in hospital and days with fever were not significantly different in both groups. There was one death in the normal scan group due to relapse. Mortality was not significantly different in both groups. Conclusion: In HRNP, normal thorax CT scan changed the clinical decision in not starting antifungal treatment in spite of persistent fever. There was no difference in mortality with patients under antifungal treatment, allowing continuing with this strategy in more patients in the future. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document